Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ZBIO logo
ZBIO
KYMR logo
KYMR
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ZBIO vs KYMR vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ZBIO
Zenas BioPharma, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$793M
5Y Perf.+17.0%
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.77B
5Y Perf.+82.1%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.22B
5Y Perf.+15.0%

ZBIO vs KYMR vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ZBIO logoZBIO
KYMR logoKYMR
KO logoKO
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$793M$6.77B$355.22B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$51M$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$-425M$-315M$13.70B
Gross Margin100.0%33.2%61.7%
Operating Margin-21.1%-7.0%29.3%
Forward P/E25.2x
Total Debt$80M$82M$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$111M$357M$10.27B

ZBIO vs KYMR vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ZBIO
KYMR
KO
StockSep 24Jun 26Return
Zenas BioPharma, In… (ZBIO)100117.0+17.0%
Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR)100182.1+82.1%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100115.0+15.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ZBIO vs KYMR vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ZBIO
Zenas BioPharma, Inc.
The Growth Leader

ZBIO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 100.0% revenue growth vs KYMR's -16.7%
Best for: growth
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 0.90
  • 149.4% 10Y total return vs KO's 120.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Growth Play

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
  • 27.8% margin vs ZBIO's -37.8%
  • 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthZBIO logoZBIO100.0% revenue growth vs KYMR's -16.7%
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs ZBIO's -37.8%
Stability / SafetyKYMR logoKYMRBeta 0.90 vs ZBIO's 1.39, lower leverage
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)KYMR logoKYMR+71.4% vs KO's +17.4%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs ZBIO's -97.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs -154.5%

ZBIO vs KYMR vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ZBIOZenas BioPharma, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KYMRKymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

ZBIO vs KYMR vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGZBIO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO and ZBIO operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZBIO's -37.8%. On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricZBIO logoZBIOZenas BioPharma, …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$51M$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$423M-$352M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$425M-$315M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$210M-$244M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+100.0%+33.2%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-21.1%-7.0%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-37.8%-6.1%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-17.2%-4.7%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+55.5%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-82.5%+13.4%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ZBIO and KYMR and KO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricZBIO logoZBIOZenas BioPharma, …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$793M$6.8B$355.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$762M$6.5B$390.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.10x-22.48x27.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue79.29x172.78x7.41x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.28x4.43x10.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.07x
Evenly matched — ZBIO and KYMR and KO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-168 for ZBIO. KYMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs ZBIO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricZBIO logoZBIOZenas BioPharma, …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-167.7%-25.0%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-97.4%-22.3%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-154.5%-24.9%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-66.7%-27.2%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9347
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.33x0.05x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$31M-$275M$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$111M$357M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$80M$82M$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-62.50x-2119.53x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KYMR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KYMR five years ago would be worth $16,412 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,883 for ZBIO. Over the past 12 months, KYMR leads with a +71.4% total return vs KO's +17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 48.9% vs ZBIO's -0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricZBIO logoZBIOZenas BioPharma, …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-48.5%+14.0%+20.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+46.7%+71.4%+17.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-1.2%+230.0%+46.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-1.2%+64.1%+63.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-1.2%+149.4%+120.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-0.4%+48.9%+13.7%
KYMR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZBIO's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs ZBIO's 39.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricZBIO logoZBIOZenas BioPharma, …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.31x0.91x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$44.60$103.00$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.91$36.65$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+39.8%+80.5%+98.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.847.765.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded530K493K12.6M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ZBIO as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.1% upside for ZBIO (target: $35) vs 4.6% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricZBIO logoZBIOZenas BioPharma, …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$35.00$112.60$86.29
# AnalystsCovering analysts52648
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises56
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.2%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KYMR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ZBIO vs KYMR vs KO: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ZBIO or KYMR or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Zenas BioPharma, Inc.

(ZBIO) is the stronger pick with 100. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 1x trailing P/E (25. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zenas BioPharma, Inc. (ZBIO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — ZBIO or KYMR or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

(KYMR) delivered a total return of +64. 1%, compared to -1. 2% for Zenas BioPharma, Inc. (ZBIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KYMR returned +159. 2% versus ZBIO's +10. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — ZBIO or KYMR or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Zenas BioPharma, Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning ZBIO is approximately -756% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — ZBIO or KYMR or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zenas BioPharma, Inc.

(ZBIO) is pulling ahead at 100. 0% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -124. 5% for Zenas BioPharma, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — ZBIO or KYMR or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -37. 8% for Zenas BioPharma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -21. 1% for ZBIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZBIO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is ZBIO or KYMR or KO more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZBIO: 97.

1% to $35. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — ZBIO or KYMR or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield) pays a dividend. ZBIO, KYMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is ZBIO or KYMR or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, ZBIO: +10. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between ZBIO and KYMR and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (ZBIO (Healthcare) and KYMR (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ZBIO is a small-cap high-growth stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while ZBIO, KYMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.