Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) vs ConocoPhillips (COP) vs Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) vs Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) vs APA Corporation (APA) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | COP | 9.3% revenue growth vs CTRA's -49.6% |
| Value | APA | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 43.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | CTRA | 62.4% net margin vs OXY's 9.2% |
| Stability / Safety | CTRA | Beta 0.63 vs APA's 1.55, lower leverage |
| Dividends | WDS | 5.1% yield, vs CTRA's 2.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | APA | +51.5% vs OXY's +10.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WDS | 9.5% ROA vs OXY's 2.7%, ROIC 6.3% vs 5.8% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Woodside Energy Group is an Australian oil and gas company that explores for, develops, and produces hydrocarbons — primarily liquefied natural gas (LNG) and crude oil — from assets across Australia, Asia, Africa, and the Americas. It generates revenue by selling LNG (its largest segment), pipeline gas, crude oil, condensate, and liquefied petroleum gas, with LNG exports to Asia being the dominant earnings driver. The company's competitive advantage lies in its ownership of large-scale, low-cost LNG production assets in Australia — particularly the North West Shelf and Pluto projects — which benefit from proximity to major Asian energy markets.
ConocoPhillips is a global independent exploration and production company that finds, produces, and sells crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. It generates revenue primarily from selling hydrocarbons produced from its diverse portfolio — including unconventional shale plays in North America, conventional assets worldwide, and oil sands in Canada — with no refining or marketing operations. The company's competitive advantage lies in its low-cost position, large-scale resource base, and operational expertise across multiple geographies and resource types.
Occidental Petroleum is an international oil and gas exploration and production company with operations spanning the United States, Middle East, Africa, and Latin America. It generates revenue primarily from its Oil and Gas segment — which contributes the majority of earnings — along with its Chemical manufacturing and Midstream marketing operations. The company's key advantage lies in its extensive, geographically diverse asset portfolio and its leadership in carbon capture technology through its Oxy Low Carbon Ventures division.
Coterra Energy is an independent oil and gas producer focused on developing natural gas and crude oil reserves across premier U.S. shale basins. It generates revenue primarily from selling natural gas (roughly 60% of production) and crude oil/liquids (roughly 40%), with its largest operations in the Marcellus Shale and Permian Basin. The company's competitive advantage lies in its low-cost, high-quality asset portfolio across multiple basins — particularly its core Marcellus position — which provides operational flexibility and resilience across commodity price cycles.
APA Corporation is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company with operations primarily in the United States, Egypt, and the United Kingdom. It generates revenue from oil and natural gas sales — with production roughly split between U.S. onshore assets (primarily the Permian Basin) and international operations — supplemented by midstream income from its West Texas gathering and pipeline assets. The company's competitive advantage lies in its diversified geographic portfolio, which provides operational resilience, and its established position in the prolific Permian Basin.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 5 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CTRA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics). APA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 4 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
COP is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.7B annually — 21.7x CTRA's $2.8B. CTRA is the more profitable business, keeping 62.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OXY's 9.2%.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | COPConocoPhillips | OXYOccidental Petrol… | CTRACoterra Energy In… | APAAPA Corporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26.2B | $59.7B | $25.0B | $2.8B | $8.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18.6B | $23.2B | $11.4B | $4.8B | $5.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.3B | $7.9B | $2.3B | $1.7B | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.5B | $16.8B | $4.1B | $2.2B | $2.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.8% | +35.2% | +29.2% | +60.4% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +19.8% | +14.9% | +89.1% | +30.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +13.3% | +9.2% | +62.4% | +16.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +28.1% | +16.4% | +81.0% | +26.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.1% | -0.3% | -26.2% | -2.9% | -26.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.1% | -38.4% | +77.8% | +20.0% | -17.7% |
