Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
VET vs OVV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
VET vs OVV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $1.71B | $16.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.81B | $8.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-814M | $771M |
| Gross Margin | 35.9% | 47.0% |
| Operating Margin | 20.2% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 11.2x | 7.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.30B | $7.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $35M |
VET vs OVV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vermilion Energy In… (VET) | 100 | 250.0 | +150.0% |
| Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) | 100 | 601.6 | +501.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VET vs OVV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VET is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta -0.18, yield 4.1%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.18, Low D/E 58.6%, current ratio 0.84x
- Beta -0.18, yield 4.1%, current ratio 0.84x
OVV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth 13.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.2%
- 60.7% 10Y total return vs VET's -39.7%
- -4.5% revenue growth vs VET's -15.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.5% revenue growth vs VET's -15.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.3x vs 11.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.6% margin vs VET's -44.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (58.6% vs 67.3%) | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs OVV's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs OVV's +44.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.8% ROA vs VET's -13.8%, ROIC 8.0% vs 3.5% |
VET vs OVV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VET vs OVV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OVV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OVV is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.9B annually — 4.9x VET's $1.8B. OVV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VET's -44.9%. On growth, OVV holds the edge at +6.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $8.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$814M | $771M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $301M | $3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.9% | +47.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -44.9% | +8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +42.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.4% | +6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.9% | -2.9% |
Valuation Metrics
VET leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, VET's 3.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OVV's 5.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $16.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $23.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.68x | 12.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.20x | 7.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.92x | 5.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.35x | 1.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.32x | 10.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OVV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OVV delivers a 7.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-34 for VET. VET carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OVV's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OVV scores 6/9 vs VET's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.7% | +7.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.8% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.5% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +11.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $7.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $35M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $7.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.53x | 1.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OVV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OVV five years ago would be worth $20,546 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,136 for VET. Over the past 12 months, VET leads with a +45.6% total return vs OVV's +44.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OVV at 17.5% vs VET's 1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.7% | +42.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.6% | +44.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.0% | +62.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.4% | +105.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.7% | +60.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.3% | +17.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VET and OVV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VET is the less volatile stock with a -0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OVV's -0.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OVV currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs VET's 75.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.18x | -0.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.82 | $63.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.00 | $35.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.2% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 45.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
VET leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VET as "Hold" and OVV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.4% upside for OVV (target: $66) vs -3.7% for VET (target: $11). For income investors, VET offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs OVV's 2.06%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.74 | $65.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.64 | $1.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +1.9% |
OVV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VET leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
VET vs OVV: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VET or OVV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ovintiv Inc.
(OVV) is the stronger pick with -4. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 0% for Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET). Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ovintiv Inc. (OVV) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VET or OVV?
On forward P/E, Ovintiv Inc.
is actually cheaper at 7. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VET or OVV?
Over the past 5 years, Ovintiv Inc.
(OVV) delivered a total return of +105. 5%, compared to +41. 4% for Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OVV returned +60. 7% versus VET's -39. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VET or OVV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vermilion Energy Inc.
(VET) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 18β versus Ovintiv Inc. 's -0. 10β — meaning OVV is approximately -48% more volatile than VET relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 67% for Ovintiv Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VET or OVV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ovintiv Inc.
(OVV) is pulling ahead at -4. 5% versus -15. 0% for Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ovintiv Inc. grew EPS 13. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1313. 3% for Vermilion Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OVV leads at -11. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VET or OVV?
Ovintiv Inc.
(OVV) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 2% net margin versus -37. 0% for Vermilion Energy Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OVV leads at 21. 6% versus 9. 5% for VET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OVV leads at 28. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VET or OVV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ovintiv Inc.
(OVV) trades at 7. 3x forward P/E versus 11. 2x for Vermilion Energy Inc. — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OVV: 14. 4% to $65. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — VET or OVV?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 2. 1% for Ovintiv Inc. (OVV).
09Is VET or OVV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vermilion Energy Inc.
(VET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 18), 4. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VET: -39. 7%, OVV: +60. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VET and OVV?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VET is a small-cap income-oriented stock; OVV is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.