Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
VSTM vs TGTX vs JPM vs RCUS vs IMVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
VSTM vs TGTX vs JPM vs RCUS vs IMVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $284M | $7.58B | $896.00B | $2.40B | $6.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $50M | $700M | $280.33B | $236M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-194M | $462M | $57.05B | $-369M | $-506M |
| Gross Margin | 83.7% | 83.0% | 60.0% | 90.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -344.6% | 21.3% | 25.9% | -168.6% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 35.9x | 14.4x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $77M | $261M | $942.38B | $99M | $72K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $205M | $79M | $343.34B | $222M | $902M |
VSTM vs TGTX vs JPM vs RCUS vs IMVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Verastem, Inc. (VSTM) | 100 | 19.9 | -80.1% |
| TG Therapeutics, In… (TGTX) | 100 | 254.2 | +154.2% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 96.2 | -3.8% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 138.1 | +38.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VSTM vs TGTX vs JPM vs RCUS vs IMVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VSTM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 209.1% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
TGTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 87.3%, EPS growth 17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 40.2%, current ratio 4.10x
- Beta 0.65, current ratio 4.10x
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- Better valuation composite
- 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
RCUS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +154.5% vs VSTM's -30.3%
Among these 5 stocks, IMVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 209.1% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 66.0% margin vs VSTM's -391.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs RCUS's 2.00 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +154.5% vs VSTM's -30.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.8% ROA vs VSTM's -91.6% |
VSTM vs TGTX vs JPM vs RCUS vs IMVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VSTM vs TGTX vs JPM vs RCUS vs IMVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TGTX leads in 3 of 6 categories
JPM leads 2 • VSTM leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. TGTX is the more profitable business, keeping 66.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VSTM's -3.9%. On growth, TGTX holds the edge at +69.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $50M | $700M | $280.3B | $236M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$170M | $150M | $81.4B | -$391M | -$532M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$194M | $462M | $57.0B | -$369M | -$506M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$151M | -$14M | $100.9B | -$489M | -$407M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.7% | +83.0% | +60.0% | +90.7% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +21.3% | +25.9% | -168.6% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | +66.0% | +20.4% | -156.4% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | -2.0% | +36.0% | -2.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +69.6% | — | -39.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.5% | +2.9% | +16.0% | +10.5% | -14.1% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 11% valuation discount to TGTX's 17.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JPM's 18.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TGTX's 62.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $284M | $7.6B | $896.0B | $2.4B | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $156M | $7.8B | $1.50T | $2.3B | $6.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.36x | 17.88x | 16.00x | -7.23x | -12.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 35.88x | 14.40x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 62.82x | 18.36x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.19x | 12.30x | 3.20x | 9.70x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.97x | 12.33x | 2.47x | 4.05x | 7.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.88x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGTX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGTX delivers a 87.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $87 in annual profit, vs $-5 for VSTM. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.9% | +87.4% | +15.9% | -69.0% | -68.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -91.6% | +42.8% | +1.3% | -35.3% | -62.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +16.4% | +4.5% | -64.1% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -139.0% | +17.7% | +8.9% | -42.1% | -68.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.34x | 0.40x | 2.60x | 0.16x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$128M | $182M | $599.0B | -$123M | -$902M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $205M | $79M | $343.3B | $222M | $902M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $77M | $261M | $942.4B | $99M | $72,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -208.73x | 5.67x | 0.74x | -13.38x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TGTX and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $722 for VSTM. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +154.5% total return vs VSTM's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs VSTM's -25.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -43.3% | +69.1% | -0.5% | +2.2% | +29.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.3% | +32.5% | +21.8% | +154.5% | +110.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.5% | +89.0% | +138.2% | +18.3% | +55.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.8% | +29.3% | +118.2% | -3.1% | +213.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.2% | +605.4% | +465.8% | +40.0% | +237.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.4% | +23.6% | +33.6% | +5.8% | +15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
TGTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TGTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TGTX currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs VSTM's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 0.65x | 0.94x | 2.00x | 1.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.25 | $50.41 | $337.25 | $28.72 | $36.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.55 | $25.28 | $262.71 | $7.91 | $14.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.4% | +98.2% | +95.1% | +82.9% | +92.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.7 | 76.1 | 59.1 | 46.5 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 2.0M | 7.0M | 1.1M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VSTM as "Buy", TGTX as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 345.1% upside for VSTM (target: $18) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.25 | $54.50 | $339.75 | $31.00 | $43.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 13 | 61 | 18 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 15 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | +3.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TGTX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
VSTM vs TGTX vs JPM vs RCUS vs IMVT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VSTM or TGTX or JPM or RCUS or IMVT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Verastem, Inc.
(VSTM) is the stronger pick with 209. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Verastem, Inc. (VSTM) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VSTM or TGTX or JPM or RCUS or IMVT?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus TG Therapeutics, Inc. at 17. 9x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VSTM or TGTX or JPM or RCUS or IMVT?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -92. 8% for Verastem, Inc. (VSTM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGTX returned +605. 4% versus VSTM's -75. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VSTM or TGTX or JPM or RCUS or IMVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 2. 00β — meaning RCUS is approximately 207% more volatile than TGTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VSTM or TGTX or JPM or RCUS or IMVT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Verastem, Inc.
(VSTM) is pulling ahead at 209. 1% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TG Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 1747% year-over-year, compared to -4. 8% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGTX leads at 504. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VSTM or TGTX or JPM or RCUS or IMVT?
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 6% net margin versus -677. 6% for Verastem, Inc. — meaning it keeps 72. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -550. 3% for VSTM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VSTM or TGTX or JPM or RCUS or IMVT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 35. 9x for TG Therapeutics, Inc. — 21. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VSTM: 345. 1% to $18. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — VSTM or TGTX or JPM or RCUS or IMVT?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. VSTM, TGTX, RCUS, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VSTM or TGTX or JPM or RCUS or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, RCUS: +40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VSTM and TGTX and JPM and RCUS and IMVT?
These companies operate in different sectors (VSTM (Healthcare) and TGTX (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and RCUS (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VSTM is a small-cap high-growth stock; TGTX is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JPM pays a dividend while VSTM, TGTX, RCUS, IMVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.