Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
WHWK vs NRXP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
WHWK vs NRXP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $206M | $66M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $2M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $-25M |
| Gross Margin | 89.3% | 37.1% |
| Operating Margin | -16.0% | -7.5% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $631K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $38M | $8M |
WHWK vs NRXP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whitehawk Therapeut… (WHWK) | 100 | 22.2 | -77.8% |
| NRx Pharmaceuticals… (NRXP) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WHWK vs NRXP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WHWK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.68
- Rev growth -72.5%, EPS growth 86.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -22.3%
- -95.4% 10Y total return vs NRXP's -96.0%
NRXP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- -7.6% revenue growth vs WHWK's -72.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -7.6% revenue growth vs WHWK's -72.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -288.3% margin vs NRXP's -10.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.68 vs NRXP's 2.05 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.9% vs NRXP's +11.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -11.2% ROA vs NRXP's -219.6% |
WHWK vs NRXP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WHWK vs NRXP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NRXP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WHWK is the larger business by revenue, generating $7M annually — 3.1x NRXP's $2M. WHWK is the more profitable business, keeping -2.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NRXP's -10.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $2M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$114M | -$31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | -$25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$98M | -$15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +89.3% | +37.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -16.0% | -7.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | -10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.7% | -6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.3% | +87.0% |
Valuation Metrics
WHWK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $206M | $66M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $168M | $59M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.61x | -2.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 28.79x | 54.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.89x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WHWK leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NRXP scores 6/9 vs WHWK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.0% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.2% | -2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -139.1% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -120.7% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$38M | -$7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $38M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $631,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -34.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WHWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WHWK five years ago would be worth $1,401 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $213 for NRXP. Over the past 12 months, WHWK leads with a +103.9% total return vs NRXP's +11.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRXP at -10.5% vs WHWK's -19.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +70.5% | +46.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +103.9% | +11.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.1% | -28.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.0% | -97.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.4% | -96.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.1% | -10.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WHWK and NRXP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WHWK is the less volatile stock with a 1.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRXP's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 2.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.50 | $5.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.57 | $1.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.7% | +76.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.5 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 331K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
WHWK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NRXP leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
WHWK vs NRXP: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — WHWK or NRXP?
Over the past 5 years, Whitehawk Therapeutics Inc (WHWK) delivered a total return of -86.
0%, compared to -97. 9% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WHWK returned -95. 4% versus NRXP's -96. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — WHWK or NRXP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Whitehawk Therapeutics Inc (WHWK) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
68β versus NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning NRXP is approximately 22% more volatile than WHWK relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — WHWK or NRXP?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Whitehawk Therapeutics Inc grew EPS 86.
0% year-over-year, compared to 43. 9% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — WHWK or NRXP?
Whitehawk Therapeutics Inc (WHWK) is the more profitable company, earning -288.
3% net margin versus -23. 4% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps -288. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NRXP leads at -1324. 4% versus -1601. 1% for WHWK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WHWK leads at 89. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — WHWK or NRXP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is WHWK or NRXP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Whitehawk Therapeutics Inc (WHWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WHWK: -95. 4%, NRXP: -96. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between WHWK and NRXP?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.