Compare Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) vs The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) Stock

The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) offers the better valuation at 26.2x trailing P/E (21.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) is the cheapest at 26.2x versus Sportradar Group AG at 154.8x. On forward P/E, The Trade Desk, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21.1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sportradar Group AG wins at 1.18x versus The Trade Desk, Inc.'s 1.60x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) delivered a total return of -27.1%, compared to -71.4% for The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD). A $10,000 investment in SRAD five years ago would be worth approximately $7K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTD returned +691.4% versus SRAD's -27.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.80β versus The Trade Desk, Inc.'s 1.67β — meaning TTD is approximately 109% more volatile than SRAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 18% for The Trade Desk, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) is the more profitable company, earning 15.3% net margin versus 3.1% for Sportradar Group AG — meaning it keeps 15.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTD leads at 20.3% versus 12.2% for SRAD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTD leads at 78.6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1.18x versus The Trade Desk, Inc.'s 1.60x. A PEG below 1.5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) trades at 21.1x forward P/E versus 36.7x for Sportradar Group AG — 15.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTD: 95.8% to $46.65.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.80)). The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) carries a higher beta of 1.67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SRAD: -27.1%, TTD: +691.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.