Oil & Gas Energy
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
WBI vs HESM vs DKL vs NCSM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
WBI vs HESM vs DKL vs NCSM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Energy | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $1.43B | $8.05B | $2.86B | $142M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $548M | $1.62B | $1.06B | $180M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $353M | $170M | $19M |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 75.0% | 19.2% | 36.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 62.2% | 16.5% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | 62.5x | 13.1x | 15.2x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $3.77B | $35M | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $52M | $2M | $11M | $37M |
WBI vs HESM vs DKL vs NCSM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hess Midstream LP (HESM) | 100 | 210.1 | +110.1% |
| Delek Logistics Par… (DKL) | 100 | 231.2 | +131.2% |
| NCS Multistage Hold… (NCSM) | 100 | 470.0 | +370.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WBI vs HESM vs DKL vs NCSM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WBI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HESM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 124.3% 10Y total return vs DKL's 250.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, current ratio 0.85x
- Lower P/E (13.1x vs 15.2x)
- 21.8% margin vs WBI's 2.9%
DKL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.25, yield 8.3%
- Beta 0.25, yield 8.3%, current ratio 1.12x
- 8.3% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs HESM's 7.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
NCSM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 239.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.9%
- 13.6% revenue growth vs DKL's 7.7%
- +78.7% vs HESM's +6.1%
- 11.4% ROA vs WBI's 0.4%, ROIC 7.9% vs 3.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.6% revenue growth vs DKL's 7.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.1x vs 15.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.8% margin vs WBI's 2.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs NCSM's 0.32 | |
| Dividends | 8.3% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs HESM's 7.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.7% vs HESM's +6.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs WBI's 0.4%, ROIC 7.9% vs 3.3% |
WBI vs HESM vs DKL vs NCSM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WBI vs HESM vs DKL vs NCSM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WBI leads in 2 of 6 categories
HESM leads 1 • NCSM leads 1 • DKL leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HESM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HESM is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 9.0x NCSM's $180M. HESM is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBI's 2.9%. On growth, DKL holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $548M | $1.6B | $1.1B | $180M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $249M | $1.2B | $310M | $15M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $353M | $170M | $19M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$135M | $585M | $112M | $24M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +75.0% | +19.2% | +36.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +62.2% | +16.5% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +21.8% | +16.0% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -24.6% | +36.1% | +10.6% | +13.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.8% | +2.3% | +19.0% | -8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +5.9% | -17.8% | -109.3% |
Valuation Metrics
WBI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.2x trailing earnings, NCSM trades at a 62% valuation discount to DKL's 16.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WBI's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HESM's 9.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $8.0B | $2.9B | $142M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $11.8B | $2.9B | $118M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -305.00x | 13.51x | 16.31x | 6.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 62.49x | 13.09x | 15.17x | 15.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.80x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.35x | 9.67x | 9.28x | 6.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.73x | 4.96x | 2.82x | 0.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | 10.86x | 471.32x | 1.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.05x | — | 6.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WBI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DKL delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $1 for WBI. WBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HESM's 8.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WBI scores 7/9 vs DKL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.9% | +74.9% | +19.2% | +14.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +8.1% | +6.1% | +11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +18.6% | +14.1% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +24.8% | +8.3% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 8.61x | 5.75x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$39M | $3.8B | $24M | -$24M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52M | $2M | $11M | $37M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $3.8B | $35M | $13M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.30x | 4.54x | 1.66x | 28.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NCSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HESM five years ago would be worth $19,718 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,148 for WBI. Over the past 12 months, NCSM leads with a +78.7% total return vs HESM's +6.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NCSM at 42.8% vs WBI's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.5% | +15.9% | +19.3% | +36.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.5% | +6.1% | +36.7% | +78.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | +61.8% | +28.0% | +191.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | +97.2% | +69.0% | +76.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | +124.3% | +250.8% | -86.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.7% | +17.4% | +8.6% | +42.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HESM and DKL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HESM is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NCSM's 0.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DKL currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs NCSM's 61.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 0.08x | 0.25x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.90 | $44.14 | $55.89 | $87.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.18 | $31.63 | $41.72 | $28.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +87.5% | +96.3% | +61.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 49.7 | 55.7 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 599K | 1.6M | 50K | 39K |
Analyst Outlook
DKL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WBI as "Buy", HESM as "Hold", DKL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.5% upside for WBI (target: $34) vs -9.4% for HESM (target: $35). For income investors, DKL offers the higher dividend yield at 8.26% vs HESM's 7.36%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.00 | $35.00 | $56.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 9 | 10 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.4% | +8.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 9 | 13 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.84 | $4.45 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.0% | +0.3% | +0.2% |
WBI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HESM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
WBI vs HESM vs DKL vs NCSM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WBI or HESM or DKL or NCSM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the stronger pick with 13. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 7% for Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL). NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) offers the better valuation at 6. 2x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WBI or HESM or DKL or NCSM?
On trailing P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the cheapest at 6. 2x versus Delek Logistics Partners, LP at 16. 3x. On forward P/E, Hess Midstream LP is actually cheaper at 13. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WBI or HESM or DKL or NCSM?
Over the past 5 years, Hess Midstream LP (HESM) delivered a total return of +97.
2%, compared to +21. 5% for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DKL returned +247. 8% versus NCSM's -86. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WBI or HESM or DKL or NCSM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hess Midstream LP (HESM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
08β versus NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 39β — meaning NCSM is approximately 405% more volatile than HESM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 9% for Hess Midstream LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WBI or HESM or DKL or NCSM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is pulling ahead at 13. 6% versus 7. 7% for Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 239. 2% year-over-year, compared to 10. 4% for Delek Logistics Partners, LP. Over a 3-year CAGR, HESM leads at 8. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WBI or HESM or DKL or NCSM?
Hess Midstream LP (HESM) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
8% net margin versus -0. 9% for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HESM leads at 62. 2% versus 6. 4% for NCSM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HESM leads at 63. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WBI or HESM or DKL or NCSM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hess Midstream LP (HESM) trades at 13.
1x forward P/E versus 62. 5x for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC — 49. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WBI: 11. 5% to $34. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WBI or HESM or DKL or NCSM?
In this comparison, DKL (8.
3% yield), HESM (7. 4% yield) pay a dividend. WBI, NCSM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WBI or HESM or DKL or NCSM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hess Midstream LP (HESM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
08), 7. 4% yield, +123. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HESM: +123. 8%, WBI: +29. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WBI and HESM and DKL and NCSM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HESM is a small-cap deep-value stock; DKL is a small-cap deep-value stock; NCSM is a small-cap deep-value stock. HESM, DKL pay a dividend while WBI, NCSM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.