Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
STUB vs LYV vs JPM vs KO vs MSGE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Entertainment
STUB vs LYV vs JPM vs KO vs MSGE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Entertainment | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $4.02B | $40.09B | $896.00B | $355.61B | $3.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.79B | $25.61B | $280.33B | $49.28B | $1.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.84B | $84M | $57.05B | $13.70B | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 81.2% | 40.3% | 60.0% | 61.7% | 45.5% |
| Operating Margin | -71.7% | 3.4% | 25.9% | 29.3% | 14.6% |
| Forward P/E | 22.8x | — | 14.4x | 25.3x | 65.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.51B | $12.44B | $942.38B | $45.49B | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.24B | $7.11B | $343.34B | $10.27B | $43M |
STUB vs LYV vs JPM vs KO vs MSGE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | 100 | 389.1 | +289.1% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| Madison Square Gard… (MSGE) | 100 | 98.0 | -2.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STUB vs LYV vs JPM vs KO vs MSGE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, STUB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LYV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 8.8%, EPS growth -108.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.7%
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, current ratio 1.00x
- 8.8% revenue growth vs MSGE's -1.7%
JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 65.4x)
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- Beta -0.20, yield 2.5%, current ratio 1.46x
- 27.8% margin vs STUB's -102.3%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
MSGE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +99.5% vs STUB's -47.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.8% revenue growth vs MSGE's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 65.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs STUB's -102.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs STUB's 1.77 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +99.5% vs STUB's -47.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs STUB's -34.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs -39.1% |
STUB vs LYV vs JPM vs KO vs MSGE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STUB vs LYV vs JPM vs KO vs MSGE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
KO leads 2 • STUB leads 1 • LYV leads 0 • MSGE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STUB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 275.2x MSGE's $1.0B. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STUB's -102.3%. On growth, STUB holds the edge at +12.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $25.6B | $280.3B | $49.3B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.3B | $1.6B | $81.4B | $15.5B | $206M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.8B | $84M | $57.0B | $13.7B | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $322M | $1.2B | $100.9B | $12.6B | $327M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.2% | +40.3% | +60.0% | +61.7% | +45.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -71.7% | +3.4% | +25.9% | +29.3% | +14.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -102.3% | +0.3% | +20.4% | +27.8% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +4.8% | +36.0% | +25.5% | +32.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.2% | +12.1% | — | +12.1% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +189.2% | -4.8% | +16.0% | +18.2% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 83% valuation discount to MSGE's 95.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.0B | $40.1B | $896.0B | $355.6B | $3.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $45.4B | $1.50T | $390.8B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.99x | -718.79x | 16.00x | 27.18x | 95.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.83x | — | 14.40x | 25.27x | 65.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x | 2.43x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.54x | 18.36x | 26.39x | 24.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.30x | 1.59x | 3.20x | 7.42x | 3.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.04x | 21.99x | 2.47x | 10.40x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.02x | 120.16x | 8.88x | 67.15x | 37.35x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-94 for STUB. STUB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.78x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYV's 6.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs STUB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -94.3% | +4.4% | +15.9% | +41.1% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -34.4% | +0.4% | +1.3% | +13.1% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.1% | +19.7% | +4.5% | +15.8% | +9.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -32.9% | +13.4% | +8.9% | +17.3% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 6.84x | 2.60x | 1.33x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $265M | $5.3B | $599.0B | $35.2B | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $7.1B | $343.3B | $10.3B | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $12.4B | $942.4B | $45.5B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.89x | 3.68x | 0.74x | 10.70x | 3.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,209 for STUB. Over the past 12 months, MSGE leads with a +99.5% total return vs STUB's -47.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs STUB's -19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.8% | +18.7% | -0.5% | +20.3% | +35.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.9% | +22.1% | +21.8% | +17.2% | +99.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.9% | +101.4% | +138.2% | +47.0% | +100.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.9% | +99.7% | +118.2% | +65.6% | -18.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.9% | +640.7% | +465.8% | +121.1% | -17.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.5% | +26.3% | +33.6% | +13.7% | +26.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LYV and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STUB's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYV currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs STUB's 41.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.77x | 0.83x | 0.94x | -0.20x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.89 | $175.25 | $337.25 | $84.04 | $74.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.74 | $125.34 | $262.71 | $65.35 | $35.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.1% | +98.4% | +95.1% | +98.3% | +98.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.3 | 62.6 | 59.1 | 60.6 | 75.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.9M | 2.3M | 7.0M | 12.7M | 337K |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STUB as "Hold", LYV as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy", MSGE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.6% upside for STUB (target: $13) vs -8.1% for MSGE (target: $68). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.13 | $185.75 | $339.75 | $86.13 | $67.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 44 | 61 | 48 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% | +2.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 15 | 56 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 | $2.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.1% | +3.9% | +0.2% | +1.1% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). KO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
STUB vs LYV vs JPM vs KO vs MSGE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STUB or LYV or JPM or KO or MSGE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
(LYV) is the stronger pick with 8. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STUB or LYV or JPM or KO or MSGE?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. at 95. 4x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STUB or LYV or JPM or KO or MSGE?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -47. 9% for StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LYV returned +640. 7% versus STUB's -47. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STUB or LYV or JPM or KO or MSGE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus StubHub Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning STUB is approximately -983% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 7% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STUB or LYV or JPM or KO or MSGE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
(LYV) is pulling ahead at 8. 8% versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -37. 4% for StubHub Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STUB leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STUB or LYV or JPM or KO or MSGE?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -109. 2% for StubHub Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -73. 4% for STUB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STUB leads at 80. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STUB or LYV or JPM or KO or MSGE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 65. 4x for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. — 51. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STUB: 14. 6% to $13. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — STUB or LYV or JPM or KO or MSGE?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. STUB, LYV, MSGE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STUB or LYV or JPM or KO or MSGE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, STUB: -47. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STUB and LYV and JPM and KO and MSGE?
These companies operate in different sectors (STUB (Technology) and LYV (Communication Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and MSGE (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: STUB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MSGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JPM, KO pay a dividend while STUB, LYV, MSGE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.