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, APA trades at a 77% valuation discount to OXY's 33.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, APA's 2.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COP's 6.7x.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | COPConocoPhillips | OXYOccidental Petrol… | CTRACoterra Energy In… | APAAPA Corporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38.9B | $139.0B | $52.3B | $23.2B | $10.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $46.9B | $156.0B | $52.1B | $23.3B | $14.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.42x | 17.90x | 32.97x | 13.60x | 7.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.82x | 23.03x | 43.77x | 14.65x | 13.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.39x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.99x | 6.71x | 4.58x | 4.84x | 2.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.00x | 2.33x | 2.42x | 8.44x | 1.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 2.11x | 1.45x | 1.36x | 0.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.29x | 12.74x | 5.77x | 6.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WDS delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $6 for OXY. CTRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COP's 0.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COP scores 7/9 vs OXY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | COPConocoPhillips | OXYOccidental Petrol… | CTRACoterra Energy In… | APAAPA Corporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.8% | +12.3% | +6.3% | +10.0% | +11.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.5% | +6.5% | +2.7% | +7.7% | +8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +10.7% | +5.8% | +11.4% | +14.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +10.7% | +4.9% | +11.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 0.36x | 0.05x | 0.01x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.0B | $16.9B | $1.8B | $136M | $3.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.7B | $6.5B | $2.0B | $114M | $516M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.7B | $23.4B | $1.8B | $250M | $4.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 109.20x | 11.99x | 4.14x | 9.24x | 11.87x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in COP five years ago would be worth $24,904 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,004 for WDS. Over the past 12 months, APA leads with a +51.5% total return vs OXY's +10.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CTRA at 10.3% vs APA's -4.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | COPConocoPhillips | OXYOccidental Petrol… | CTRACoterra Energy In… | APAAPA Corporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.1% | +18.2% | +25.2% | +15.0% | +20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.1% | +17.7% | +10.6% | +16.6% | +51.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.5% | +20.0% | -5.0% | +34.1% | -13.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.0% | +149.0% | +103.3% | +96.1% | +76.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.3% | +306.3% | +0.8% | +90.4% | +0.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.8% | +6.3% | -1.7% | +10.3% | -4.6% |
Risk & Volatility
CTRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than APA's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APA currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs CTRA's 93.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | COPConocoPhillips | OXYOccidental Petrol… | CTRACoterra Energy In… | APAAPA Corporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 0.99x | 0.95x | 0.63x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.51 | $113.80 | $53.33 | $32.67 | $30.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.26 | $79.88 | $34.78 | $22.33 | $13.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +99.7% | +99.5% | +93.6% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.6 | 62.7 | 66.6 | 53.6 | 61.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 777K | 7.0M | 9.9M | 9.3M | 5.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WDS as "Hold", COP as "Buy", OXY as "Buy", CTRA as "Buy", APA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 36.7% upside for WDS (target: $28) vs -8.6% for APA (target: $28). For income investors, WDS offers the higher dividend yield at 5.13% vs CTRA's 2.93%.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | COPConocoPhillips | OXYOccidental Petrol… | CTRACoterra Energy In… | APAAPA Corporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.00 | $116.79 | $52.00 | $32.40 | $27.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 52 | 52 | 55 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.1% | +2.9% | +3.0% | +2.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.05 | $3.34 | $1.59 | $0.90 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.6% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 100 | 91.8 | -8.2% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | 100 | 206.76 | +106.8% |
| Occidental Petroleu… (OXY) | 100 | 132.93 | +32.9% |
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | 100 | 191.13 | +91.1% |
| APA Corporation (APA) | 100 | 101.45 | +1.4% |
