Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) vs ConocoPhillips (COP) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | COP | 9.3% revenue growth vs WDS's -1.5% |
| Value | COP | Lower P/E (23.0x vs 29.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | WDS | 24.1% net margin vs COP's 13.3% |
| Stability / Safety | WDS | Beta 0.82 vs COP's 0.99, lower leverage |
| Dividends | WDS | 5.1% yield, vs COP's 2.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | WDS | +40.1% vs COP's +17.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WDS | 9.5% ROA vs COP's 6.5%, ROIC 6.3% vs 10.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Woodside Energy Group is an Australian oil and gas company that explores for, develops, and produces hydrocarbons — primarily liquefied natural gas (LNG) and crude oil — from assets across Australia, Asia, Africa, and the Americas. It generates revenue by selling LNG (its largest segment), pipeline gas, crude oil, condensate, and liquefied petroleum gas, with LNG exports to Asia being the dominant earnings driver. The company's competitive advantage lies in its ownership of large-scale, low-cost LNG production assets in Australia — particularly the North West Shelf and Pluto projects — which benefit from proximity to major Asian energy markets.
ConocoPhillips is a global independent exploration and production company that finds, produces, and sells crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. It generates revenue primarily from selling hydrocarbons produced from its diverse portfolio — including unconventional shale plays in North America, conventional assets worldwide, and oil sands in Canada — with no refining or marketing operations. The company's competitive advantage lies in its low-cost position, large-scale resource base, and operational expertise across multiple geographies and resource types.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
WDS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). COP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
COP is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.7B annually — 2.3x WDS's $26.2B. WDS is the more profitable business, keeping 24.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COP's 13.3%. On growth, COP holds the edge at -0.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26.2B | $59.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18.6B | $23.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.3B | $7.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.5B | $16.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.8% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +13.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.1% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.1% | -38.4% |
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, WDS trades at a 19% valuation discount to COP's 17.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WDS's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COP's 6.7x.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38.9B | $139.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $46.9B | $156.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.42x | 17.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.82x | 23.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.99x | 6.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.00x | 2.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 2.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WDS delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $12 for COP. WDS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COP's 0.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COP scores 7/9 vs WDS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.8% | +12.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.5% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +10.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.0B | $16.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.7B | $6.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.7B | $23.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 109.20x | 11.99x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in COP five years ago would be worth $24,904 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,004 for WDS. Over the past 12 months, WDS leads with a +40.1% total return vs COP's +17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COP at 6.3% vs WDS's 0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.1% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.1% | +17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.5% | +20.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.0% | +149.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.3% | +306.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.8% | +6.3% |
Risk & Volatility
WDS is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COP's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.51 | $113.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.26 | $79.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +99.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.6 | 62.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 777K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WDS as "Hold" and COP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.7% upside for WDS (target: $28) vs 2.9% for COP (target: $117). For income investors, WDS offers the higher dividend yield at 5.13% vs COP's 2.94%.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.00 | $116.79 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.1% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.05 | $3.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.6% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 100 | 91.8 | -8.2% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | 100 | 206.76 | +106.8% |
ConocoPhillips (COP) returned +149% over 5 years vs Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS)'s +40%. A $10,000 investment in COP 5 years ago would be worth $24,904 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | $4.1B | $13.0B | +218.6% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | $23.9B | $59.7B | +149.8% |
Woodside Energy Group Ltd's revenue grew from $4.1B (2016) to $13.0B (2025) — a 13.7% CAGR. ConocoPhillips's revenue grew from $23.9B (2016) to $59.7B (2025) — a 10.7% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 21.3% | 20.9% | -1.7% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | -15.1% | 13.3% | +187.8% |
Woodside Energy Group Ltd's net margin went from 21% (2016) to 21% (2025). ConocoPhillips's net margin went from -15% (2016) to 13% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 20.9 | 11 | -47.4% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | 11.7 | 14.8 | +26.5% |
Woodside Energy Group Ltd has traded in a 6x–65x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~14x. ConocoPhillips has traded in a 8x–15x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~18x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 1.04 | 1.42 | +36.5% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | -2.9 | 6.34 | +318.6% |
Woodside Energy Group Ltd's EPS grew from $1.04 (2016) to $1.42 (2025) — a 4% CAGR. ConocoPhillips's EPS grew from $-2.90 (2016) to $6.34 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Woodside Energy Group Ltd generated $-782M FCF in 2025 (-167% vs 2021). ConocoPhillips generated $17B FCF in 2025 (+44% vs 2021).
WDS vs COP: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WDS or COP a better buy right now?
Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) offers the better valuation at 14.4x trailing P/E (29.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ConocoPhillips (COP) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WDS or COP?
On trailing P/E, Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is the cheapest at 14.4x versus ConocoPhillips at 17.9x. On forward P/E, ConocoPhillips is actually cheaper at 23.0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WDS or COP?
Over the past 5 years, ConocoPhillips (COP) delivered a total return of +149.0%, compared to +40.0% for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS). A $10,000 investment in COP five years ago would be worth approximately $25K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COP returned +306.3% versus WDS's +74.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WDS or COP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.82β versus ConocoPhillips's 0.99β — meaning COP is approximately 20% more volatile than WDS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 36% for ConocoPhillips — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — WDS or COP?
Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is the more profitable company, earning 20.9% net margin versus 13.3% for ConocoPhillips — meaning it keeps 20.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WDS leads at 29.8% versus 19.8% for COP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COP leads at 35.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is WDS or COP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ConocoPhillips (COP) trades at 23.0x forward P/E versus 29.8x for Woodside Energy Group Ltd — 6.8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WDS: 36.7% to $28.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — WDS or COP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) offers the highest yield at 5.1%, versus 2.9% for ConocoPhillips (COP).
08Is WDS or COP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ConocoPhillips (COP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.99), 2.9% yield, +306.3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (COP: +306.3%, WDS: +74.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between WDS and COP?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.