Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
SOBO logo
SOBO
OKE logo
OKE
WMB logo
WMB
KMI logo
KMI
ET logo
ET
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SOBO vs OKE vs WMB vs KMI vs ET

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SOBO
South Bow Corporation

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • CA
Market Cap$7.48B
5Y Perf.+43.7%
OKE
ONEOK, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$53.57B
5Y Perf.-12.2%
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$89.43B
5Y Perf.+39.6%
KMI
Kinder Morgan, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$70.28B
5Y Perf.+28.9%
ET
Energy Transfer LP

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$64.51B
5Y Perf.+13.8%

SOBO vs OKE vs WMB vs KMI vs ET — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SOBO logoSOBO
OKE logoOKE
WMB logoWMB
KMI logoKMI
ET logoET
IndustryOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$7.48B$53.57B$89.43B$70.28B$64.51B
Revenue (TTM)$1.62B$35.20B$11.92B$17.52B$89.38B
Net Income (TTM)$397M$3.53B$2.84B$3.31B$5.55B
Gross Margin37.9%23.9%62.8%46.9%22.9%
Operating Margin26.6%20.3%38.8%28.6%11.1%
Forward P/E20.4x14.9x30.9x21.6x12.8x
Total Debt$5.78B$32.82B$29.36B$32.39B$71.61B
Cash & Equiv.$574M$78M$63M$109M$1.27B

SOBO vs OKE vs WMB vs KMI vs ETLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SOBO
OKE
WMB
KMI
ET
StockOct 24Jun 26Return
South Bow Corporati… (SOBO)100143.7+43.7%
ONEOK, Inc. (OKE)10087.8-12.2%
The Williams Compan… (WMB)100139.6+39.6%
Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI)100128.9+28.9%
Energy Transfer LP (ET)100113.8+13.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SOBO vs OKE vs WMB vs KMI vs ET

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SOBO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. ONEOK, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. KMI and ET also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇SOBO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
SOBO
South Bow Corporation
The Defensive Pick

SOBO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.01, current ratio 1.50x
  • Beta 0.01, yield 5.7%, current ratio 1.50x
  • 24.5% margin vs ET's 6.2%
  • Beta 0.01 vs WMB's 0.09
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
OKE
ONEOK, Inc.
The Growth Leader

OKE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and efficiency is your priority.

  • 55.4% revenue growth vs SOBO's -24.0%
  • 5.3% ROA vs SOBO's 3.8%, ROIC 9.6% vs 3.0%
Best for: growth and efficiency
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.
The Growth Play

WMB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.9%
  • 300.0% 10Y total return vs ET's 145.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
KMI
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
The Value Pick

KMI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.22 vs OKE's 0.48
  • Lower P/E (21.6x vs 30.9x), PEG 0.22 vs 0.47
Best for: valuation efficiency
ET
Energy Transfer LP
The Income Pick

ET is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 6.9%
  • 6.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs KMI's 3.7%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthOKE logoOKE55.4% revenue growth vs SOBO's -24.0%
ValueKMI logoKMILower P/E (21.6x vs 30.9x), PEG 0.22 vs 0.47
Quality / MarginsSOBO logoSOBO24.5% margin vs ET's 6.2%
Stability / SafetySOBO logoSOBOBeta 0.01 vs WMB's 0.09
DividendsET logoET6.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs KMI's 3.7%
Momentum (1Y)SOBO logoSOBO+45.0% vs OKE's +9.9%
Efficiency (ROA)OKE logoOKE5.3% ROA vs SOBO's 3.8%, ROIC 9.6% vs 3.0%

SOBO vs OKE vs WMB vs KMI vs ET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Oil & Gas Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Oil & Gas Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
SOBOSouth Bow Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

