Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
VENU logo
VENU
GOLF logo
GOLF
MODG logo
MODG
PRKS logo
PRKS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

VENU vs GOLF vs MODG vs PRKS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
VENU
Venu Holding Corporation

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalAMEX • US
Market Cap$146M
5Y Perf.-68.3%
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings Corp.

Leisure

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.75B
5Y Perf.+34.3%
MODG
Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.

Leisure

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.32B
5Y Perf.+70.4%
PRKS
United Parks & Resorts Inc.

Leisure

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.13B
5Y Perf.-23.0%

VENU vs GOLF vs MODG vs PRKS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
VENU logoVENU
GOLF logoGOLF
MODG logoMODG
PRKS logoPRKS
IndustryRestaurantsLeisureLeisureLeisure
Market Cap$146M$5.75B$2.32B$2.13B
Revenue (TTM)$15M$2.61B$4.06B$1.65B
Net Income (TTM)$-40M$171M$-1.50B$150M
Gross Margin-6.4%47.5%64.6%65.4%
Operating Margin-302.8%11.5%-31.0%20.7%
Forward P/E26.2x12.9x
Total Debt$107M$1.07B$4.14B$2.35B
Cash & Equiv.$41M$50M$445M$100M

VENU vs GOLF vs MODG vs PRKSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

VENU
GOLF
MODG
PRKS
StockNov 24Jun 26Return
Venu Holding Corpor… (VENU)10031.7-68.3%
Acushnet Holdings C… (GOLF)100134.3+34.3%
Topgolf Callaway Br… (MODG)100170.4+70.4%
United Parks & Reso… (PRKS)10077.0-23.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: VENU vs GOLF vs MODG vs PRKS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GOLF leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. United Parks & Resorts Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. MODG also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇GOLF emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
VENU
Venu Holding Corporation
The Secondary Option

VENU lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
The Income Pick

GOLF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.0%
  • Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth -8.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.1%
  • 483.9% 10Y total return vs PRKS's 186.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.94, current ratio 2.38x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MODG
Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.
The Momentum Pick

MODG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +59.4% vs VENU's -68.1%
Best for: momentum
PRKS
United Parks & Resorts Inc.
The Value Play

PRKS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.

  • Better valuation composite
  • 9.1% margin vs VENU's -262.7%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGOLF logoGOLF4.1% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6%
ValuePRKS logoPRKSBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsPRKS logoPRKS9.1% margin vs VENU's -262.7%
Stability / SafetyGOLF logoGOLFBeta 0.94 vs MODG's 1.98, lower leverage
DividendsGOLF logoGOLF1.0% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MODG logoMODG+59.4% vs VENU's -68.1%
Efficiency (ROA)GOLF logoGOLF7.0% ROA vs MODG's -19.9%, ROIC 13.3% vs -13.8%

VENU vs GOLF vs MODG vs PRKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

VENUVenu Holding Corporation
FY 2025
Food and Beverage
54.6%$10M
Event Center Ticket And Fees Revenue
33.8%$6M
Rental and Sponsorship Revenue
11.6%$2M
GOLFAcushnet Holdings Corp.
FY 2025
Footjoy Golf Wear
100.0%$570M
MODGTopgolf Callaway Brands Corp.
FY 2024
Product
57.7%$2.4B
Service
42.3%$1.8B
PRKSUnited Parks & Resorts Inc.
FY 2025
Admission
53.1%$883M
Food Merchandise And Other Revenue
46.9%$779M

VENU vs GOLF vs MODG vs PRKS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGOLFLAGGINGMODG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PRKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MODG is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 267.5x VENU's $15M. PRKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VENU's -2.6%. On growth, VENU holds the edge at +11.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricVENU logoVENUVenu Holding Corp…GOLF logoGOLFAcushnet Holdings…MODG logoMODGTopgolf Callaway …PRKS logoPRKSUnited Parks & Re…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$15M$2.6B$4.1B$1.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$39M$342M-$989M$520M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$40M$171M-$1.5B$150M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$177M$89M$35M$291M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-6.4%+47.5%+64.6%+65.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.0%+11.5%-31.0%+20.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.6%+6.5%-37.1%+9.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-11.7%+3.4%+0.8%+17.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.5%+7.1%-7.8%-3.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.6%-16.0%-3.1%-137.9%
PRKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PRKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.8x trailing earnings, PRKS trades at a 53% valuation discount to GOLF's 31.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRKS's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GOLF's 19.3x.

