Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
SII logo
SII
GROW logo
GROW
MFIN logo
MFIN
KO logo
KO
DHIL logo
DHIL
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SII vs GROW vs MFIN vs KO vs DHIL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SII
Sprott Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • CA
Market Cap$3.06B
5Y Perf.+229.1%
GROW
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$38M
5Y Perf.+55.8%
MFIN
Medallion Financial Corp.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$231M
5Y Perf.+270.2%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$473M
5Y Perf.+51.4%

SII vs GROW vs MFIN vs KO vs DHIL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SII logoSII
GROW logoGROW
MFIN logoMFIN
KO logoKO
DHIL logoDHIL
IndustryAsset ManagementAsset ManagementFinancial - Credit ServicesBeverages - Non-AlcoholicAsset Management
Market Cap$3.06B$38M$231M$355.61B$473M
Revenue (TTM)$386M$11M$340M$49.28B$158M
Net Income (TTM)$84M$3M$47M$13.70B$49M
Gross Margin83.4%64.9%59.3%61.7%96.0%
Operating Margin30.5%-1.4%30.9%29.3%38.4%
Forward P/E25.3x8.8x25.3x9.5x
Total Debt$0.00$83K$316M$45.49B$6.40B
Cash & Equiv.$118M$25M$202M$10.27B$42M

SII vs GROW vs MFIN vs KO vs DHILLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SII
GROW
MFIN
KO
DHIL
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Sprott Inc. (SII)100329.1+229.1%
U.S. Global Investo… (GROW)100155.8+55.8%
Medallion Financial… (MFIN)100370.2+270.2%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
Diamond Hill Invest… (DHIL)100151.4+51.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SII vs GROW vs MFIN vs KO vs DHIL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DHIL leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Sprott Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. MFIN also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇DHIL emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
SII
Sprott Inc.
The Banking Pick

SII is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 75.2%, EPS growth 38.7%
  • 5.6% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
  • 75.2% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1%
  • +89.8% vs MFIN's +8.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
GROW
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
The Financial Play

GROW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
MFIN
Medallion Financial Corp.
The Banking Pick

MFIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.

  • NIM 7.3% vs DHIL's 0.7%
  • Lower P/E (8.8x vs 25.3x)
Best for: bank quality
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, KO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

DHIL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 5.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.53, current ratio 75115.85x
  • PEG 1.14 vs KO's 2.26
  • Beta 0.53, yield 5.7%, current ratio 75115.85x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSII logoSII75.2% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1%
ValueMFIN logoMFINLower P/E (8.8x vs 25.3x)
Quality / MarginsDHIL logoDHIL30.9% margin vs MFIN's 13.7%
Stability / SafetyDHIL logoDHILBeta 0.53 vs SII's 1.51
DividendsDHIL logoDHIL5.7% yield, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)SII logoSII+89.8% vs MFIN's +8.6%
Efficiency (ROA)DHIL logoDHIL19.5% ROA vs MFIN's 1.6%, ROIC 1.3% vs 17.2%

SII vs GROW vs MFIN vs KO vs DHIL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SIISprott Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

GROWU.S. Global Investors, Inc.
FY 2025
Investment And Advisory Services
101.5%$8M
Administrative Service
1.5%$127,000
Investment Performance
-3.0%$-247,000
MFINMedallion Financial Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Investment Advisory Services
95.1%$140M
Mutual Fund Administrative Services
4.9%$7M

SII vs GROW vs MFIN vs KO vs DHIL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSIILAGGINGKO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DHIL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 4549.9x GROW's $11M. DHIL is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MFIN's 13.7%.