OKEONEOK, Inc.
FY 2025
Natural Gas Liquids
43.6%$16.0B
Refined Products and Crude Oil
35.5%$13.0B
Natural Gas Gathering And Processing
20.9%$7.7B
WMBThe Williams Companies, Inc.
FY 2025
Gas & NGL Marketing Services
71.6%$7.2B
West
28.4%$2.8B
KMIKinder Morgan, Inc.
FY 2025
Natural Gas Pipelines
64.9%$11.0B
Products Pipelines
15.8%$2.7B
Terminals
12.4%$2.1B
CO2
6.9%$1.2B
ETEnergy Transfer LP
FY 2024
Oil and Gas
30.7%$25.4B
Oil and Gas, Refining and Marketing
26.7%$22.1B
NGL sales
23.1%$19.1B
Natural Gas, Midstream
14.5%$12.0B
Natural gas sales
3.3%$2.7B
Product and Service, Other
1.7%$1.4B

SOBO vs OKE vs WMB vs KMI vs ET — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLOKELAGGINGKMI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — SOBO and WMB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

ET is the larger business by revenue, generating $89.4B annually — 55.0x SOBO's $1.6B. SOBO is the more profitable business, keeping 24.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ET's 6.2%. On growth, ET holds the edge at +32.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSOBO logoSOBOSouth Bow Corpora…OKE logoOKEONEOK, Inc.WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…KMI logoKMIKinder Morgan, In…ET logoETEnergy Transfer LP
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.6B$35.2B$11.9B$17.5B$89.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$662M$8.6B$6.8B$7.5B$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$397M$3.5B$2.8B$3.3B$5.6B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$609M$2.2B$722M$3.9B$5.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+37.9%+23.9%+62.8%+46.9%+22.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.6%+20.3%+38.8%+28.6%+11.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+24.5%+10.0%+23.8%+18.9%+6.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+37.5%+6.4%+6.1%+22.2%+6.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-16.2%+19.6%-0.6%+13.5%+32.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-14.3%+18.3%+24.6%+37.5%-2.8%
Evenly matched — SOBO and WMB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ET leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 13.9x trailing earnings, ET trades at a 59% valuation discount to WMB's 34.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KMI offers better value at 0.24x vs WMB's 0.52x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSOBO logoSOBOSouth Bow Corpora…OKE logoOKEONEOK, Inc.WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…KMI logoKMIKinder Morgan, In…ET logoETEnergy Transfer LP
Market CapShares × price$7.5B$53.6B$89.4B$70.3B$64.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$12.7B$86.3B$118.7B$102.6B$134.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS17.00x15.69x34.17x23.06x13.89x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.43x14.90x30.92x21.58x12.76x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.51x0.52x0.24x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.31x10.18x17.59x14.12x9.14x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.64x1.59x7.48x4.15x0.78x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.77x2.38x5.95x2.17x1.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.64x21.89x88.98x21.82x16.77x
ET leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

OKE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

WMB delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $10 for KMI. KMI carries lower financial leverage with a 1.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SOBO's 2.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KMI scores 8/9 vs ET's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSOBO logoSOBOSouth Bow Corpora…OKE logoOKEONEOK, Inc.WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…KMI logoKMIKinder Morgan, In…ET logoETEnergy Transfer LP
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+16.1%+15.9%+19.0%+10.3%+11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.8%+5.3%+4.9%+4.5%+4.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.0%+9.6%+7.7%+5.6%+6.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.3%+11.6%+8.7%+7.0%+7.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955785
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.14x1.45x1.96x1.00x1.45x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.2B$32.7B$29.3B$32.3B$70.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$574M$78M$63M$109M$1.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5.8B$32.8B$29.4B$32.4B$71.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.78x3.56x3.37x2.86x2.64x
OKE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WMB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WMB five years ago would be worth $31,612 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,438 for SOBO. Over the past 12 months, SOBO leads with a +45.0% total return vs OKE's +9.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMB at 37.1% vs OKE's 17.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSOBO logoSOBOSouth Bow Corpora…OKE logoOKEONEOK, Inc.WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…KMI logoKMIKinder Morgan, In…ET logoETEnergy Transfer LP
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+30.4%+17.3%+21.9%+16.1%+17.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+45.0%+9.9%+27.1%+18.8%+12.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+74.4%+63.8%+157.7%+110.4%+77.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+74.4%+97.4%+216.1%+111.0%+131.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+74.4%+162.8%+300.0%+127.9%+145.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+20.4%+17.9%+37.1%+28.1%+21.1%
WMB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SOBO and OKE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