MetricVENU logoVENUVenu Holding Corp…GOLF logoGOLFAcushnet Holdings…MODG logoMODGTopgolf Callaway …PRKS logoPRKSUnited Parks & Re…
Market CapShares × price$146M$5.7B$2.3B$2.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$212M$6.8B$6.0B$4.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.11x31.66x-1.60x14.75x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.26.15x12.89x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.64x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.32x8.05x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.17x2.25x0.55x1.28x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.63x7.48x0.96x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF47.89x26.73x8.09x
PRKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — VENU and GOLF and PRKS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

GOLF delivers a 20.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-61 for MODG. VENU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MODG's 1.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MODG scores 6/9 vs VENU's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricVENU logoVENUVenu Holding Corp…GOLF logoGOLFAcushnet Holdings…MODG logoMODGTopgolf Callaway …PRKS logoPRKSUnited Parks & Re…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-18.7%+20.8%-60.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-11.5%+7.0%-19.9%+5.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-20.7%+13.3%-13.8%+15.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-22.7%+16.3%-16.8%+16.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94566
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.54x1.37x1.72x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$66M$1.0B$3.7B$2.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$41M$50M$445M$100M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$107M$1.1B$4.1B$2.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-4.98x3.17x-5.38x2.59x
Evenly matched — VENU and GOLF and PRKS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GOLF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GOLF five years ago would be worth $20,509 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,379 for VENU. Over the past 12 months, MODG leads with a +59.4% total return vs VENU's -68.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOLF at 25.9% vs VENU's -30.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricVENU logoVENUVenu Holding Corp…GOLF logoGOLFAcushnet Holdings…MODG logoMODGTopgolf Callaway …PRKS logoPRKSUnited Parks & Re…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-57.1%+20.2%+7.4%+24.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-68.1%+37.6%+59.4%+6.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.2%+99.7%-35.9%-24.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.2%+105.1%-63.5%-17.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.2%+483.9%+25.7%+186.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-30.3%+25.9%-13.8%-8.8%
GOLF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GOLF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GOLF is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MODG's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOLF currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs VENU's 18.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricVENU logoVENUVenu Holding Corp…GOLF logoGOLFAcushnet Holdings…MODG logoMODGTopgolf Callaway …PRKS logoPRKSUnited Parks & Re…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.79x0.94x1.98x1.47x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$18.17$104.81$16.65$56.95
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.06$69.54$7.64$28.77
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+18.8%+93.7%+75.6%+79.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.271.557.273.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded296K284K9.2M943K
GOLF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

GOLF leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: GOLF as "Hold", MODG as "Buy", PRKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.1% upside for MODG (target: $17) vs -3.5% for GOLF (target: $95). GOLF is the only dividend payer here at 0.96% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricVENU logoVENUVenu Holding Corp…GOLF logoGOLFAcushnet Holdings…MODG logoMODGTopgolf Callaway …PRKS logoPRKSUnited Parks & Re…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$94.75$16.50$49.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts212323
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1900
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.94
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.7%+1.4%+0.8%
GOLF leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

GOLF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). PRKS leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallAcushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

VENU vs GOLF vs MODG vs PRKS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is VENU or GOLF or MODG or PRKS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Acushnet Holdings Corp.

(GOLF) is the stronger pick with 4. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — VENU or GOLF or MODG or PRKS?

On trailing P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc.

(PRKS) is the cheapest at 14. 8x versus Acushnet Holdings Corp. at 31. 7x. On forward P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — VENU or GOLF or MODG or PRKS?

Over the past 5 years, Acushnet Holdings Corp.

(GOLF) delivered a total return of +105. 1%, compared to -66. 2% for Venu Holding Corporation (VENU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOLF returned +483. 9% versus VENU's -66. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — VENU or GOLF or MODG or PRKS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Acushnet Holdings Corp.

(GOLF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. 's 1. 98β — meaning MODG is approximately 111% more volatile than GOLF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Venu Holding Corporation (VENU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 172% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — VENU or GOLF or MODG or PRKS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Acushnet Holdings Corp.

(GOLF) is pulling ahead at 4. 1% versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Acushnet Holdings Corp. grew EPS -8. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1776. 6% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VENU leads at 27. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — VENU or GOLF or MODG or PRKS?

United Parks & Resorts Inc.

(PRKS) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 1% net margin versus -246. 4% for Venu Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRKS leads at 22. 3% versus -296. 3% for VENU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MODG leads at 62. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is VENU or GOLF or MODG or PRKS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, United Parks & Resorts Inc.

(PRKS) trades at 12. 9x forward P/E versus 26. 2x for Acushnet Holdings Corp. — 13. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MODG: 31. 1% to $16. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — VENU or GOLF or MODG or PRKS?

In this comparison, GOLF (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. VENU, MODG, PRKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is VENU or GOLF or MODG or PRKS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Acushnet Holdings Corp.

(GOLF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 0% yield, +483. 9% 10Y return). Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOLF: +483. 9%, MODG: +25. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between VENU and GOLF and MODG and PRKS?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: VENU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOLF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MODG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRKS is a small-cap deep-value stock. GOLF pays a dividend while VENU, MODG, PRKS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.