MetricSII logoSIISprott Inc.GROW logoGROWU.S. Global Inves…MFIN logoMFINMedallion Financi…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…DHIL logoDHILDiamond Hill Inve…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$386M$11M$340M$49.3B$158M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$121M-$111,000$111M$15.5B$62M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$84M$3M$47M$13.7B$49M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$126M$464,000$126M$12.6B$44.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+83.4%+64.9%+59.3%+61.7%+96.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+30.5%-1.4%+30.9%+29.3%+38.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+21.9%+29.1%+13.7%+27.8%+30.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+32.6%+4.3%+37.2%+25.5%+281.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+143.5%+8.8%+16.3%+18.2%+25.3%
DHIL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 5.5x trailing earnings, MFIN trades at a 88% valuation discount to SII's 44.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DHIL offers better value at 1.18x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSII logoSIISprott Inc.GROW logoGROWU.S. Global Inves…MFIN logoMFINMedallion Financi…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…DHIL logoDHILDiamond Hill Inve…
Market CapShares × price$3.1B$38M$231M$355.6B$473M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.9B$13M$346M$390.8B$6.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS44.83x-118.40x5.51x27.18x9.77x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.29x8.80x25.27x9.48x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.33x2.43x1.18x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple29.48x1.94x26.39x110.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue10.39x4.44x0.65x7.42x3.00x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share8.35x0.87x0.47x10.40x2.70x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF31.96x1.83x67.15x
MFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SII leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $7 for GROW. GROW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DHIL's 36.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SII scores 7/9 vs GROW's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSII logoSIISprott Inc.GROW logoGROWU.S. Global Inves…MFIN logoMFINMedallion Financi…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…DHIL logoDHILDiamond Hill Inve…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+23.5%+7.0%+9.4%+41.1%+27.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+17.5%+6.5%+1.6%+13.1%+19.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+21.1%-4.7%+17.2%+15.8%+1.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+24.8%-6.2%+10.0%+17.3%+26.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–972776
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.62x1.33x36.26x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$118M-$24M$115M$35.2B$6.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$118M$25M$202M$10.3B$42M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$83,000$316M$45.5B$6.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense94.69x776.00x1.07x10.70x
SII leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SII five years ago would be worth $29,214 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,280 for GROW. Over the past 12 months, SII leads with a +89.8% total return vs MFIN's +8.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SII at 54.8% vs DHIL's 4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSII logoSIISprott Inc.GROW logoGROWU.S. Global Inves…MFIN logoMFINMedallion Financi…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…DHIL logoDHILDiamond Hill Inve…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+18.1%+21.8%-1.1%+20.3%+2.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+89.8%+28.2%+8.6%+17.2%+25.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+271.1%+15.9%+44.5%+47.0%+13.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+192.1%-47.2%+25.5%+65.6%+29.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+555.3%+89.2%+65.9%+121.1%+41.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+54.8%+5.0%+13.1%+13.7%+4.2%
SII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — KO and DHIL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SII's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DHIL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs SII's 70.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSII logoSIISprott Inc.GROW logoGROWU.S. Global Inves…MFIN logoMFINMedallion Financi…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…DHIL logoDHILDiamond Hill Inve…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.51x0.77x1.12x-0.20x0.53x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$169.63$3.65$11.00$84.04$175.03
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$61.94$2.23$7.88$65.35$114.11
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+70.0%+81.1%+89.2%+98.3%+100.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10036.067.157.460.670.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded174K25K62K12.7M17K
Evenly matched — KO and DHIL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KO and DHIL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SII as "Buy", MFIN as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.0% upside for MFIN (target: $11) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, DHIL offers the higher dividend yield at 5.71% vs SII's 1.09%.

MetricSII logoSIISprott Inc.GROW logoGROWU.S. Global Inves…MFIN logoMFINMedallion Financi…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…DHIL logoDHILDiamond Hill Inve…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.50$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts1948
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%+3.1%+4.6%+2.5%+5.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises203560
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.30$0.09$0.45$2.04$9.98
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+5.2%+0.4%+0.2%+3.6%
Evenly matched — KO and DHIL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SII leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). DHIL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallSprott Inc. (SII)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SII vs GROW vs MFIN vs KO vs DHIL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SII or GROW or MFIN or KO or DHIL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Sprott Inc.

(SII) is the stronger pick with 75. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 5. 5x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sprott Inc. (SII) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SII or GROW or MFIN or KO or DHIL?

On trailing P/E, Medallion Financial Corp.

(MFIN) is the cheapest at 5. 5x versus Sprott Inc. at 44. 8x. On forward P/E, Medallion Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. wins at 1. 14x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SII or GROW or MFIN or KO or DHIL?

Over the past 5 years, Sprott Inc.

(SII) delivered a total return of +192. 1%, compared to -47. 2% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SII returned +555. 3% versus DHIL's +41. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SII or GROW or MFIN or KO or DHIL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Sprott Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning SII is approximately -855% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 36% for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SII or GROW or MFIN or KO or DHIL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sprott Inc.

(SII) is pulling ahead at 75. 2% versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sprott Inc. grew EPS 38. 7% year-over-year, compared to -126. 6% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SII or GROW or MFIN or KO or DHIL?

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.

(DHIL) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus -4. 0% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFIN leads at 50. 5% versus -35. 3% for GROW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFIN leads at 96. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SII or GROW or MFIN or KO or DHIL more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (DHIL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 14x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for Sprott Inc. — 16. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MFIN: 7. 0% to $10. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SII or GROW or MFIN or KO or DHIL?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (DHIL) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 1. 1% for Sprott Inc. (SII).

09

Is SII or GROW or MFIN or KO or DHIL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Sprott Inc. (SII) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, SII: +555. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SII and GROW and MFIN and KO and DHIL?

These companies operate in different sectors (SII (Financial Services) and GROW (Financial Services) and MFIN (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and DHIL (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SII is a small-cap high-growth stock; GROW is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; DHIL is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.