TACH
Titan Acquisition Corp.
Shell Companies
Market Cap$287M
5Y Perf.-0.5%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisTACH
APO
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TACH vs APO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
Asset Management - Global
Market Cap$77.18B
5Y Perf.-5.6%
TACH vs APO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  TACH |  APO |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Asset Management - Global |
| Market Cap | $287M | $77.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $29.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $2.15B |
| Gross Margin | — | 89.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 31.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $74.00 | $13.36B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25.00 | $19.24B |
TACH vs APO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TACH
APO
| Stock | Jun 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Titan Acquisition C… (TACH) | 100 | 99.5 | -0.5% |
| Apollo Global Manag… (APO) | 100 | 94.4 | -5.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TACH vs APO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TACH leads in 2 of 3 categories, making it the strongest pick for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. Apollo Global Management, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇TACH emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
TACH
Titan Acquisition Corp.
The Banking Pick
TACH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for momentum and efficiency.
- +3.0% vs APO's -1.5%
- 3.8% ROA vs APO's 0.5%
Best for: momentum and efficiency
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
The Banking Pick
APO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 8.7% 10Y total return vs TACH's 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.25, Low D/E 31.4%, current ratio 0.78x
- Beta 1.25, yield 1.6%, current ratio 0.78x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends |  APO | 1.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) |  TACH | +3.0% vs APO's -1.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TACH | 3.8% ROA vs APO's 0.5% |
TACH vs APO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
TACH vs APO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTACHLAGGINGAPO
APOApollo Global Managem…
1leads
TACHTitan Acquisition Cor…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs APOMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
—
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TACH1/1
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TACH3/4
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
APO4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
TACH2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APO and TACH operate at a comparable scale, with $29.7B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | TACHTitan Acquisition… | APOApollo Global Man… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $29.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$99,706 | $10.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$536,520 | $4.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +89.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +31.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +7.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -5.8% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Valuation Metrics
TACH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | TACHTitan Acquisition… | APOApollo Global Man… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $287M | $77.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $287M | $71.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -246.45x | 18.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.36x |
TACH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Profitability & Efficiency
TACH leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TACH delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $6 for APO.
| Metric | TACHTitan Acquisition… | APOApollo Global Man… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +16.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $49 | -$5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25 | $19.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $74 | $13.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 26.54x |
TACH leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APO five years ago would be worth $24,874 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,297 for TACH. Over the past 12 months, TACH leads with a +3.0% total return vs APO's -1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APO at 23.8% vs TACH's 1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TACHTitan Acquisition… | APOApollo Global Man… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.7% | -8.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.0% | -1.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.0% | +89.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.0% | +148.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.0% | +867.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.0% | +23.8% |
APO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TACH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TACH is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than APO's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TACH currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs APO's 85.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TACHTitan Acquisition… | APOApollo Global Man… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.00 | $157.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.04 | $99.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.5% | +85.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.1 | 59.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 3.4M |
TACH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
APO is the only dividend payer here at 1.59% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | TACHTitan Acquisition… | APOApollo Global Man… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $153.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
TACH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). APO leads in 1 (Total Returns).
Best OverallTitan Acquisition Corp. (TACH)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TACH vs APO: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TACH or APO a better buy right now?
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
(APO) offers the better valuation at 18. 4x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TACH or APO?
Over the past 5 years, Apollo Global Management, Inc.
(APO) delivered a total return of +148. 7%, compared to +3. 0% for Titan Acquisition Corp. (TACH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APO returned +867. 6% versus TACH's +3. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TACH or APO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Titan Acquisition Corp.
(TACH) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 02β versus Apollo Global Management, Inc. 's 1. 25β — meaning APO is approximately -5519% more volatile than TACH relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — TACH or APO?
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
(APO) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 8% net margin versus 0. 0% for Titan Acquisition Corp. — meaning it keeps 14. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APO leads at 34. 4% versus 0. 0% for TACH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — APO leads at 88. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — TACH or APO?
In this comparison, APO (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. TACH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is TACH or APO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Titan Acquisition Corp.
(TACH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 02)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TACH: +3. 0%, APO: +867. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between TACH and APO?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TACH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APO is a mid-cap high-growth stock. APO pays a dividend while TACH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.