Oil & Gas Energy
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
WBI vs NCSM vs WTTR vs BKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Regulated Water
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
WBI vs NCSM vs WTTR vs BKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Energy | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Regulated Water | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $1.43B | $142M | $2.08B | $62.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $548M | $180M | $1.40B | $27.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $19M | $22M | $3.12B |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 36.7% | 18.2% | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 5.2% | 2.3% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 62.5x | 15.9x | 34.8x | 26.4x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $13M | $374M | $7.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $52M | $37M | $18M | $3.71B |
WBI vs NCSM vs WTTR vs BKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCS Multistage Hold… (NCSM) | 100 | 470.0 | +370.0% |
| Select Water Soluti… (WTTR) | 100 | 385.9 | +285.9% |
| Baker Hughes Company (BKR) | 100 | 410.3 | +310.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WBI vs NCSM vs WTTR vs BKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WBI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NCSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 239.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 4.27x
- Beta 0.32, current ratio 4.27x
- 13.6% revenue growth vs WTTR's -3.1%
WTTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.05, yield 1.8%
- 1.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs BKR's 1.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +102.2% vs WBI's +21.5%
BKR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 178.2% 10Y total return vs WTTR's 38.4%
- 11.2% margin vs WTTR's 1.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.6% revenue growth vs WTTR's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 26.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.2% margin vs WTTR's 1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs WTTR's 1.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs BKR's 1.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.2% vs WBI's +21.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs WBI's 0.4%, ROIC 7.9% vs 3.3% |
WBI vs NCSM vs WTTR vs BKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WBI vs NCSM vs WTTR vs BKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WTTR leads in 2 of 6 categories
BKR leads 1 • WBI leads 1 • NCSM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKR is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.9B annually — 155.3x NCSM's $180M. BKR is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WTTR's 1.5%. On growth, WBI holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $548M | $180M | $1.4B | $27.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $249M | $15M | $217M | $4.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $19M | $22M | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$135M | $24M | -$95M | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +36.7% | +18.2% | +23.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +5.2% | +2.3% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +10.8% | +1.5% | +11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -24.6% | +13.2% | -6.8% | +9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.8% | -8.7% | -2.3% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -109.3% | -4.4% | +132.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — WBI and NCSM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.2x trailing earnings, NCSM trades at a 93% valuation discount to WTTR's 92.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WBI's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKR's 14.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $142M | $2.1B | $63.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $118M | $2.4B | $66.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -305.00x | 6.24x | 92.40x | 24.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 62.49x | 15.91x | 34.83x | 26.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.35x | 6.67x | 11.58x | 13.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.73x | 0.77x | 1.48x | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | 1.04x | 2.07x | 3.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.76x | — | 24.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WBI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKR delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $1 for WBI. WBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WTTR's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WBI scores 7/9 vs WTTR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.9% | +14.4% | +2.2% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +11.4% | +1.3% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +7.9% | +2.3% | +12.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +8.4% | +2.9% | +13.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.09x | 0.40x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$39M | -$24M | $356M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52M | $37M | $18M | $3.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $13M | $374M | $7.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.30x | 28.21x | 1.54x | 9.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WTTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WTTR five years ago would be worth $28,970 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,148 for WBI. Over the past 12 months, WTTR leads with a +102.2% total return vs WBI's +21.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NCSM at 42.8% vs WBI's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.5% | +36.2% | +67.9% | +35.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.5% | +78.7% | +102.2% | +65.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | +191.0% | +140.7% | +121.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | +76.9% | +189.7% | +160.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | -86.5% | +38.4% | +178.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.7% | +42.8% | +34.0% | +30.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WBI and NCSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NCSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WTTR's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBI currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs NCSM's 61.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 0.39x | 1.05x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.90 | $87.36 | $20.48 | $70.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.18 | $28.73 | $7.86 | $37.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +61.8% | +90.2% | +90.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 53.2 | 52.3 | 45.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 599K | 39K | 1.6M | 7.3M |
Analyst Outlook
WTTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WBI as "Buy", WTTR as "Buy", BKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.0% upside for WTTR (target: $22) vs 11.5% for WBI (target: $34). For income investors, WTTR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.75% vs BKR's 1.44%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.00 | — | $22.00 | $73.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | — | 15 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.8% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.32 | $0.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.4% | +0.6% |
WTTR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). BKR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
WBI vs NCSM vs WTTR vs BKR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WBI or NCSM or WTTR or BKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the stronger pick with 13. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR). NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) offers the better valuation at 6. 2x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WBI or NCSM or WTTR or BKR?
On trailing P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the cheapest at 6. 2x versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. at 92. 4x. On forward P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WBI or NCSM or WTTR or BKR?
Over the past 5 years, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) delivered a total return of +189. 7%, compared to +21. 5% for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKR returned +177. 2% versus NCSM's -86. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WBI or NCSM or WTTR or BKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 05β — meaning WTTR is approximately 170% more volatile than NCSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 40% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WBI or NCSM or WTTR or BKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is pulling ahead at 13. 6% versus -3. 1% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 239. 2% year-over-year, compared to -33. 3% for Select Water Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BKR leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WBI or NCSM or WTTR or BKR?
NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -0. 9% for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WBI leads at 15. 0% versus 2. 5% for WTTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NCSM leads at 38. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WBI or NCSM or WTTR or BKR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 62. 5x for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC — 46. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WTTR: 19. 0% to $22. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WBI or NCSM or WTTR or BKR?
In this comparison, WTTR (1.
8% yield), BKR (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. WBI, NCSM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WBI or NCSM or WTTR or BKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 1. 4% yield, +177. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKR: +177. 2%, WBI: +29. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WBI and NCSM and WTTR and BKR?
These companies operate in different sectors (WBI (Energy) and NCSM (Energy) and WTTR (Utilities) and BKR (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NCSM is a small-cap deep-value stock; WTTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WTTR, BKR pay a dividend while WBI, NCSM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.