Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SSBI vs WAFD vs KO vs BANR vs CVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SSBI vs WAFD vs KO vs BANR vs CVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $90M | $2.85B | $355.61B | $2.28B | $2.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $59M | $1.39B | $49.28B | $819M | $644M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $243M | $13.70B | $195M | $209M |
| Gross Margin | 55.8% | 52.8% | 61.7% | 79.0% | 79.7% |
| Operating Margin | 15.2% | 22.4% | 29.3% | 29.5% | 43.7% |
| Forward P/E | 13.3x | 11.4x | 25.3x | 10.9x | 14.7x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $1.82B | $45.49B | $373M | $991M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $66M | $657M | $10.27B | $183M | $108M |
SSBI vs WAFD vs KO vs BANR vs CVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summit State Bank (SSBI) | 100 | 165.0 | +65.0% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 138.1 | +38.1% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 176.9 | +76.9% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SSBI vs WAFD vs KO vs BANR vs CVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SSBI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +35.7% vs BANR's +11.1%
WAFD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 59.8%, current ratio 0.15x
- Beta 0.66, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.15x
- Beta 0.66 vs CVBF's 0.81
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs BANR's 101.5%
- 1.9% revenue growth vs SSBI's -5.2%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs CVBF's 3.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
BANR is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.94 vs CVBF's 4.64
- NIM 3.6% vs WAFD's 2.5%
- Lower P/E (10.9x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.94 vs 4.64
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 32.5% margin vs SSBI's 11.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.9% revenue growth vs SSBI's -5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.94 vs 4.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.5% margin vs SSBI's 11.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs CVBF's 0.81 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs CVBF's 3.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.7% vs BANR's +11.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs SSBI's 0.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.6% |
SSBI vs WAFD vs KO vs BANR vs CVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SSBI vs WAFD vs KO vs BANR vs CVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
CVBF leads 1 • BANR leads 1 • SSBI leads 0 • WAFD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 837.6x SSBI's $59M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SSBI's 11.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $59M | $1.4B | $49.3B | $819M | $644M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $277M | $15.5B | $253M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $243M | $13.7B | $195M | $209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $215M | $12.6B | $248M | $217M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.8% | +52.8% | +61.7% | +79.0% | +79.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +22.4% | +29.3% | +29.5% | +43.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +17.5% | +27.8% | +23.8% | +32.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +15.5% | +25.5% | +30.3% | +33.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.1% | +46.3% | +18.2% | +11.2% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BANR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, BANR trades at a 56% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANR offers better value at 1.03x vs WAFD's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $90M | $2.9B | $355.6B | $2.3B | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30M | $4.0B | $390.8B | $2.5B | $3.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.32x | 14.10x | 27.18x | 11.92x | 13.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.35x | 25.27x | 10.92x | 14.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.58x | 2.43x | 1.03x | 4.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.37x | 13.41x | 26.39x | 9.77x | 13.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.53x | 2.02x | 7.42x | 2.78x | 4.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 0.98x | 10.40x | 1.19x | 1.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.71x | 13.71x | 67.15x | 9.19x | 13.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $7 for SSBI. SSBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WAFD scores 7/9 vs CVBF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.9% | +8.0% | +41.1% | +10.3% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.9% | +13.1% | +1.2% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.6% | +3.9% | +15.8% | +7.7% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +5.7% | +17.3% | +10.1% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.60x | 1.33x | 0.19x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$60M | $1.2B | $35.2B | $190M | $883M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $66M | $657M | $10.3B | $183M | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $1.8B | $45.5B | $373M | $991M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 0.48x | 10.70x | 1.11x | 2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,051 for SSBI. Over the past 12 months, SSBI leads with a +35.7% total return vs BANR's +11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVBF at 18.0% vs SSBI's -3.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.9% | +17.1% | +20.3% | +9.3% | +14.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.7% | +32.5% | +17.2% | +11.1% | +16.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.8% | +37.6% | +47.0% | +59.7% | +64.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.5% | +29.5% | +65.6% | +35.1% | +15.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.1% | +91.9% | +121.1% | +101.5% | +66.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.4% | +11.2% | +13.7% | +16.9% | +18.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WAFD and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVBF's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs SSBI's 96.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.03x | 0.66x | -0.20x | 0.67x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.00 | $37.10 | $84.04 | $69.83 | $21.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.40 | $26.31 | $65.35 | $57.05 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.1% | +99.9% | +98.3% | +96.3% | +98.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 63.8 | 60.6 | 60.0 | 60.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 525K | 12.7M | 218K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KO and CVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WAFD as "Hold", KO as "Buy", BANR as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs -5.6% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs KO's 2.46%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $35.00 | $86.13 | $64.25 | $24.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 48 | 13 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% | +2.5% | +2.9% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 16 | 56 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.05 | $2.04 | $1.96 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.6% | +0.2% | +1.5% | +2.8% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CVBF leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
SSBI vs WAFD vs KO vs BANR vs CVBF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SSBI or WAFD or KO or BANR or CVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger pick with 1.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Summit State Bank (SSBI). Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SSBI or WAFD or KO or BANR or CVBF?
On trailing P/E, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the cheapest at 11.
9x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Banner Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 94x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SSBI or WAFD or KO or BANR or CVBF?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to +10. 5% for Summit State Bank (SSBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus CVBF's +66. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SSBI or WAFD or KO or BANR or CVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 0. 81β — meaning CVBF is approximately -507% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Summit State Bank (SSBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SSBI or WAFD or KO or BANR or CVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is pulling ahead at 1.
9% versus -5. 2% for Summit State Bank (SSBI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Summit State Bank grew EPS 262. 9% year-over-year, compared to 5. 2% for WaFd, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SSBI or WAFD or KO or BANR or CVBF?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 11. 6% for Summit State Bank — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 15. 2% for SSBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SSBI or WAFD or KO or BANR or CVBF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 94x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Banner Corporation (BANR) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 16. 6% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SSBI or WAFD or KO or BANR or CVBF?
In this comparison, CVBF (3.
8% yield), BANR (2. 9% yield), WAFD (2. 8% yield), KO (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. SSBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SSBI or WAFD or KO or BANR or CVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, CVBF: +66. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SSBI and WAFD and KO and BANR and CVBF?
These companies operate in different sectors (SSBI (Financial Services) and WAFD (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and BANR (Financial Services) and CVBF (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SSBI is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock. WAFD, KO, BANR, CVBF pay a dividend while SSBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.