Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WYHG vs HAIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
WYHG vs HAIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $41M | $72M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $98.97B | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.29B | $-516M |
| Gross Margin | 29.0% | 19.3% |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | 2.2% |
| Forward P/E | 5.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $29M | $779M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85M | $54M |
WYHG vs HAIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wing Yip Food Holdi… (WYHG) | 100 | 20.7 | -79.3% |
| The Hain Celestial … (HAIN) | 100 | 9.6 | -90.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WYHG vs HAIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WYHG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.82
- Rev growth -8.8%, EPS growth -28.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.9%
- -80.8% 10Y total return vs HAIN's -98.4%
In this particular matchup, HAIN is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -8.8% revenue growth vs HAIN's -10.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.4% margin vs HAIN's -35.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs HAIN's 1.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -47.4% vs HAIN's -57.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 30.2% ROA vs HAIN's -35.4%, ROIC 109.1% vs 2.9% |
WYHG vs HAIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WYHG vs HAIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WYHG and HAIN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WYHG is the larger business by revenue, generating $99.0B annually — 68.1x HAIN's $1.5B. WYHG is the more profitable business, keeping 6.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAIN's -35.5%. On growth, HAIN holds the edge at -13.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $99.0B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14.5B | $74M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.3B | -$516M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | $42M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +19.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +2.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | -35.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.9% | -13.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -98.9% | +21.5% |
Valuation Metrics
HAIN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, WYHG's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HAIN's 8.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41M | $72M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $796M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.32x | -0.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.41x | 8.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 0.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 358.77x | 0.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WYHG leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WYHG delivers a 38.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $38 in annual profit, vs $-141 for HAIN. WYHG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAIN's 1.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAIN scores 3/9 vs WYHG's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +38.0% | -140.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +30.2% | -35.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +109.1% | +2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +89.1% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 1.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$57M | $725M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85M | $54M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29M | $779M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.25x | 0.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WYHG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WYHG five years ago would be worth $1,922 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $196 for HAIN. Over the past 12 months, WYHG leads with a -47.4% total return vs HAIN's -57.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WYHG at -42.3% vs HAIN's -60.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +45.0% | -24.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.4% | -57.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | -93.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | -98.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | -98.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.3% | -60.3% |
Risk & Volatility
WYHG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WYHG is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HAIN's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WYHG currently trades 42.7% from its 52-week high vs HAIN's 36.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 1.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.91 | $2.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.39 | $0.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.7% | +36.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.4 | 48.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 821K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.0% |
WYHG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). HAIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
WYHG vs HAIN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WYHG or HAIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) is the stronger pick with -8.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) a "Hold" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WYHG or HAIN?
Over the past 5 years, Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) delivered a total return of -80.
8%, compared to -98. 0% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WYHG returned -80. 8% versus HAIN's -98. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WYHG or HAIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
82β versus The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning HAIN is approximately 131% more volatile than WYHG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 164% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — WYHG or HAIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) is pulling ahead at -8.
8% versus -10. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares grew EPS -28. 4% year-over-year, compared to -601. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WYHG leads at 5. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — WYHG or HAIN?
Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
9% net margin versus -34. 0% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WYHG leads at 7. 8% versus 3. 6% for HAIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WYHG leads at 29. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — WYHG or HAIN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is WYHG or HAIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
82)). The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WYHG: -80. 8%, HAIN: -98. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between WYHG and HAIN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WYHG is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.