Restaurants
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
VENU vs GOLF vs MODG vs PRKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Leisure
Leisure
VENU vs GOLF vs MODG vs PRKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Leisure | Leisure | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $146M | $5.75B | $2.32B | $2.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15M | $2.61B | $4.06B | $1.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-40M | $171M | $-1.50B | $150M |
| Gross Margin | -6.4% | 47.5% | 64.6% | 65.4% |
| Operating Margin | -302.8% | 11.5% | -31.0% | 20.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.2x | — | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $107M | $1.07B | $4.14B | $2.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $50M | $445M | $100M |
VENU vs GOLF vs MODG vs PRKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Venu Holding Corpor… (VENU) | 100 | 31.7 | -68.3% |
| Acushnet Holdings C… (GOLF) | 100 | 134.3 | +34.3% |
| Topgolf Callaway Br… (MODG) | 100 | 170.4 | +70.4% |
| United Parks & Reso… (PRKS) | 100 | 77.0 | -23.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VENU vs GOLF vs MODG vs PRKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VENU lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GOLF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth -8.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.1%
- 483.9% 10Y total return vs PRKS's 186.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, current ratio 2.38x
MODG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +59.4% vs VENU's -68.1%
PRKS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- 9.1% margin vs VENU's -262.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.1% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.1% margin vs VENU's -262.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs MODG's 1.98, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +59.4% vs VENU's -68.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.0% ROA vs MODG's -19.9%, ROIC 13.3% vs -13.8% |
VENU vs GOLF vs MODG vs PRKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VENU vs GOLF vs MODG vs PRKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOLF leads in 3 of 6 categories
PRKS leads 2 • VENU leads 0 • MODG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MODG is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 267.5x VENU's $15M. PRKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VENU's -2.6%. On growth, VENU holds the edge at +11.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15M | $2.6B | $4.1B | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$39M | $342M | -$989M | $520M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$40M | $171M | -$1.5B | $150M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$177M | $89M | $35M | $291M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | +47.5% | +64.6% | +65.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +11.5% | -31.0% | +20.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +6.5% | -37.1% | +9.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.7% | +3.4% | +0.8% | +17.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.5% | +7.1% | -7.8% | -3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.6% | -16.0% | -3.1% | -137.9% |
Valuation Metrics
PRKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.8x trailing earnings, PRKS trades at a 53% valuation discount to GOLF's 31.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRKS's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GOLF's 19.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $146M | $5.7B | $2.3B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $212M | $6.8B | $6.0B | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.11x | 31.66x | -1.60x | 14.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.15x | — | 12.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.64x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.32x | — | 8.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.17x | 2.25x | 0.55x | 1.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.63x | 7.48x | 0.96x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 47.89x | 26.73x | 8.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — VENU and GOLF and PRKS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOLF delivers a 20.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-61 for MODG. VENU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MODG's 1.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MODG scores 6/9 vs VENU's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.7% | +20.8% | -60.8% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.5% | +7.0% | -19.9% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -20.7% | +13.3% | -13.8% | +15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -22.7% | +16.3% | -16.8% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 1.37x | 1.72x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $66M | $1.0B | $3.7B | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $50M | $445M | $100M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $107M | $1.1B | $4.1B | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.98x | 3.17x | -5.38x | 2.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOLF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOLF five years ago would be worth $20,509 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,379 for VENU. Over the past 12 months, MODG leads with a +59.4% total return vs VENU's -68.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOLF at 25.9% vs VENU's -30.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -57.1% | +20.2% | +7.4% | +24.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -68.1% | +37.6% | +59.4% | +6.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.2% | +99.7% | -35.9% | -24.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.2% | +105.1% | -63.5% | -17.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.2% | +483.9% | +25.7% | +186.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.3% | +25.9% | -13.8% | -8.8% |
Risk & Volatility
GOLF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOLF is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MODG's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOLF currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs VENU's 18.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 0.94x | 1.98x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.17 | $104.81 | $16.65 | $56.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.06 | $69.54 | $7.64 | $28.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.8% | +93.7% | +75.6% | +79.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.2 | 71.5 | 57.2 | 73.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 296K | 284K | 9.2M | 943K |
Analyst Outlook
GOLF leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOLF as "Hold", MODG as "Buy", PRKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.1% upside for MODG (target: $17) vs -3.5% for GOLF (target: $95). GOLF is the only dividend payer here at 0.96% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $94.75 | $16.50 | $49.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 | 23 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.7% | +1.4% | +0.8% |
GOLF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). PRKS leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
VENU vs GOLF vs MODG vs PRKS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VENU or GOLF or MODG or PRKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Acushnet Holdings Corp.
(GOLF) is the stronger pick with 4. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VENU or GOLF or MODG or PRKS?
On trailing P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) is the cheapest at 14. 8x versus Acushnet Holdings Corp. at 31. 7x. On forward P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VENU or GOLF or MODG or PRKS?
Over the past 5 years, Acushnet Holdings Corp.
(GOLF) delivered a total return of +105. 1%, compared to -66. 2% for Venu Holding Corporation (VENU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOLF returned +483. 9% versus VENU's -66. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VENU or GOLF or MODG or PRKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Acushnet Holdings Corp.
(GOLF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. 's 1. 98β — meaning MODG is approximately 111% more volatile than GOLF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Venu Holding Corporation (VENU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 172% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VENU or GOLF or MODG or PRKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Acushnet Holdings Corp.
(GOLF) is pulling ahead at 4. 1% versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Acushnet Holdings Corp. grew EPS -8. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1776. 6% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VENU leads at 27. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VENU or GOLF or MODG or PRKS?
United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 1% net margin versus -246. 4% for Venu Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRKS leads at 22. 3% versus -296. 3% for VENU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MODG leads at 62. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VENU or GOLF or MODG or PRKS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) trades at 12. 9x forward P/E versus 26. 2x for Acushnet Holdings Corp. — 13. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MODG: 31. 1% to $16. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — VENU or GOLF or MODG or PRKS?
In this comparison, GOLF (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. VENU, MODG, PRKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VENU or GOLF or MODG or PRKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Acushnet Holdings Corp.
(GOLF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 0% yield, +483. 9% 10Y return). Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOLF: +483. 9%, MODG: +25. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VENU and GOLF and MODG and PRKS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VENU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOLF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MODG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRKS is a small-cap deep-value stock. GOLF pays a dividend while VENU, MODG, PRKS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.