Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SMBK vs SRCE vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
SMBK vs SRCE vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $777M | $1.91B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $316M | $580M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $50M | $161M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 61.0% | 55.4% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 27.1% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 11.6x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $102M | $341M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $464M | $69M | $10.27B |
SMBK vs SRCE vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) | 100 | 281.0 | +181.0% |
| 1st Source Corporat… (SRCE) | 100 | 220.7 | +120.7% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMBK vs SRCE vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMBK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 10.9%, EPS growth 39.3%
- 198.2% 10Y total return vs SRCE's 176.3%
- 10.9% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
SRCE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.59, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.59, Low D/E 25.8%, current ratio 12.62x
- PEG 0.76 vs KO's 2.26
KO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and dividends.
- 27.8% margin vs SMBK's 15.9%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs SMBK's 0.7%
- 13.1% ROA vs SMBK's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.9% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.76 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs SMBK's 15.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.59 vs SMBK's 0.77 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs SMBK's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.8% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs SMBK's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.7% |
SMBK vs SRCE vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SMBK vs SRCE vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 155.8x SMBK's $316M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMBK's 15.9%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $316M | $580M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $70M | $163M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $50M | $161M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $57M | $152M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.0% | +55.4% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +27.1% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +27.7% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +26.2% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.1% | +7.2% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SRCE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, SRCE trades at a 55% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SRCE offers better value at 0.79x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $777M | $1.9B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $414M | $2.2B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.26x | 12.15x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.50x | 11.57x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.18x | 0.79x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.93x | 10.19x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.46x | 3.18x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.39x | 1.45x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.10x | 8.97x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $10 for SMBK. SMBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SRCE scores 8/9 vs SMBK's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +12.4% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.8% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +9.7% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | +4.0% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.26x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$363M | $271M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $464M | $69M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $102M | $341M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.51x | 0.98x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SMBK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMBK five years ago would be worth $19,258 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,560 for KO. Over the past 12 months, SMBK leads with a +41.8% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SMBK at 26.8% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.8% | +27.0% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.8% | +29.3% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.9% | +81.8% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.6% | +75.0% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.2% | +176.3% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.8% | +22.0% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SRCE and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMBK's 0.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 0.59x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.63 | $78.80 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.95 | $56.89 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +99.6% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.1 | 68.9 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 122K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMBK as "Hold", SRCE as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for SMBK (target: $49) vs 3.2% for SRCE (target: $81). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs SMBK's 0.71%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.00 | $81.00 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 4 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +2.0% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 9 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | $1.58 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SRCE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SMBK vs SRCE vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMBK or SRCE or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SmartFinancial, Inc.
(SMBK) is the stronger pick with 10. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMBK or SRCE or KO?
On trailing P/E, 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) is the cheapest at 12.
2x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, 1st Source Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: 1st Source Corporation wins at 0. 76x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMBK or SRCE or KO?
Over the past 5 years, SmartFinancial, Inc.
(SMBK) delivered a total return of +92. 6%, compared to +65. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMBK returned +198. 2% versus KO's +121. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMBK or SRCE or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus SmartFinancial, Inc. 's 0. 77β — meaning SMBK is approximately -485% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMBK or SRCE or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SmartFinancial, Inc.
(SMBK) is pulling ahead at 10. 9% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SmartFinancial, Inc. grew EPS 39. 3% year-over-year, compared to 20. 5% for 1st Source Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMBK or SRCE or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 15. 9% for SmartFinancial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SRCE leads at 34. 2% versus 19. 4% for SMBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SRCE leads at 70. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMBK or SRCE or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 76x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 13. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMBK: 7. 8% to $49. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMBK or SRCE or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 0. 7% for SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK).
09Is SMBK or SRCE or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, SMBK: +198. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMBK and SRCE and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (SMBK (Financial Services) and SRCE (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SMBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; SRCE is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.