Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ALNT logo
ALNT
CW logo
CW
KTOS logo
KTOS
KFRC logo
KFRC
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ALNT vs CW vs KTOS vs KFRC vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ALNT
Allient Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.55B
5Y Perf.+158.8%
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$27.98B
5Y Perf.+749.0%
KTOS
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.83B
5Y Perf.+269.5%
KFRC
Kforce Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$914M
5Y Perf.+70.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

ALNT vs CW vs KTOS vs KFRC vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ALNT logoALNT
CW logoCW
KTOS logoKTOS
KFRC logoKFRC
JPM logoJPM
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsAerospace & DefenseAerospace & DefenseStaffing & Employment ServicesBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$1.55B$27.98B$10.83B$914M$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$561M$3.61B$1.42B$1.33B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$24M$511M$29M$35M$57.05B
Gross Margin31.2%37.2%18.3%27.2%60.0%
Operating Margin8.4%18.5%1.8%3.8%25.9%
Forward P/E36.2x49.8x75.9x20.8x14.4x
Total Debt$197M$1.31B$180M$70M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$41M$371M$561M$2M$343.34B

ALNT vs CW vs KTOS vs KFRC vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ALNT
CW
KTOS
KFRC
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Allient Inc. (ALNT)100258.8+158.8%
Curtiss-Wright Corp… (CW)100849.0+749.0%
Kratos Defense & Se… (KTOS)100369.5+269.5%
Kforce Inc. (KFRC)100170.9+70.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ALNT vs CW vs KTOS vs KFRC vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KFRC and JPM are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. ALNT, CW, and KTOS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ALNT
Allient Inc.
The Momentum Pick

ALNT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +166.9% vs JPM's +21.8%
Best for: momentum
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

CW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 8.0% 10Y total return vs KTOS's 13.5%
  • 9.8% ROA vs KTOS's 1.0%, ROIC 14.1% vs 1.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
KTOS
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
The Growth Play

KTOS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 18.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
  • 18.5% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
Best for: growth exposure
KFRC
Kforce Inc.
The Income Pick

KFRC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 3.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
  • Beta 0.27, yield 3.1%, current ratio 1.78x
  • Beta 0.27 vs KTOS's 2.18
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • PEG 0.81 vs ALNT's 5.32
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 20.8x)
  • 20.4% margin vs KTOS's 2.1%
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKTOS logoKTOS18.5% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 20.8x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs KTOS's 2.1%
Stability / SafetyKFRC logoKFRCBeta 0.27 vs KTOS's 2.18
DividendsKFRC logoKFRC3.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ALNT logoALNT+166.9% vs JPM's +21.8%
Efficiency (ROA)CW logoCW9.8% ROA vs KTOS's 1.0%, ROIC 14.1% vs 1.4%

ALNT vs CW vs KTOS vs KFRC vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Defense Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Defense Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
ALNTAllient Inc.
FY 2025
Industrial
50.8%$268M
Vehicle
18.4%$97M
Medical
15.5%$82M
Aerospace & Defense
15.4%$81M
CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation
FY 2025
Naval Defense
26.9%$942M
Aerospace Defense
19.2%$673M
Power & Process
18.2%$635M
Commercial Aerospace
12.3%$430M
General Industrial
11.8%$412M
Ground Defense
11.6%$407M
KTOSKratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
65.2%$878M
Service
34.8%$469M
KFRCKforce Inc.
FY 2025
Flex Revenue
98.1%$1.3B
Direct Hire Revenue
1.9%$26M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

