Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
AEON logo
AEON
ABBV logo
ABBV
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AEON vs ABBV vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AEON
AEON Biopharma, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9M
5Y Perf.-99.9%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$402.80B
5Y Perf.+52.2%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+103.0%

AEON vs ABBV vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AEON logoAEON
ABBV logoABBV
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - GeneralBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$9M$402.80B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$61.16B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-60M$4.23B$57.05B
Gross Margin70.2%60.0%
Operating Margin26.7%25.9%
Forward P/E16.0x14.4x
Total Debt$36M$69.07B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$3M$5.23B$343.34B

AEON vs ABBV vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AEON
ABBV
JPM
StockJul 23Jun 26Return
AEON Biopharma, Inc. (AEON)1000.1-99.9%
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)100152.2+52.2%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100203.0+103.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AEON vs ABBV vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ABBV leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇ABBV emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
AEON
AEON Biopharma, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

AEON is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.11, current ratio 0.49x
  • Beta 0.11 vs JPM's 0.94
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
The Income Pick

ABBV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 43 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 2.9%
  • Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -0.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.8%
  • Beta 0.14, yield 2.9%, current ratio 0.67x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs ABBV's 362.2%
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 16.0x)
  • 20.4% margin vs ABBV's 6.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthABBV logoABBV8.6% revenue growth vs AEON's -135.5%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 16.0x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs ABBV's 6.9%
Stability / SafetyAEON logoAEONBeta 0.11 vs JPM's 0.94
DividendsABBV logoABBV2.9% yield, 43-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ABBV logoABBV+21.9% vs AEON's -18.1%
Efficiency (ROA)ABBV logoABBV3.1% ROA vs AEON's -7.0%

AEON vs ABBV vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
AEONAEON Biopharma, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ABBVAbbVie Inc.
FY 2025
SKYRIZI
30.2%$17.6B
RINVOQ
14.3%$8.3B
H U M I R A
7.8%$4.5B
Botox Therapeutic
6.5%$3.8B
Vraylar
6.2%$3.6B
Imbruvica
4.9%$2.9B
VENCLEXTA
4.8%$2.8B
Other (14)
25.3%$14.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

AEON vs ABBV vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLABBVLAGGINGAEON

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM and AEON operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABBV's 6.9%.

MetricAEON logoAEONAEON Biopharma, I…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$61.2B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$18M$24.5B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$60M$4.2B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$12M$18.7B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.2%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.7%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.9%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+30.6%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-142.5%+57.4%+16.0%
ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 83% valuation discount to ABBV's 96.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ABBV's 16.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 18.4x.

MetricAEON logoAEONAEON Biopharma, I…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$9M$402.8B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$41M$466.6B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.18x96.09x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.96x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.53x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.59x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.61x8.88x
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ABBV leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $16 for JPM. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs AEON's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAEON logoAEONAEON Biopharma, I…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+62.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-7.0%+3.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+23.9%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+21.5%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9265
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$33M$63.8B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$5.2B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$36M$69.1B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.28x0.74x
ABBV leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — ABBV and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $22,367 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11 for AEON. Over the past 12 months, ABBV leads with a +21.9% total return vs AEON's -18.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs AEON's -89.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAEON logoAEONAEON Biopharma, I…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-34.2%+0.8%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-18.1%+21.9%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+79.3%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+123.7%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+362.2%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-89.7%+21.5%+33.6%
Evenly matched — ABBV and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AEON and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AEON is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs AEON's 50.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAEON logoAEONAEON Biopharma, I…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.11x0.14x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.45$244.81$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.63$181.73$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+50.4%+93.0%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10033.762.859.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded85K4.6M7.0M
Evenly matched — AEON and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ABBV as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.8% upside for ABBV (target: $257) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, ABBV offers the higher dividend yield at 2.89% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricAEON logoAEONAEON Biopharma, I…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$256.92$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts4161
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.9%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises4315
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$6.57$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%+3.9%
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallAbbVie Inc. (ABBV)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AEON vs ABBV vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AEON or ABBV or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AEON or ABBV or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus AbbVie Inc. at 96. 1x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AEON or ABBV or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) delivered a total return of +123. 7%, compared to -99. 9% for AEON Biopharma, Inc. (AEON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus AEON's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AEON or ABBV or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AEON Biopharma, Inc.

(AEON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 11β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 794% more volatile than AEON relative to the S&P 500.

05

Which is growing faster — AEON or ABBV or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -105. 4% for AEON Biopharma, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AEON or ABBV or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for AEON Biopharma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus 0. 0% for AEON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ABBV leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AEON or ABBV or JPM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for AbbVie Inc. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABBV: 12. 8% to $256. 92.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AEON or ABBV or JPM?

In this comparison, ABBV (2.

9% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. AEON does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is AEON or ABBV or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 2. 9% yield, +362. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +362. 2%, AEON: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AEON and ABBV and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (AEON (Healthcare) and ABBV (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AEON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. ABBV, JPM pay a dividend while AEON does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.