Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
TBLA logo
TBLA
MGNI logo
MGNI
DV logo
DV
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TBLA vs MGNI vs DV vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TBLA
Taboola.com Ltd.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.30B
5Y Perf.-54.2%
MGNI
Magnite, Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.33B
5Y Perf.-52.0%
DV
DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.57B
5Y Perf.-75.9%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+52.7%

TBLA vs MGNI vs DV vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TBLA logoTBLA
MGNI logoMGNI
DV logoDV
KO logoKO
IndustryInternet Content & InformationAdvertising AgenciesSoftware - ApplicationBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$1.30B$2.33B$1.57B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$1.95B$723M$764M$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$110M$159M$55M$13.70B
Gross Margin29.7%63.4%82.2%61.7%
Operating Margin2.2%14.8%11.5%29.3%
Forward P/E10.8x15.3x20.7x25.3x
Total Debt$194M$279M$100M$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$121M$553M$259M$10.27B

TBLA vs MGNI vs DV vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TBLA
MGNI
DV
KO
StockJun 21Jun 26Return
Taboola.com Ltd. (TBLA)10045.8-54.2%
Magnite, Inc. (MGNI)10048.0-52.0%
DoubleVerify Holdin… (DV)10024.1-75.9%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100152.7+52.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TBLA vs MGNI vs DV vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TBLA and KO are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. DV also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TBLA
Taboola.com Ltd.
The Growth Play

TBLA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 187.7%, EPS growth 12.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.9%
  • 187.7% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
  • Lower P/E (10.8x vs 25.3x)
  • +33.1% vs DV's -31.6%
Best for: growth exposure
MGNI
Magnite, Inc.
The Secondary Option

MGNI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
DV
DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

DV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.76
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 8.8%, current ratio 4.27x
  • PEG 1.14 vs KO's 2.26
  • Beta 0.76, current ratio 4.27x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Long-Run Compounder

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 121.1% 10Y total return vs MGNI's 17.3%
  • 27.8% margin vs TBLA's 5.6%
  • 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 13.1% ROA vs DV's 4.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTBLA logoTBLA187.7% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueTBLA logoTBLALower P/E (10.8x vs 25.3x)
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs TBLA's 5.6%
Stability / SafetyDV logoDVBeta 0.76 vs MGNI's 1.39, lower leverage
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TBLA logoTBLA+33.1% vs DV's -31.6%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs DV's 4.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.4%

TBLA vs MGNI vs DV vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TBLATaboola.com Ltd.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.9B
MGNIMagnite, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

DVDoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

TBLA vs MGNI vs DV vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGDV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 68.2x MGNI's $723M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TBLA's 5.6%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTBLA logoTBLATaboola.com Ltd.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.DV logoDVDoubleVerify Hold…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.0B$723M$764M$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$151M$145M$148M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$110M$159M$55M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$218M$44M$135M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+29.7%+63.4%+82.2%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.2%+14.8%+11.5%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.6%+22.0%+7.2%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+11.2%+6.1%+17.7%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.1%+5.5%+9.6%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+7.7%+142.9%+3.0%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TBLA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 17.1x trailing earnings, MGNI trades at a 53% valuation discount to TBLA's 36.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DV offers better value at 1.87x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricTBLA logoTBLATaboola.com Ltd.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.DV logoDVDoubleVerify Hold…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$1.3B$2.3B$1.6B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.4B$2.1B$1.4B$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS36.46x17.11x34.00x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.81x15.28x20.74x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.87x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.51x13.55x10.35x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.68x3.26x2.09x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.67x2.71x1.50x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.93x14.05x9.07x67.15x
TBLA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $5 for DV. DV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs DV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTBLA logoTBLATaboola.com Ltd.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.DV logoDVDoubleVerify Hold…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.9%+18.6%+5.0%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.1%+5.3%+4.2%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.3%+9.5%+6.4%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.8%+7.3%+6.6%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96657
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.21x0.30x0.09x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$73M-$275M-$159M$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$121M$553M$259M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$194M$279M$100M$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense9.05x4.03x43.16x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — TBLA and KO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,721 for DV. Over the past 12 months, TBLA leads with a +33.1% total return vs DV's -31.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TBLA at 16.6% vs DV's -34.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTBLA logoTBLATaboola.com Ltd.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.DV logoDVDoubleVerify Hold…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+7.0%+1.2%-6.1%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+33.1%-7.8%-31.6%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+58.5%+22.1%-71.9%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-54.2%-48.9%-72.8%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-54.2%+17.3%-71.2%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+16.6%+6.9%-34.5%+13.7%
Evenly matched — TBLA and KO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGNI's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs DV's 60.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTBLA logoTBLATaboola.com Ltd.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.DV logoDVDoubleVerify Hold…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.00x1.39x0.76x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.26$26.65$16.82$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.84$10.82$7.64$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.1%+61.0%+60.6%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.468.451.360.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.5M2.4M2.5M12.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: TBLA as "Buy", MGNI as "Buy", DV as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.2% upside for DV (target: $13) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTBLA logoTBLATaboola.com Ltd.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.DV logoDVDoubleVerify Hold…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.55$19.25$13.38$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts12313348
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises056
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.0%+9.1%+0.2%
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TBLA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TBLA vs MGNI vs DV vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TBLA or MGNI or DV or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Taboola.

com Ltd. (TBLA) is the stronger pick with 187. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Taboola. com Ltd. (TBLA) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TBLA or MGNI or DV or KO?

On trailing P/E, Magnite, Inc.

(MGNI) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus Taboola. com Ltd. at 36. 5x. On forward P/E, Taboola. com Ltd. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. wins at 1. 14x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TBLA or MGNI or DV or KO?

Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.

6%, compared to -72. 8% for DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus DV's -71. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TBLA or MGNI or DV or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Magnite, Inc. 's 1. 39β — meaning MGNI is approximately -793% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TBLA or MGNI or DV or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Taboola.

com Ltd. (TBLA) is pulling ahead at 187. 7% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Taboola. com Ltd. grew EPS 1293% year-over-year, compared to -6. 3% for DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DV leads at 18. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TBLA or MGNI or DV or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 2. 2% for Taboola. com Ltd. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 2. 3% for TBLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DV leads at 82. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TBLA or MGNI or DV or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 14x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Taboola. com Ltd. (TBLA) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 14. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DV: 31. 2% to $13. 38.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TBLA or MGNI or DV or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield) pays a dividend. TBLA, MGNI, DV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TBLA or MGNI or DV or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, MGNI: +17. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TBLA and MGNI and DV and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (TBLA (Communication Services) and MGNI (Communication Services) and DV (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TBLA is a small-cap high-growth stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock; DV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while TBLA, MGNI, DV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.