Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
WHWK logo
WHWK
NRXP logo
NRXP
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WHWK vs NRXP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WHWK
Whitehawk Therapeutics Inc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$206M
5Y Perf.-77.8%
NRXP
NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$66M
5Y Perf.-96.3%

WHWK vs NRXP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WHWK logoWHWK
NRXP logoNRXP
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$206M$66M
Revenue (TTM)$7M$2M
Net Income (TTM)$-21M$-25M
Gross Margin89.3%37.1%
Operating Margin-16.0%-7.5%
Total Debt$0.00$631K
Cash & Equiv.$38M$8M

WHWK vs NRXPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WHWK
NRXP
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Whitehawk Therapeut… (WHWK)10022.2-77.8%
NRx Pharmaceuticals… (NRXP)1003.7-96.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WHWK vs NRXP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WHWK leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇WHWK emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
WHWK
Whitehawk Therapeutics Inc
The Income Pick

WHWK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.68
  • Rev growth -72.5%, EPS growth 86.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -22.3%
  • -95.4% 10Y total return vs NRXP's -96.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
NRXP
NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Leader

NRXP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • -7.6% revenue growth vs WHWK's -72.5%
Best for: growth
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNRXP logoNRXP-7.6% revenue growth vs WHWK's -72.5%
Quality / MarginsWHWK logoWHWK-288.3% margin vs NRXP's -10.7%
Stability / SafetyWHWK logoWHWKBeta 1.68 vs NRXP's 2.05
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)WHWK logoWHWK+103.9% vs NRXP's +11.6%
Efficiency (ROA)WHWK logoWHWK-11.2% ROA vs NRXP's -219.6%

WHWK vs NRXP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WHWKWhitehawk Therapeutics Inc
FY 2025
Product
100.0%$7M
NRXPNRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Therapy
100.0%$854,000

WHWK vs NRXP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWHWKLAGGINGNRXP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NRXP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

WHWK is the larger business by revenue, generating $7M annually — 3.1x NRXP's $2M. WHWK is the more profitable business, keeping -2.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NRXP's -10.7%.

MetricWHWK logoWHWKWhitehawk Therape…NRXP logoNRXPNRx Pharmaceutica…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$7M$2M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$114M-$31M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$21M-$25M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$98M-$15M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+89.3%+37.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-16.0%-7.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.9%-10.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-13.7%-6.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+49.3%+87.0%
NRXP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

WHWK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
MetricWHWK logoWHWKWhitehawk Therape…NRXP logoNRXPNRx Pharmaceutica…
Market CapShares × price$206M$66M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$168M$59M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-12.61x-2.87x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue28.79x54.19x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.89x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
WHWK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WHWK leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NRXP scores 6/9 vs WHWK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricWHWK logoWHWKWhitehawk Therape…NRXP logoNRXPNRx Pharmaceutica…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-12.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-11.2%-2.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-139.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-120.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$38M-$7M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$38M$8M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$631,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-34.34x
WHWK leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WHWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WHWK five years ago would be worth $1,401 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $213 for NRXP. Over the past 12 months, WHWK leads with a +103.9% total return vs NRXP's +11.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRXP at -10.5% vs WHWK's -19.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWHWK logoWHWKWhitehawk Therape…NRXP logoNRXPNRx Pharmaceutica…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+70.5%+46.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+103.9%+11.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-47.1%-28.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.0%-97.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.4%-96.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-19.1%-10.5%
WHWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — WHWK and NRXP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

WHWK is the less volatile stock with a 1.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRXP's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricWHWK logoWHWKWhitehawk Therape…NRXP logoNRXPNRx Pharmaceutica…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.68x2.05x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.50$5.05
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.57$1.62
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+75.7%+76.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.555.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded331K1.3M
Evenly matched — WHWK and NRXP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
MetricWHWK logoWHWKWhitehawk Therape…NRXP logoNRXPNRx Pharmaceutica…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

WHWK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NRXP leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallWhitehawk Therapeutics Inc (WHWK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WHWK vs NRXP: Frequently Asked Questions

7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Which is the better long-term investment — WHWK or NRXP?

Over the past 5 years, Whitehawk Therapeutics Inc (WHWK) delivered a total return of -86.

0%, compared to -97. 9% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WHWK returned -95. 4% versus NRXP's -96. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

02

Which is safer — WHWK or NRXP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Whitehawk Therapeutics Inc (WHWK) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

68β versus NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning NRXP is approximately 22% more volatile than WHWK relative to the S&P 500.

03

Which is growing faster — WHWK or NRXP?

On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Whitehawk Therapeutics Inc grew EPS 86.

0% year-over-year, compared to 43. 9% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

04

Which has better profit margins — WHWK or NRXP?

Whitehawk Therapeutics Inc (WHWK) is the more profitable company, earning -288.

3% net margin versus -23. 4% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps -288. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NRXP leads at -1324. 4% versus -1601. 1% for WHWK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WHWK leads at 89. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

05

Which pays a better dividend — WHWK or NRXP?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

06

Is WHWK or NRXP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Whitehawk Therapeutics Inc (WHWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.

NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WHWK: -95. 4%, NRXP: -96. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

07

What are the main differences between WHWK and NRXP?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.