Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) vs Apple Inc. (AAPL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AAPL | 6.4% revenue growth vs WDS's -1.5% |
| Value | WDS | Lower P/E (29.8x vs 31.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | AAPL | 27.0% net margin vs WDS's 24.1% |
| Stability / Safety | WDS | Beta 0.82 vs AAPL's 1.28, lower leverage |
| Dividends | WDS | 5.1% yield, vs AAPL's 0.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | WDS | +40.1% vs AAPL's +9.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AAPL | 31.1% ROA vs WDS's 9.5%, ROIC 64.5% vs 6.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Woodside Energy Group is an Australian oil and gas company that explores for, develops, and produces hydrocarbons — primarily liquefied natural gas (LNG) and crude oil — from assets across Australia, Asia, Africa, and the Americas. It generates revenue by selling LNG (its largest segment), pipeline gas, crude oil, condensate, and liquefied petroleum gas, with LNG exports to Asia being the dominant earnings driver. The company's competitive advantage lies in its ownership of large-scale, low-cost LNG production assets in Australia — particularly the North West Shelf and Pluto projects — which benefit from proximity to major Asian energy markets.
Apple is a technology giant that designs and sells premium consumer electronics — most famously the iPhone — along with related software and services. It generates revenue primarily from hardware sales (roughly 80% of total) and a fast-growing services segment (around 20%) that includes the App Store, subscriptions, and licensing. Its key competitive advantage is a powerful ecosystem that locks users into its hardware, software, and services through seamless integration and high switching costs.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AAPL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WDS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $435.6B annually — 16.7x WDS's $26.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 27.0% (AAPL) to 24.1% (WDS). On growth, AAPL holds the edge at +15.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26.2B | $435.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18.6B | $152.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.3B | $117.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.5B | $123.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.8% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +32.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +27.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +28.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.1% | +15.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.1% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, WDS trades at a 59% valuation discount to AAPL's 35.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WDS's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AAPL's 27.5x.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38.9B | $3.88T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $46.9B | $3.97T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.42x | 35.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.82x | 31.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.99x | 27.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.00x | 9.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 53.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 133.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $134 in annual profit, vs $16 for WDS. WDS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 7/9 vs WDS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.8% | +133.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.5% | +31.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +64.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 1.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.0B | $89.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.7B | $33.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.7B | $123.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 109.20x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $21,049 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,004 for WDS. Over the past 12 months, WDS leads with a +40.1% total return vs AAPL's +9.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAPL at 21.9% vs WDS's 0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.1% | -2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.1% | +9.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.5% | +81.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.0% | +110.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.3% | +1027.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.8% | +21.9% |
Risk & Volatility
WDS is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAPL's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WDS currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs AAPL's 91.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.51 | $288.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.26 | $169.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +91.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.6 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 777K | 40.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WDS as "Hold" and AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.7% upside for WDS (target: $28) vs 14.7% for AAPL (target: $303). For income investors, WDS offers the higher dividend yield at 5.13% vs AAPL's 0.39%.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.00 | $303.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 109 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.1% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.05 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.3% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 100 | 91.8 | -8.2% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 361.46 | +261.5% |
Apple Inc. (AAPL) returned +110% over 5 years vs Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS)'s +40%. A $10,000 investment in AAPL 5 years ago would be worth $21,049 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | $4.1B | $13.0B | +218.6% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | $215.6B | $416.2B | +93.0% |
Woodside Energy Group Ltd's revenue grew from $4.1B (2016) to $13.0B (2025) — a 13.7% CAGR. Apple Inc.'s revenue grew from $215.6B (2016) to $416.2B (2025) — a 7.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 21.3% | 20.9% | -1.7% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 21.2% | 26.9% | +27.0% |
Woodside Energy Group Ltd's net margin went from 21% (2016) to 21% (2025). Apple Inc.'s net margin went from 21% (2016) to 27% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 20.9 | 11 | -47.4% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 18.4 | 36.4 | +97.8% |
Woodside Energy Group Ltd has traded in a 6x–65x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~14x. Apple Inc. has traded in a 13x–41x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~35x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 1.04 | 1.42 | +36.5% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 2.08 | 7.46 | +258.7% |
Woodside Energy Group Ltd's EPS grew from $1.04 (2016) to $1.42 (2025) — a 4% CAGR. Apple Inc.'s EPS grew from $2.08 (2016) to $7.46 (2025) — a 15% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Woodside Energy Group Ltd generated $-782M FCF in 2025 (-167% vs 2021). Apple Inc. generated $99B FCF in 2025 (+6% vs 2021).
WDS vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WDS or AAPL a better buy right now?
Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) offers the better valuation at 14.4x trailing P/E (29.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Apple Inc. (AAPL) a "Buy" — based on 109 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WDS or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is the cheapest at 14.4x versus Apple Inc. at 35.4x. On forward P/E, Woodside Energy Group Ltd is actually cheaper at 29.8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WDS or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc. (AAPL) delivered a total return of +110.5%, compared to +40.0% for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS). A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth approximately $21K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1027% versus WDS's +74.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WDS or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.82β versus Apple Inc.'s 1.28β — meaning AAPL is approximately 55% more volatile than WDS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 167% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — WDS or AAPL?
Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26.9% net margin versus 20.9% for Woodside Energy Group Ltd — meaning it keeps 26.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32.0% versus 29.8% for WDS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAPL leads at 46.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is WDS or AAPL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) trades at 29.8x forward P/E versus 31.1x for Apple Inc. — 1.3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WDS: 36.7% to $28.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — WDS or AAPL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) offers the highest yield at 5.1%, versus 0.4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL).
08Is WDS or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.82), 5.1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WDS: +74.3%, AAPL: +1027%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between WDS and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (WDS (Energy) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced. In terms of investment character: WDS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. WDS pays a dividend while AAPL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.