Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
TACH logo
TACH
BN logo
BN
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TACH vs BN vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TACH
Titan Acquisition Corp.

Shell Companies

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$287M
5Y Perf.-0.5%
BN
Brookfield Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • CA
Market Cap$101.14B
5Y Perf.+9.7%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+10.6%

TACH vs BN vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TACH logoTACH
BN logoBN
JPM logoJPM
IndustryShell CompaniesAsset ManagementBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$287M$101.14B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$76.58B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$5M$1.33B$57.05B
Gross Margin35.3%60.0%
Operating Margin28.3%25.9%
Forward P/E16.4x14.4x
Total Debt$74.00$312.61B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$25.00$16.24B$343.34B

TACH vs BN vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TACH
BN
JPM
StockJun 25Jun 26Return
Titan Acquisition C… (TACH)10099.5-0.5%
Brookfield Corporat… (BN)100109.7+9.7%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100110.6+10.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TACH vs BN vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Brookfield Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
TACH
Titan Acquisition Corp.
The Financial Play

TACH plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: financial services exposure
BN
Brookfield Corporation
The Banking Pick

BN is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.

  • Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs JPM's 0.3% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs JPM's 0.3%
Best for: quality and efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs BN's 290.7%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJPM logoJPM3.3% NII/revenue growth vs BN's -11.5%
ValueJPM logoJPMBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsBN logoBNEfficiency ratio 0.1% vs JPM's 0.3% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs BN's 1.58
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)JPM logoJPM+21.8% vs TACH's +3.0%
Efficiency (ROA)BN logoBNEfficiency ratio 0.1% vs JPM's 0.3%

TACH vs BN vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TACHTitan Acquisition Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

BNBrookfield Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

TACH vs BN vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGTACH

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM and TACH operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BN's 1.7%.

MetricTACH logoTACHTitan Acquisition…BN logoBNBrookfield Corpor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$76.6B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$99,706$30.9B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M$1.3B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$536,520-$7.3B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.3%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+28.3%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.7%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-9.5%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+199.3%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 82% valuation discount to BN's 90.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BN's 12.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 18.4x.

MetricTACH logoTACHTitan Acquisition…BN logoBNBrookfield Corpor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$287M$101.1B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$287M$397.5B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-246.45x90.42x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.37x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.37x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.33x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.64x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.88x
BN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $1 for BN. BN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.88x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BN scores 5/9 vs TACH's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTACH logoTACHTitan Acquisition…BN logoBNBrookfield Corpor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.4%+0.8%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.8%+0.3%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.7%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.1%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9355
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.88x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$49$296.4B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$25$16.2B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$74$312.6B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.34x0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,297 for TACH. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs TACH's +3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs TACH's 1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTACH logoTACHTitan Acquisition…BN logoBNBrookfield Corpor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1.7%-2.9%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+3.0%+15.1%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.0%+114.7%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.0%+72.2%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.0%+290.7%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.0%+29.0%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TACH and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TACH is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BN's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs BN's 91.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTACH logoTACHTitan Acquisition…BN logoBNBrookfield Corpor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.02x1.58x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.00$49.57$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.04$37.93$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.5%+91.2%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.149.759.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded32K4.7M7.0M
Evenly matched — TACH and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: BN as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.6% upside for BN (target: $57) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTACH logoTACHTitan Acquisition…BN logoBNBrookfield Corpor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$56.80$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts961
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises215
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TACH vs BN vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TACH or BN or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 5% for Brookfield Corporation (BN). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Corporation (BN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TACH or BN or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Brookfield Corporation at 90. 4x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TACH or BN or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +3. 0% for Titan Acquisition Corp. (TACH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus TACH's +3. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TACH or BN or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Titan Acquisition Corp.

(TACH) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 02β versus Brookfield Corporation's 1. 58β — meaning BN is approximately -6954% more volatile than TACH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brookfield Corporation (BN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 188% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TACH or BN or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -11. 5% for Brookfield Corporation (BN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brookfield Corporation grew EPS 141. 9% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TACH or BN or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for Titan Acquisition Corp. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BN leads at 28. 6% versus 0. 0% for TACH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TACH or BN or JPM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 16. 4x for Brookfield Corporation — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BN: 25. 6% to $56. 80.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TACH or BN or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. TACH, BN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TACH or BN or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Titan Acquisition Corp.

(TACH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 02)). Brookfield Corporation (BN) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TACH: +3. 0%, BN: +290. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TACH and BN and JPM?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TACH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while TACH, BN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.