Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SSBI vs WAFD vs BANR vs CVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SSBI vs WAFD vs BANR vs CVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $90M | $2.85B | $2.28B | $2.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $59M | $1.39B | $819M | $644M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $243M | $195M | $209M |
| Gross Margin | 55.8% | 52.8% | 79.0% | 79.7% |
| Operating Margin | 15.2% | 22.4% | 29.5% | 43.7% |
| Forward P/E | 13.3x | 11.4x | 10.9x | 14.7x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $1.82B | $373M | $991M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $66M | $657M | $183M | $108M |
SSBI vs WAFD vs BANR vs CVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summit State Bank (SSBI) | 100 | 165.0 | +65.0% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 138.1 | +38.1% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 176.9 | +76.9% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SSBI vs WAFD vs BANR vs CVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SSBI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +35.7% vs BANR's +11.1%
WAFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 59.8%, current ratio 0.15x
- Beta 0.66, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.15x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
BANR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth -0.9%, EPS growth 15.6%
- 101.5% 10Y total return vs WAFD's 91.9%
- PEG 0.94 vs CVBF's 4.64
- NIM 3.6% vs WAFD's 2.5%
CVBF lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.9% NII/revenue growth vs SSBI's -5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.94 vs 4.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs CVBF's 0.81 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs CVBF's 3.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.7% vs BANR's +11.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% |
SSBI vs WAFD vs BANR vs CVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SSBI vs WAFD vs BANR vs CVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BANR leads in 2 of 6 categories
CVBF leads 1 • SSBI leads 0 • WAFD leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAFD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 23.7x SSBI's $59M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SSBI's 11.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $59M | $1.4B | $819M | $644M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $277M | $253M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $243M | $195M | $209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $215M | $248M | $217M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.8% | +52.8% | +79.0% | +79.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +22.4% | +29.5% | +43.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +17.5% | +23.8% | +32.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +15.5% | +30.3% | +33.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.1% | +46.3% | +11.2% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BANR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, BANR trades at a 15% valuation discount to WAFD's 14.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANR offers better value at 1.03x vs WAFD's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $90M | $2.9B | $2.3B | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30M | $4.0B | $2.5B | $3.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.32x | 14.10x | 11.92x | 13.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.35x | 10.92x | 14.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.58x | 1.03x | 4.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.37x | 13.41x | 9.77x | 13.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.53x | 2.02x | 2.78x | 4.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 0.98x | 1.19x | 1.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.71x | 13.71x | 9.19x | 13.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BANR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BANR delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $7 for SSBI. SSBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WAFD scores 7/9 vs CVBF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.9% | +8.0% | +10.3% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.9% | +1.2% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.6% | +3.9% | +7.7% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +5.7% | +10.1% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.60x | 0.19x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$60M | $1.2B | $190M | $883M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $66M | $657M | $183M | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $1.8B | $373M | $991M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 0.48x | 1.11x | 2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BANR and CVBF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BANR five years ago would be worth $13,506 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,051 for SSBI. Over the past 12 months, SSBI leads with a +35.7% total return vs BANR's +11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVBF at 18.0% vs SSBI's -3.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.9% | +17.1% | +9.3% | +14.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.7% | +32.5% | +11.1% | +16.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.8% | +37.6% | +59.7% | +64.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.5% | +29.5% | +35.1% | +15.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.1% | +91.9% | +101.5% | +66.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.4% | +11.2% | +16.9% | +18.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SSBI and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SSBI is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVBF's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs SSBI's 96.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.03x | 0.66x | 0.67x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.00 | $37.10 | $69.83 | $21.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.40 | $26.31 | $57.05 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.1% | +99.9% | +96.3% | +98.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 63.8 | 60.0 | 60.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 525K | 218K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WAFD and CVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WAFD as "Hold", BANR as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs -5.6% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs WAFD's 2.84%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $35.00 | $64.25 | $24.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 13 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% | +2.9% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 16 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.05 | $1.96 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.6% | +1.5% | +2.8% |
BANR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CVBF leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
SSBI vs WAFD vs BANR vs CVBF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SSBI or WAFD or BANR or CVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the stronger pick with -0.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Summit State Bank (SSBI). Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SSBI or WAFD or BANR or CVBF?
On trailing P/E, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the cheapest at 11.
9x versus WaFd, Inc. at 14. 1x. On forward P/E, Banner Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 94x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SSBI or WAFD or BANR or CVBF?
Over the past 5 years, Banner Corporation (BANR) delivered a total return of +35.
1%, compared to +10. 5% for Summit State Bank (SSBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BANR returned +101. 5% versus CVBF's +66. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SSBI or WAFD or BANR or CVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Summit State Bank (SSBI) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
03β versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 0. 81β — meaning CVBF is approximately -2762% more volatile than SSBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Summit State Bank (SSBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SSBI or WAFD or BANR or CVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Banner Corporation (BANR) is pulling ahead at -0.
9% versus -5. 2% for Summit State Bank (SSBI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Summit State Bank grew EPS 262. 9% year-over-year, compared to 5. 2% for WaFd, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SSBI or WAFD or BANR or CVBF?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 11. 6% for Summit State Bank — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 15. 2% for SSBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SSBI or WAFD or BANR or CVBF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 94x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Banner Corporation (BANR) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 14. 7x for CVB Financial Corp. — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 16. 6% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SSBI or WAFD or BANR or CVBF?
In this comparison, CVBF (3.
8% yield), BANR (2. 9% yield), WAFD (2. 8% yield) pay a dividend. SSBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SSBI or WAFD or BANR or CVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Summit State Bank (SSBI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
03)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SSBI: +73. 1%, CVBF: +66. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SSBI and WAFD and BANR and CVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WAFD, BANR, CVBF pay a dividend while SSBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.