OKE is the less volatile stock with a -0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WMB's 0.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SOBO currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs OKE's 88.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSOBO logoSOBOSouth Bow Corpora…OKE logoOKEONEOK, Inc.WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…KMI logoKMIKinder Morgan, In…ET logoETEnergy Transfer LP
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.01x-0.17x0.09x-0.03x0.01x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$38.45$96.07$80.08$34.80$20.70
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$25.02$64.02$55.82$25.60$16.18
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.3%+88.5%+91.3%+90.8%+90.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.742.841.643.637.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded763K3.7M5.6M9.5M11.5M
Evenly matched — SOBO and OKE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — WMB and KMI and ET each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SOBO as "Hold", OKE as "Hold", WMB as "Buy", KMI as "Hold", ET as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.7% upside for ET (target: $23) vs -11.3% for SOBO (target: $32). For income investors, ET offers the higher dividend yield at 6.90% vs WMB's 2.74%.

MetricSOBO logoSOBOSouth Bow Corpora…OKE logoOKEONEOK, Inc.WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…KMI logoKMIKinder Morgan, In…ET logoETEnergy Transfer LP
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$31.80$92.50$83.75$36.67$23.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts639343433
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+5.7%+4.8%+2.7%+3.7%+6.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises23884
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.03$4.09$2.00$1.17$1.29
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — WMB and KMI and ET each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ET leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). OKE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallONEOK, Inc. (OKE)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SOBO vs OKE vs WMB vs KMI vs ET: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SOBO or OKE or WMB or KMI or ET a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ONEOK, Inc.

(OKE) is the stronger pick with 55. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 0% for South Bow Corporation (SOBO). Energy Transfer LP (ET) offers the better valuation at 13. 9x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SOBO or OKE or WMB or KMI or ET?

On trailing P/E, Energy Transfer LP (ET) is the cheapest at 13.

9x versus The Williams Companies, Inc. at 34. 2x. On forward P/E, Energy Transfer LP is actually cheaper at 12. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Kinder Morgan, Inc. wins at 0. 22x versus ONEOK, Inc. 's 0. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SOBO or OKE or WMB or KMI or ET?

Over the past 5 years, The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) delivered a total return of +216. 1%, compared to +74. 4% for South Bow Corporation (SOBO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMB returned +300. 0% versus SOBO's +74. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SOBO or OKE or WMB or KMI or ET?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ONEOK, Inc.

(OKE) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 17β versus The Williams Companies, Inc. 's 0. 09β — meaning WMB is approximately -154% more volatile than OKE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 100% versus 2% for South Bow Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SOBO or OKE or WMB or KMI or ET?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ONEOK, Inc.

(OKE) is pulling ahead at 55. 4% versus -24. 0% for South Bow Corporation (SOBO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: South Bow Corporation grew EPS 38. 8% year-over-year, compared to 4. 8% for ONEOK, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OKE leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SOBO or OKE or WMB or KMI or ET?

South Bow Corporation (SOBO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

4% net margin versus 5. 9% for Energy Transfer LP — meaning it keeps 27. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMB leads at 36. 8% versus 11. 4% for ET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KMI leads at 43. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SOBO or OKE or WMB or KMI or ET more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 22x versus ONEOK, Inc. 's 0. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Energy Transfer LP (ET) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for The Williams Companies, Inc. — 18. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ET: 22. 7% to $23. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SOBO or OKE or WMB or KMI or ET?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Energy Transfer LP (ET) offers the highest yield at 6. 9%, versus 2. 7% for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB).

09

Is SOBO or OKE or WMB or KMI or ET better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, ONEOK, Inc.

(OKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 17), 4. 8% yield, +162. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OKE: +162. 8%, SOBO: +74. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SOBO and OKE and WMB and KMI and ET?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SOBO is a small-cap deep-value stock; OKE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KMI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ET is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.