Medical - Care Facilities
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
TOI vs USPH vs JPM vs OPCH vs ADUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
Banks - Diversified
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
TOI vs USPH vs JPM vs OPCH vs ADUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Banks - Diversified | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $5.41B | $999M | $896.00B | $3.25B | $1.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $546M | $695M | $280.33B | $5.67B | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $11M | $57.05B | $206M | $100M |
| Gross Margin | 14.8% | 22.0% | 60.0% | 18.0% | 32.5% |
| Operating Margin | -6.0% | 12.5% | 25.9% | 5.9% | 9.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.6x | 14.4x | 11.3x | 13.3x |
| Total Debt | $104M | $426M | $942.38B | $0.00 | $209M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $36M | $343.34B | $233M | $82M |
TOI vs USPH vs JPM vs OPCH vs ADUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Oncology Instit… (TOI) | 100 | 52.8 | -47.2% |
| U.S. Physical Thera… (USPH) | 100 | 80.9 | -19.1% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| Option Care Health,… (OPCH) | 100 | 149.6 | +49.6% |
| Addus HomeCare Corp… (ADUS) | 100 | 100.8 | +0.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TOI vs USPH vs JPM vs OPCH vs ADUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TOI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.8%, EPS growth 23.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.8%
- 27.8% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
- +100.4% vs OPCH's -34.9%
USPH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 2.8%
- Beta 0.89, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.01x
- 2.8% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs ADUS's 369.2%
- 20.4% margin vs TOI's -8.0%
OPCH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and stability is your priority.
- Lower P/E (11.3x vs 22.6x)
- Beta 0.29 vs TOI's 1.95
ADUS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 19.2%, current ratio 1.80x
- PEG 0.66 vs JPM's 0.81
- 7.0% ROA vs TOI's -26.5%, ROIC 8.8% vs -41.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.8% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.3x vs 22.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs TOI's -8.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs TOI's 1.95 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.4% vs OPCH's -34.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.0% ROA vs TOI's -26.5%, ROIC 8.8% vs -41.2% |
TOI vs USPH vs JPM vs OPCH vs ADUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TOI vs USPH vs JPM vs OPCH vs ADUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 1 of 6 categories
OPCH leads 1 • TOI leads 1 • USPH leads 1 • ADUS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 513.7x TOI's $546M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TOI's -8.0%. On growth, TOI holds the edge at +41.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $546M | $695M | $280.3B | $5.7B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$26M | $109M | $81.4B | $406M | $159M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | $11M | $57.0B | $206M | $100M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$26M | $67M | $100.9B | $244M | $137M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +22.0% | +60.0% | +18.0% | +32.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | +12.5% | +25.9% | +5.9% | +9.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.0% | +1.5% | +20.4% | +3.6% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | +9.6% | +36.0% | +4.3% | +9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.2% | +7.7% | — | +1.3% | +7.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +90.5% | -115.0% | +16.0% | +3.6% | +17.2% |
Valuation Metrics
OPCH leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 65% valuation discount to USPH's 46.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ADUS offers better value at 0.89x vs JPM's 0.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $999M | $896.0B | $3.2B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.5B | $1.4B | $1.50T | $3.0B | $1.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.83x | 46.17x | 16.00x | 16.35x | 17.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.64x | 14.40x | 11.31x | 13.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x | — | 0.89x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.51x | 18.36x | 7.38x | 12.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.75x | 1.28x | 3.20x | 0.57x | 1.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.29x | 2.47x | 2.56x | 1.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.37x | 8.88x | 12.57x | 16.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — OPCH and ADUS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $1 for USPH. ADUS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADUS scores 7/9 vs TOI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +1.4% | +15.9% | +15.3% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.5% | +0.9% | +1.3% | +6.0% | +7.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -41.2% | +5.6% | +4.5% | +15.3% | +8.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.7% | +7.6% | +8.9% | +12.8% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.55x | 2.60x | — | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $70M | $390M | $599.0B | -$233M | $127M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $36M | $343.3B | $233M | $82M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $104M | $426M | $942.4B | $0 | $209M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.96x | 8.24x | 0.74x | 5.50x | 14.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TOI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,257 for TOI. Over the past 12 months, TOI leads with a +100.4% total return vs OPCH's -34.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TOI at 111.1% vs USPH's -13.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +44.7% | -15.7% | -0.5% | -35.6% | -12.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +100.4% | -13.8% | +21.8% | -34.9% | -18.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +841.3% | -35.5% | +138.2% | -30.9% | +0.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.4% | -37.8% | +118.2% | +1.1% | +2.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.3% | +33.5% | +465.8% | +127.6% | +369.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +111.1% | -13.6% | +33.6% | -11.6% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TOI and OPCH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OPCH is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TOI's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TOI currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs OPCH's 56.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.95x | 0.89x | 0.94x | 0.29x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.58 | $93.50 | $337.25 | $36.80 | $124.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.02 | $58.19 | $262.71 | $18.01 | $87.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.2% | +70.1% | +95.1% | +56.4% | +75.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.3 | 53.5 | 59.1 | 44.1 | 49.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 199K | 7.0M | 3.2M | 231K |
Analyst Outlook
USPH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TOI as "Buy", USPH as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", OPCH as "Buy", ADUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.7% upside for TOI (target: $8) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, USPH offers the higher dividend yield at 2.75% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $96.00 | $339.75 | $31.22 | $122.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 13 | 61 | 14 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% | +1.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 15 | 15 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.80 | $5.95 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | +3.9% | +9.5% | 0.0% |
JPM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). OPCH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TOI vs USPH vs JPM vs OPCH vs ADUS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TOI or USPH or JPM or OPCH or ADUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Oncology Institute, Inc.
(TOI) is the stronger pick with 27. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Oncology Institute, Inc. (TOI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TOI or USPH or JPM or OPCH or ADUS?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus U. S. Physical Therapy, Inc. at 46. 2x. On forward P/E, Option Care Health, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Addus HomeCare Corporation wins at 0. 66x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TOI or USPH or JPM or OPCH or ADUS?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -47. 4% for The Oncology Institute, Inc. (TOI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus TOI's -45. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TOI or USPH or JPM or OPCH or ADUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Option Care Health, Inc.
(OPCH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus The Oncology Institute, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning TOI is approximately 580% more volatile than OPCH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TOI or USPH or JPM or OPCH or ADUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Oncology Institute, Inc.
(TOI) is pulling ahead at 27. 8% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Oncology Institute, Inc. grew EPS 23. 9% year-over-year, compared to -22. 8% for U. S. Physical Therapy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TOI leads at 25. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TOI or USPH or JPM or OPCH or ADUS?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -12. 1% for The Oncology Institute, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -7. 2% for TOI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TOI or USPH or JPM or OPCH or ADUS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 66x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Option Care Health, Inc. (OPCH) trades at 11. 3x forward P/E versus 22. 6x for U. S. Physical Therapy, Inc. — 11. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TOI: 50. 7% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TOI or USPH or JPM or OPCH or ADUS?
In this comparison, USPH (2.
8% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. TOI, OPCH, ADUS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TOI or USPH or JPM or OPCH or ADUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). The Oncology Institute, Inc. (TOI) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, TOI: -45. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TOI and USPH and JPM and OPCH and ADUS?
These companies operate in different sectors (TOI (Healthcare) and USPH (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and OPCH (Healthcare) and ADUS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TOI is a small-cap high-growth stock; USPH is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; OPCH is a small-cap deep-value stock; ADUS is a small-cap high-growth stock. USPH, JPM pay a dividend while TOI, OPCH, ADUS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.