Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Meiwu Technology Company Limited (WNW) vs Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MUSA | -6.0% revenue growth vs WNW's -98.6% |
| Value | WNW | Lower P/E (0.2x vs 15.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | MUSA | 2.4% net margin vs WNW's -98.3% |
| Stability / Safety | MUSA | Beta 0.14 vs WNW's 1.25 |
| Dividends | MUSA | 0.5% yield; 4-year raise streak; WNW pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MUSA | -16.2% vs WNW's -56.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MUSA | 10.0% ROA vs WNW's -18.0%, ROIC 18.1% vs -26.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Meiwu Technology operates an online and mobile commerce platform focused on premium food products in China. It generates revenue primarily through its Clean Food Platform — selling green, organic, and specialty agricultural products — along with restaurant operations and wholesale distribution. The company's competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus on premium, culturally-significant food products that appeal to China's growing health-conscious consumer segment.
Murphy USA operates a chain of retail gasoline stations and convenience stores primarily located near Walmart stores across the southern and midwestern United States. It generates revenue from fuel sales — which account for roughly 90% of total revenue — and from merchandise sales inside its convenience stores. The company's key advantage is its strategic real estate footprint adjacent to Walmart's high-traffic locations, creating a built-in customer base and significant cost advantages in site acquisition and operations.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
MUSA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WNW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
MUSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.4B annually — 1740.7x WNW's $11M. MUSA is the more profitable business, keeping 2.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WNW's -98.3%. On growth, MUSA holds the edge at +0.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | WNWMeiwu Technology … | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $19.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $996M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $471M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$21M | $239M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +5.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -32.0% | +3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -98.3% | +2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -193.0% | +1.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -75.4% | +0.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +109.0% | +8.2% |
Valuation Metrics
At 0.2x trailing earnings, WNW trades at a 99% valuation discount to MUSA's 16.2x P/E.
| Metric | WNWMeiwu Technology … | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $98M | $7.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $55M | $9.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.17x | 16.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 615.69x | 0.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 9.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MUSA delivers a 75.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $75 in annual profit, vs $-19 for WNW. WNW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MUSA's 2.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MUSA scores 6/9 vs WNW's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | WNWMeiwu Technology … | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.6% | +75.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.0% | +10.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -26.0% | +18.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.6% | +21.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 2.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$42M | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $47M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.50x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in MUSA five years ago would be worth $31,698 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for WNW. Over the past 12 months, MUSA leads with a -16.2% total return vs WNW's -56.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MUSA at 15.8% vs WNW's -78.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | WNWMeiwu Technology … | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.8% | -3.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -56.1% | -16.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | +55.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +217.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +527.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -78.1% | +15.8% |
Risk & Volatility
MUSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WNW's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MUSA currently trades 74.7% from its 52-week high vs WNW's 42.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | WNWMeiwu Technology … | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.61 | $523.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.95 | $345.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.7% | +74.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.7 | 42.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 267K |
Analyst Outlook
MUSA is the only dividend payer here at 0.45% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | WNWMeiwu Technology … | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $451.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.77 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.1% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Dec 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meiwu Technology Co… (WNW) | 100 | 0.02 | -100.0% |
| Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) | 100 | 333.53 | +233.5% |
Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) returned +217% over 5 years vs Meiwu Technology Co… (WNW)'s -100%. A $10,000 investment in MUSA 5 years ago would be worth $31,698 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meiwu Technology Co… (WNW) | $43107.00 | $158485.00 | +267.7% |
| Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) | $12.7B | $20.2B | +59.4% |
Murphy USA Inc.'s revenue grew from $12.7B (2015) to $20.2B (2024) — a 5.3% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meiwu Technology Co… (WNW) | 77.8% | 32.3% | -58.5% |
| Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) | 1.4% | 2.5% | +78.8% |
Murphy USA Inc.'s net margin went from 1% (2015) to 2% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) | 11.9 | 20.8 | +74.8% |
Murphy USA Inc. has traded in a 10x–24x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~16x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meiwu Technology Co… (WNW) | 1.56 | 9.06 | +480.8% |
| Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) | 4.02 | 24.11 | +499.8% |
Murphy USA Inc.'s EPS grew from $4.02 (2015) to $24.11 (2024) — a 22% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Meiwu Technology Company Limited generated $-14M FCF in 2024 (-60% vs 2021). Murphy USA Inc. generated $390M FCF in 2024 (-16% vs 2021).
WNW vs MUSA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WNW or MUSA a better buy right now?
Meiwu Technology Company Limited (WNW) offers the better valuation at 0.2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WNW or MUSA?
On trailing P/E, Meiwu Technology Company Limited (WNW) is the cheapest at 0.2x versus Murphy USA Inc. at 16.2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WNW or MUSA?
Over the past 5 years, Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) delivered a total return of +217.0%, compared to -100.0% for Meiwu Technology Company Limited (WNW). A $10,000 investment in MUSA five years ago would be worth approximately $32K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MUSA returned +527.1% versus WNW's -100.0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WNW or MUSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.14β versus Meiwu Technology Company Limited's 1.25β — meaning WNW is approximately 829% more volatile than MUSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Meiwu Technology Company Limited (WNW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for Murphy USA Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — WNW or MUSA?
Meiwu Technology Company Limited (WNW) is the more profitable company, earning 32.3% net margin versus 2.5% for Murphy USA Inc. — meaning it keeps 32.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MUSA leads at 3.7% versus -1291.6% for WNW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WNW leads at 42.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — WNW or MUSA?
In this comparison, MUSA (0.5% yield) pays a dividend. WNW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is WNW or MUSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.14), +527.1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MUSA: +527.1%, WNW: -100.0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between WNW and MUSA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.