ALNT vs CW vs KTOS vs KFRC vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKFRCLAGGINGKTOS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 500.1x ALNT's $561M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KTOS's 2.1%. On growth, KTOS holds the edge at +22.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricALNT logoALNTAllient Inc.CW logoCWCurtiss-Wright Co…KTOS logoKTOSKratos Defense & …KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$561M$3.6B$1.4B$1.3B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$72M$729M$72M$56M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$24M$511M$29M$35M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$41M$591M-$134M$43M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+31.2%+37.2%+18.3%+27.2%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.4%+18.5%+1.8%+3.8%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.3%+14.2%+2.1%+2.6%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.3%+16.4%-9.5%+3.3%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.6%+13.4%+22.6%+0.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+52.4%+29.1%+133.3%+2.2%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 96% valuation discount to KTOS's 444.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs ALNT's 10.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricALNT logoALNTAllient Inc.CW logoCWCurtiss-Wright Co…KTOS logoKTOSKratos Defense & …KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$1.6B$28.0B$10.8B$914M$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.7B$28.9B$10.4B$981M$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS69.22x58.90x444.23x25.51x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.36.19x49.77x75.89x20.77x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate10.18x2.70x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple23.27x45.33x120.10x17.64x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.80x8.00x8.04x0.69x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.07x11.26x5.01x7.13x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF31.26x50.52x19.53x8.88x
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KFRC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $1 for KTOS. KTOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CW scores 7/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricALNT logoALNTAllient Inc.CW logoCWCurtiss-Wright Co…KTOS logoKTOSKratos Defense & …KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.0%+19.6%+1.3%+27.2%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.1%+9.8%+1.0%+9.2%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.7%+14.1%+1.4%+19.1%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.4%+16.6%+1.5%+20.1%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967445
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.65x0.52x0.09x0.56x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$156M$943M-$381M$68M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$41M$371M$561M$2M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$197M$1.3B$180M$70M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.31x15.90x6.16x0.74x
KFRC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CW five years ago would be worth $60,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,077 for KFRC. Over the past 12 months, ALNT leads with a +166.9% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CW at 62.5% vs KFRC's -3.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricALNT logoALNTAllient Inc.CW logoCWCurtiss-Wright Co…KTOS logoKTOSKratos Defense & …KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+64.5%+32.5%-27.2%+62.1%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+166.9%+60.1%+40.0%+25.9%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+136.9%+329.4%+302.4%-11.1%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+150.2%+500.9%+119.5%-9.2%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+314.8%+803.7%+1354.7%+226.5%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+33.3%+62.5%+59.1%-3.9%+33.6%
CW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KTOS's 2.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs KTOS's 43.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricALNT logoALNTAllient Inc.CW logoCWCurtiss-Wright Co…KTOS logoKTOSKratos Defense & …KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.10x1.38x2.18x0.27x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$95.65$768.65$134.00$50.70$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$33.02$458.74$39.00$24.49$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.5%+98.6%+43.1%+98.6%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.758.148.373.359.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded217K230K4.2M239K7.0M
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KFRC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ALNT as "Buy", CW as "Buy", KTOS as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 90.5% upside for KTOS (target: $110) vs -15.9% for ALNT (target: $77). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.09% vs CW's 0.12%.

MetricALNT logoALNTAllient Inc.CW logoCWCurtiss-Wright Co…KTOS logoKTOSKratos Defense & …KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$76.80$741.00$110.00$71.00$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts525241061
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%+0.1%+3.1%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises09815
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.12$0.92$1.55$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.7%0.0%+5.6%+3.9%
Evenly matched — KFRC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KFRC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallKforce Inc. (KFRC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ALNT vs CW vs KTOS vs KFRC vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ALNT or CW or KTOS or KFRC or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.

(KTOS) is the stronger pick with 18. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Allient Inc. (ALNT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ALNT or CW or KTOS or KFRC or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. at 444. 2x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Allient Inc. 's 5. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ALNT or CW or KTOS or KFRC or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) delivered a total return of +500.

9%, compared to -9. 2% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KTOS returned +1355% versus KFRC's +226. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ALNT or CW or KTOS or KFRC or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.

(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. 's 2. 18β — meaning KTOS is approximately 708% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ALNT or CW or KTOS or KFRC or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.

(KTOS) is pulling ahead at 18. 5% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Allient Inc. grew EPS 67. 1% year-over-year, compared to -25. 2% for Kforce Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KTOS leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ALNT or CW or KTOS or KFRC or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 1. 6% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 2. 1% for KTOS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ALNT or CW or KTOS or KFRC or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Allient Inc. 's 5. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 75. 9x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — 61. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KTOS: 90. 5% to $110. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ALNT or CW or KTOS or KFRC or JPM?

In this comparison, KFRC (3.

1% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), ALNT (0. 1% yield), CW (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. KTOS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ALNT or CW or KTOS or KFRC or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.

(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 3. 1% yield, +226. 5% 10Y return). Allient Inc. (ALNT) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +226. 5%, ALNT: +314. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ALNT and CW and KTOS and KFRC and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (ALNT (Technology) and CW (Industrials) and KTOS (Industrials) and KFRC (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ALNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. KFRC, JPM pay a dividend while ALNT, CW, KTOS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.