Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
TACH vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
TACH vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $287M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $74.00 | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25.00 | $343.34B |
TACH vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Titan Acquisition C… (TACH) | 100 | 99.5 | -0.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 110.6 | +10.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TACH vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TACH is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 3.8% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs TACH's 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, current ratio 0.52x
- Beta 0.94, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.8% vs TACH's +3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.8% ROA vs JPM's 1.3% |
TACH vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TACH vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and TACH operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$99,706 | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$536,520 | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TACH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $287M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $287M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -246.45x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TACH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $8 for TACH. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs TACH's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $49 | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25 | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $74 | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,297 for TACH. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs TACH's +3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs TACH's 1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.7% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.0% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.0% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.0% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.0% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.0% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TACH and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TACH is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.00 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.04 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.5% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.1 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.9% |
TACH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
TACH vs JPM: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TACH or JPM a better buy right now?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TACH or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +3. 0% for Titan Acquisition Corp. (TACH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus TACH's +3. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TACH or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Titan Acquisition Corp.
(TACH) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 02β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -4201% more volatile than TACH relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — TACH or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for Titan Acquisition Corp. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 0. 0% for TACH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — TACH or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. TACH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is TACH or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Titan Acquisition Corp.
(TACH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 02)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TACH: +3. 0%, JPM: +465. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between TACH and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TACH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while TACH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.