Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
TACH vs KKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
TACH vs KKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $287M | $85.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $19.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $2.37B |
| Gross Margin | — | 22.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 12.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $74.00 | $54.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25.00 | $6M |
TACH vs KKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Titan Acquisition C… (TACH) | 100 | 99.5 | -0.5% |
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 72.3 | -27.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TACH vs KKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TACH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for momentum and efficiency.
- +3.0% vs KKR's -22.6%
- 3.8% ROA vs KKR's 0.6%
KKR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.8% 10Y total return vs TACH's 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.58, Low D/E 67.1%, current ratio 79.85x
- Beta 1.58, yield 0.8%, current ratio 79.85x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +3.0% vs KKR's -22.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.8% ROA vs KKR's 0.6% |
TACH vs KKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TACH vs KKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KKR and TACH operate at a comparable scale, with $19.0B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $19.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$99,706 | $9.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $2.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$536,520 | $7.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +22.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +12.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +39.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -1.7% |
Valuation Metrics
TACH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $287M | $85.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $287M | $140.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -246.45x | 41.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TACH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TACH delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $3 for KKR. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KKR scores 6/9 vs TACH's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $49 | $54.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25 | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $74 | $54.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KKR five years ago would be worth $18,012 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,297 for TACH. Over the past 12 months, TACH leads with a +3.0% total return vs KKR's -22.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KKR at 20.9% vs TACH's 1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.7% | -25.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.0% | -22.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.0% | +76.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.0% | +80.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.0% | +682.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.0% | +20.9% |
Risk & Volatility
TACH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TACH is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KKR's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TACH currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs KKR's 62.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 1.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.00 | $153.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.04 | $82.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.5% | +62.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.1 | 48.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 4.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
KKR is the only dividend payer here at 0.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $141.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
TACH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). KKR leads in 1 (Total Returns).
TACH vs KKR: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TACH or KKR a better buy right now?
KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) offers the better valuation at 41. 1x trailing P/E (16. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TACH or KKR?
Over the past 5 years, KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) delivered a total return of +80. 1%, compared to +3. 0% for Titan Acquisition Corp. (TACH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KKR returned +682. 0% versus TACH's +3. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TACH or KKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Titan Acquisition Corp.
(TACH) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 02β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning KKR is approximately -6961% more volatile than TACH relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — TACH or KKR?
KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Titan Acquisition Corp. — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KKR leads at 2. 4% versus 0. 0% for TACH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KKR leads at 41. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — TACH or KKR?
In this comparison, KKR (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. TACH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is TACH or KKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Titan Acquisition Corp.
(TACH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 02)). KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TACH: +3. 0%, KKR: +682. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between TACH and KKR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
KKR pays a dividend while TACH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.