Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA) vs Apple Inc. (AAPL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  XOMA | 498.7% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4% |
| Value |  AAPL | Lower P/E (31.0x vs 39.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | XOMA | 41.1% net margin vs AAPL's 27.0% |
| Stability / Safety | XOMA | Beta 0.82 vs AAPL's 1.28, lower leverage |
| Dividends | XOMA | 1.8% yield, vs AAPL's 0.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | XOMA | +22.5% vs AAPL's +11.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AAPL | 31.1% ROA vs XOMA's 7.3%, ROIC 64.5% vs -37.6% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
XOMADividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 1.8%
Growth exposure
XOMARev growth 498.7%, EPS growth 59.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.3%
Long-term compounding (10Y)
AAPL9.6% 10Y total return vs XOMA's 46.9%
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
XOMALower volatility, beta 0.82, current ratio 5.15x
Defensive / Recession hedge
XOMABeta 0.82, yield 1.8%, current ratio 5.15x
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
XOMA Royalty Corp is a biotechnology royalty aggregator that acquires future economic rights to pre-commercial therapeutic candidates licensed to pharmaceutical partners. It generates revenue primarily through milestone payments and royalties from its portfolio of approximately 70 early to mid-stage clinical assets—typically earning a percentage of future drug sales if the therapies succeed. The company's moat lies in its specialized expertise in evaluating clinical-stage assets and structuring royalty agreements that provide diversified exposure to potential blockbuster drugs without bearing development costs.
Apple is a technology giant that designs and sells premium consumer electronics — most famously the iPhone — along with related software and services. It generates revenue primarily from hardware sales (roughly 80% of total) and a fast-growing services segment (around 20%) that includes the App Store, subscriptions, and licensing. Its key competitive advantage is a powerful ecosystem that locks users into its hardware, software, and services through seamless integration and high switching costs.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AAPL 2XOMA 1XOMA4/6 metricsAAPL5/8 metricsAAPL5/6 metricsAAPL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). XOMA leads in 1 (Financial Metrics). 3 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $435.6B annually — 9247.6x XOMA's $47M. XOMA is the more profitable business, keeping 41.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AAPL's 27.0%. On growth, XOMA holds the edge at +29.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | XOMAXOMA Royalty Corp. | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $47M | $435.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | $152.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $117.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5M | $123.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.8% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +32.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +41.1% | +27.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +28.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.9% | +15.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +144.0% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | XOMAXOMA Royalty Corp. | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $316M | $3.86T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $334M | $3.95T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.03x | 35.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 39.71x | 30.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.10x | 9.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.78x | 53.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 133.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $134 in annual profit, vs $18 for XOMA. XOMA carries lower financial leverage with a 1.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 7/9 vs XOMA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | XOMAXOMA Royalty Corp. | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.9% | +133.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | +31.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -37.6% | +64.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.4% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.46x | 1.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | $89.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $102M | $33.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $119M | $123.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $22,020 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,158 for XOMA. Over the past 12 months, XOMA leads with a +22.5% total return vs AAPL's +11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAPL at 20.0% vs XOMA's 7.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | XOMAXOMA Royalty Corp. | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.5% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.5% | +11.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.9% | +72.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.4% | +120.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.9% | +963.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.4% | +20.0% |
Risk & Volatility
XOMA is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAPL's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs XOMA's 66.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | XOMAXOMA Royalty Corp. | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.92 | $288.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.35 | $169.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.3% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.0 | 47.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 482K | 46.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates XOMA as "Buy" and AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 158.0% upside for XOMA (target: $68) vs 15.5% for AAPL (target: $303). For income investors, XOMA offers the higher dividend yield at 1.77% vs AAPL's 0.39%.
| Metric | XOMAXOMA Royalty Corp. | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.25 | $303.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 109 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.47 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +2.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Mar 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA) | 100 | 113.81 | +13.8% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 361.49 | +261.5% |
Apple Inc. (AAPL) returned +120% over 5 years vs XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA)'s -28%. A $10,000 investment in AAPL 5 years ago would be worth $22,020 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA) | $6M | $28M | +412.0% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | $215.6B | $416.2B | +93.0% |
Apple Inc.'s revenue grew from $215.6B (2016) to $416.2B (2025) — a 7.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA) | -9.6% | -48.5% | -404.3% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 21.2% | 26.9% | +27.0% |
Apple Inc.'s net margin went from 21% (2016) to 27% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA) | 48.8 | 32.1 | -34.2% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 18.4 | 36.4 | +97.8% |
XOMA Royalty Corp. has traded in a 32x–57x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~-16x. Apple Inc. has traded in a 13x–41x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~35x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA) | -8.89 | -1.65 | +81.4% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 2.08 | 7.46 | +258.7% |
Apple Inc.'s EPS grew from $2.08 (2016) to $7.46 (2025) — a 15% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
XOMA Royalty Corp. generated $-14M FCF in 2024 (-260% vs 2021). Apple Inc. generated $99B FCF in 2025 (+6% vs 2021).
XOMA vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XOMA or AAPL a better buy right now?
Apple Inc. (AAPL) offers the better valuation at 35.2x trailing P/E (31.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XOMA or AAPL?
On forward P/E, Apple Inc. is actually cheaper at 31.0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XOMA or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc. (AAPL) delivered a total return of +120.2%, compared to -28.4% for XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA). A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth approximately $22K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +963.0% versus XOMA's +46.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XOMA or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.82β versus Apple Inc.'s 1.28β — meaning AAPL is approximately 57% more volatile than XOMA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 146% versus 167% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — XOMA or AAPL?
Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26.9% net margin versus -48.5% for XOMA Royalty Corp. — meaning it keeps 26.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32.0% versus -140.3% for XOMA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XOMA leads at 99.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is XOMA or AAPL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Apple Inc. (AAPL) trades at 31.0x forward P/E versus 39.7x for XOMA Royalty Corp. — 8.8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOMA: 158.0% to $68.25.
07Which pays a better dividend — XOMA or AAPL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA) offers the highest yield at 1.8%, versus 0.4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL).
08Is XOMA or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.82), 1.8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOMA: +46.9%, AAPL: +963.0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between XOMA and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (XOMA (Healthcare) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced. XOMA pays a dividend while AAPL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.