ConocoPhillips (COP) returned +149% over 5 years vs Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS)'s +40%. A $10,000 investment in COP 5 years ago would be worth $24,904 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | $4.1B | $13.0B | +218.6% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | $23.9B | $59.7B | +149.8% |
| Occidental Petroleu… (OXY) | $10.1B | $21.6B | +113.9% |
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | $1.2B | $2.8B | +130.3% |
| APA Corporation (APA) | $5.4B | $8.9B | +66.2% |
Woodside Energy Group Ltd's revenue grew from $4.1B (2016) to $13.0B (2025) — a 13.7% CAGR. ConocoPhillips's revenue grew from $23.9B (2016) to $59.7B (2025) — a 10.7% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 21.3% | 20.9% | -1.7% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | -15.1% | 13.3% | +187.8% |
| Occidental Petroleu… (OXY) | -5.7% | 11.0% | +292.9% |
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | -34.9% | 62.4% | +278.8% |
| APA Corporation (APA) | -26.2% | 16.1% | +161.4% |
Woodside Energy Group Ltd's net margin went from 21% (2016) to 21% (2025). ConocoPhillips's net margin went from -15% (2016) to 13% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 20.9 | 11 | -47.4% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | 11.7 | 14.8 | +26.5% |
| Occidental Petroleu… (OXY) | 43.3 | 25.5 | -41.1% |
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | 130 | 11.7 | -91.0% |
| APA Corporation (APA) | 12.4 | 6.1 | -50.8% |
Woodside Energy Group Ltd has traded in a 6x–65x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~14x. ConocoPhillips has traded in a 8x–15x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~18x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 1.04 | 1.42 | +36.5% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | -2.9 | 6.34 | +318.6% |
| Occidental Petroleu… (OXY) | -0.75 | 1.61 | +314.7% |
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | -0.91 | 2.25 | +347.3% |
| APA Corporation (APA) | -3.71 | 3.99 | +207.5% |
Woodside Energy Group Ltd's EPS grew from $1.04 (2016) to $1.42 (2025) — a 4% CAGR. ConocoPhillips's EPS grew from $-2.90 (2016) to $6.34 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Woodside Energy Group Ltd generated $-782M FCF in 2025 (-167% vs 2021). ConocoPhillips generated $17B FCF in 2025 (+44% vs 2021).
WDS vs COP vs OXY vs CTRA vs APA: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WDS or COP or OXY or CTRA or APA a better buy right now?
APA Corporation (APA) offers the better valuation at 7.6x trailing P/E (13.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ConocoPhillips (COP) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WDS or COP or OXY or CTRA or APA?
On trailing P/E, APA Corporation (APA) is the cheapest at 7.6x versus Occidental Petroleum Corporation at 33.0x. On forward P/E, APA Corporation is actually cheaper at 13.4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WDS or COP or OXY or CTRA or APA?
Over the past 5 years, ConocoPhillips (COP) delivered a total return of +149.0%, compared to +40.0% for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS). A $10,000 investment in COP five years ago would be worth approximately $25K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COP returned +306.3% versus APA's +0.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WDS or COP or OXY or CTRA or APA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.63β versus APA Corporation's 1.55β — meaning APA is approximately 145% more volatile than CTRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 36% for ConocoPhillips — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — WDS or COP or OXY or CTRA or APA?
Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) is the more profitable company, earning 62.4% net margin versus 11.0% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation — meaning it keeps 62.4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTRA leads at 89.1% versus 17.2% for OXY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTRA leads at 60.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is WDS or COP or OXY or CTRA or APA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, APA Corporation (APA) trades at 13.4x forward P/E versus 43.8x for Occidental Petroleum Corporation — 30.4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WDS: 36.7% to $28.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — WDS or COP or OXY or CTRA or APA?
In this comparison, WDS (5.1% yield), OXY (3.0% yield), COP (2.9% yield), CTRA (2.9% yield) pay a dividend. APA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is WDS or COP or OXY or CTRA or APA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.63), 2.9% yield). APA Corporation (APA) carries a higher beta of 1.55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTRA: +90.4%, APA: +0.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between WDS and COP and OXY and CTRA and APA?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: WDS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; COP is a mid-cap deep-value stock; OXY is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CTRA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; APA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. WDS, COP, OXY, CTRA pay a dividend while APA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.