Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) vs Apple Inc. (AAPL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | YPF | 265.7% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4% |
| Value | YPF | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 31.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | AAPL | 27.0% net margin vs YPF's -3.7% |
| Stability / Safety | YPF | Beta 1.20 vs AAPL's 1.28, lower leverage |
| Dividends | AAPL | 0.4% yield; 14-year raise streak; YPF pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AAPL | +9.7% vs YPF's +1.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AAPL | 31.1% ROA vs YPF's -1.4%, ROIC 64.5% vs 8.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
YPF is Argentina's largest integrated oil and gas company, operating across the entire energy value chain from exploration to retail fuel sales. It generates revenue primarily from upstream oil and gas production (roughly 60% of revenue) and downstream refining and marketing operations (roughly 40%), including its extensive network of service stations. The company's key advantage is its dominant position as Argentina's national champion in energy—controlling significant reserves, refineries, and distribution infrastructure that create substantial barriers to entry.
Apple is a technology giant that designs and sells premium consumer electronics — most famously the iPhone — along with related software and services. It generates revenue primarily from hardware sales (roughly 80% of total) and a fast-growing services segment (around 20%) that includes the App Store, subscriptions, and licensing. Its key competitive advantage is a powerful ecosystem that locks users into its hardware, software, and services through seamless integration and high switching costs.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AAPL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). YPF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
YPF is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.54T annually — 38.0x AAPL's $435.6B. AAPL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to YPF's -3.7%. On growth, YPF holds the edge at +33.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | YPFYPF Sociedad Anón… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.54T | $435.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.65T | $152.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$604.1B | $117.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$259.1B | $123.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +32.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +27.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | +28.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.9% | +15.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -120.3% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 8.0x trailing earnings, YPF trades at a 77% valuation discount to AAPL's 35.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, YPF's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AAPL's 27.5x.
| Metric | YPFYPF Sociedad Anón… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.9B | $3.88T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.1B | $3.97T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.99x | 35.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 31.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.51x | 27.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.99x | 9.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.60x | 53.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9999.00x | 39.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 133.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $134 in annual profit, vs $-4 for YPF. YPF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.82x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 7/9 vs YPF's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | YPFYPF Sociedad Anón… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.6% | +133.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.4% | +31.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +64.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.1% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 1.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.83T | $89.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.15T | $33.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9.98T | $123.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.94x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in YPF five years ago would be worth $85,072 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,049 for AAPL. Over the past 12 months, AAPL leads with a +9.7% total return vs YPF's +1.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors YPF at 44.3% vs AAPL's 21.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | YPFYPF Sociedad Anón… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.5% | -2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.0% | +9.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +200.7% | +81.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +750.7% | +110.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.5% | +1027.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.3% | +21.9% |
Risk & Volatility
YPF is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAPL's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs YPF's 87.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | YPFYPF Sociedad Anón… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.38 | $288.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.82 | $169.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.6% | +91.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.8 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 40.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates YPF as "Buy" and AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.8% upside for YPF (target: $47) vs 14.7% for AAPL (target: $303). AAPL is the only dividend payer here at 0.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | YPFYPF Sociedad Anón… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $47.00 | $303.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 109 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.3% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) | 100 | 483.33 | +383.3% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 361.46 | +261.5% |
YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) returned +751% over 5 years vs Apple Inc. (AAPL)'s +110%. A $10,000 investment in YPF 5 years ago would be worth $85,072 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) | $210.1B | $19.7T | +9275.4% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | $215.6B | $416.2B | +93.0% |
Apple Inc.'s revenue grew from $215.6B (2016) to $416.2B (2025) — a 7.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) | -13.4% | 12.3% | +191.4% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 21.2% | 26.9% | +27.0% |
Apple Inc.'s net margin went from 21% (2016) to 27% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) | 0.7 | 0 | -100.0% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 18.4 | 36.4 | +97.8% |
YPF Sociedad Anónima has traded in a 0x–1x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~8x. Apple Inc. has traded in a 13x–41x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~35x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) | -72.13 | 6,241.8 | +8753.5% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 2.08 | 7.46 | +258.7% |
Apple Inc.'s EPS grew from $2.08 (2016) to $7.46 (2025) — a 15% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
YPF Sociedad Anónima generated $477M FCF in 2024 (-100% vs 2021). Apple Inc. generated $99B FCF in 2025 (+6% vs 2021).
YPF vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YPF or AAPL a better buy right now?
YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) offers the better valuation at 8.0x trailing P/E (0.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YPF or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) is the cheapest at 8.0x versus Apple Inc. at 35.4x. On forward P/E, YPF Sociedad Anónima is actually cheaper at 0.0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YPF or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) delivered a total return of +750.7%, compared to +110.5% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). A $10,000 investment in YPF five years ago would be worth approximately $85K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1027% versus YPF's +98.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YPF or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) is the lower-risk stock at 1.20β versus Apple Inc.'s 1.28β — meaning AAPL is approximately 7% more volatile than YPF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 82% versus 167% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — YPF or AAPL?
Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26.9% net margin versus 12.3% for YPF Sociedad Anónima — meaning it keeps 26.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32.0% versus 7.7% for YPF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAPL leads at 46.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is YPF or AAPL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) trades at 0.0x forward P/E versus 31.1x for Apple Inc. — 31.1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for YPF: 32.8% to $47.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — YPF or AAPL?
In this comparison, AAPL (0.4% yield) pays a dividend. YPF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is YPF or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.28), +1027% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAPL: +1027%, YPF: +98.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between YPF and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (YPF (Energy) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced. In terms of investment character: YPF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.