Oil & Gas Energy
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
WBI vs NCSM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
WBI vs NCSM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Energy | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $1.43B | $142M | $355.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $548M | $180M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $19M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 36.7% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 5.2% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 62.5x | 15.9x | 25.2x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $13M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $52M | $37M | $10.27B |
WBI vs NCSM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCS Multistage Hold… (NCSM) | 100 | 470.0 | +370.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WBI vs NCSM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WBI is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Lower D/E ratio (0.7% vs 132.7%)
NCSM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 239.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 4.27x
- Beta 0.32, current ratio 4.27x
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.15, yield 2.5%
- 120.9% 10Y total return vs NCSM's -86.5%
- 27.8% margin vs WBI's 2.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.6% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 25.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs WBI's 2.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (0.7% vs 132.7%) | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.7% vs KO's +17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs WBI's 0.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.3% |
WBI vs NCSM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WBI vs NCSM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 274.4x NCSM's $180M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBI's 2.9%. On growth, WBI holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $548M | $180M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $249M | $15M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $19M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$135M | $24M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +36.7% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +5.2% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +10.8% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -24.6% | +13.2% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.8% | -8.7% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -109.3% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — WBI and NCSM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.2x trailing earnings, NCSM trades at a 77% valuation discount to KO's 27.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WBI's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KO's 26.4x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $142M | $355.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $118M | $390.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -305.00x | 6.24x | 27.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 62.49x | 15.91x | 25.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.35x | 6.67x | 26.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.73x | 0.77x | 7.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | 1.04x | 10.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.76x | 67.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $1 for WBI. WBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WBI scores 7/9 vs NCSM's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.9% | +14.4% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +11.4% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +7.9% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +8.4% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.09x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$39M | -$24M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52M | $37M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $13M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.30x | 28.21x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NCSM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NCSM five years ago would be worth $17,685 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,148 for WBI. Over the past 12 months, NCSM leads with a +78.7% total return vs KO's +17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NCSM at 42.8% vs WBI's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.5% | +36.2% | +20.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.5% | +78.7% | +17.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | +191.0% | +46.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | +76.9% | +63.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | -86.5% | +120.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.7% | +42.8% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NCSM's 0.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs NCSM's 61.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 0.39x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.90 | $87.36 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.18 | $28.73 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +61.8% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 53.2 | 65.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 599K | 39K | 12.6M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WBI as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.5% upside for WBI (target: $34) vs 4.6% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.00 | — | $86.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | — | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NCSM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
WBI vs NCSM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WBI or NCSM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the stronger pick with 13. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) offers the better valuation at 6. 2x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WBI or NCSM or KO?
On trailing P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the cheapest at 6. 2x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 1x. On forward P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WBI or NCSM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) delivered a total return of +76. 9%, compared to +21. 5% for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus NCSM's -86. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WBI or NCSM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 39β — meaning NCSM is approximately -295% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WBI or NCSM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is pulling ahead at 13. 6% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 239. 2% year-over-year, compared to 23. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, NCSM leads at 5. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WBI or NCSM or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -0. 9% for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 6. 4% for NCSM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WBI or NCSM or KO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 62. 5x for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC — 46. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WBI: 11. 5% to $34. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WBI or NCSM or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. WBI, NCSM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WBI or NCSM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, WBI: +29. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WBI and NCSM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (WBI (Energy) and NCSM (Energy) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NCSM is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while WBI, NCSM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.