Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ALNT vs KFRC vs CW vs MFIN vs BFAM vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Aerospace & Defense
Financial - Credit Services
Personal Products & Services
Banks - Diversified
ALNT vs KFRC vs CW vs MFIN vs BFAM vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Staffing & Employment Services | Aerospace & Defense | Financial - Credit Services | Personal Products & Services | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $1.55B | $914M | $27.98B | $231M | $3.55B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $561M | $1.33B | $3.61B | $340M | $2.98B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $35M | $511M | $47M | $227M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 31.2% | 27.2% | 37.2% | 59.3% | 23.6% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 3.8% | 18.5% | 30.9% | 10.7% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 36.2x | 20.8x | 49.8x | 8.8x | 12.9x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $197M | $70M | $1.31B | $316M | $1.76B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $2M | $371M | $202M | $141M | $343.34B |
ALNT vs KFRC vs CW vs MFIN vs BFAM vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allient Inc. (ALNT) | 100 | 258.8 | +158.8% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 170.9 | +70.9% |
| Curtiss-Wright Corp… (CW) | 100 | 849.0 | +749.0% |
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 100 | 370.2 | +270.2% |
| Bright Horizons Fam… (BFAM) | 100 | 55.3 | -44.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALNT vs KFRC vs CW vs MFIN vs BFAM vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALNT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +166.9% vs BFAM's -48.3%
KFRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.27 vs ALNT's 2.10, lower leverage
CW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 8.0% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- 9.8% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 14.1% vs 4.5%
MFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive and bank quality.
- Beta 1.12, yield 4.6%, current ratio 27.10x
- NIM 7.3% vs JPM's 2.2%
- 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
- Lower P/E (8.8x vs 14.4x)
BFAM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 9.2%, EPS growth 40.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.2%
- PEG 0.26 vs ALNT's 5.32
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 20.4% margin vs KFRC's 2.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 14.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs KFRC's 2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs ALNT's 2.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +166.9% vs BFAM's -48.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.8% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 14.1% vs 4.5% |
ALNT vs KFRC vs CW vs MFIN vs BFAM vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ALNT vs KFRC vs CW vs MFIN vs BFAM vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MFIN leads in 1 of 6 categories
KFRC leads 1 • CW leads 1 • ALNT leads 0 • BFAM leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MFIN and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 825.0x MFIN's $340M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KFRC's 2.6%. On growth, CW holds the edge at +13.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $561M | $1.3B | $3.6B | $340M | $3.0B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $72M | $56M | $729M | $111M | $412M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | $35M | $511M | $47M | $227M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $41M | $43M | $591M | $126M | $273M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.2% | +27.2% | +37.2% | +59.3% | +23.6% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +3.8% | +18.5% | +30.9% | +10.7% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +2.6% | +14.2% | +13.7% | +7.6% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +3.3% | +16.4% | +37.2% | +9.2% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.6% | +0.1% | +13.4% | — | +7.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.4% | +2.2% | +29.1% | +16.3% | -6.1% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.5x trailing earnings, MFIN trades at a 92% valuation discount to ALNT's 69.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BFAM offers better value at 0.39x vs ALNT's 10.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $914M | $28.0B | $231M | $3.5B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $981M | $28.9B | $346M | $5.2B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 69.22x | 25.51x | 58.90x | 5.51x | 19.30x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 36.19x | 20.77x | 49.77x | 8.80x | 12.89x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 10.18x | — | 2.70x | — | 0.39x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.27x | 17.64x | 45.33x | 1.94x | 12.66x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.80x | 0.69x | 8.00x | 0.65x | 1.21x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.07x | 7.13x | 11.26x | 0.47x | 2.78x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.26x | 19.53x | 50.52x | 1.83x | 13.84x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $8 for ALNT. CW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BFAM scores 8/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.0% | +27.2% | +19.6% | +9.4% | +17.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +9.2% | +9.8% | +1.6% | +5.8% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +19.1% | +14.1% | +17.2% | +8.0% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.4% | +20.1% | +16.6% | +10.0% | +10.1% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.65x | 0.56x | 0.52x | 0.62x | 1.31x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $156M | $68M | $943M | $115M | $1.6B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $2M | $371M | $202M | $141M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $197M | $70M | $1.3B | $316M | $1.8B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.31x | — | 15.90x | 1.07x | 6.83x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CW five years ago would be worth $60,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,395 for BFAM. Over the past 12 months, ALNT leads with a +166.9% total return vs BFAM's -48.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CW at 62.5% vs BFAM's -11.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +64.5% | +62.1% | +32.5% | -1.1% | -34.7% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +166.9% | +25.9% | +60.1% | +8.6% | -48.3% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +136.9% | -11.1% | +329.4% | +44.5% | -29.8% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +150.2% | -9.2% | +500.9% | +25.5% | -56.1% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +314.8% | +226.5% | +803.7% | +65.9% | -0.2% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.3% | -3.9% | +62.5% | +13.1% | -11.1% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KFRC and BFAM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BFAM is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALNT's 2.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs BFAM's 49.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.10x | 0.27x | 1.38x | 1.12x | -0.02x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.65 | $50.70 | $768.65 | $11.00 | $130.76 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.02 | $24.49 | $458.74 | $7.88 | $57.64 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +98.6% | +98.6% | +89.2% | +49.6% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.7 | 73.3 | 58.1 | 57.4 | 47.1 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 217K | 239K | 230K | 62K | 1.1M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MFIN and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALNT as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", CW as "Buy", MFIN as "Hold", BFAM as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.4% upside for BFAM (target: $96) vs -15.9% for ALNT (target: $77). For income investors, MFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.61% vs CW's 0.12%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $76.80 | $71.00 | $741.00 | $10.50 | $95.57 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 10 | 25 | 9 | 20 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +3.1% | +0.1% | +4.6% | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 | 9 | 3 | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $1.55 | $0.92 | $0.45 | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.6% | +1.7% | +0.4% | +6.4% | +3.9% |
MFIN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). KFRC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ALNT vs KFRC vs CW vs MFIN vs BFAM vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALNT or KFRC or CW or MFIN or BFAM or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the stronger pick with 21. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 5. 5x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Allient Inc. (ALNT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALNT or KFRC or CW or MFIN or BFAM or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the cheapest at 5. 5x versus Allient Inc. at 69. 2x. On forward P/E, Medallion Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Allient Inc. 's 5. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALNT or KFRC or CW or MFIN or BFAM or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) delivered a total return of +500.
9%, compared to -56. 1% for Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. (BFAM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CW returned +803. 7% versus BFAM's -0. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALNT or KFRC or CW or MFIN or BFAM or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc.
(BFAM) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 02β versus Allient Inc. 's 2. 10β — meaning ALNT is approximately -11620% more volatile than BFAM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALNT or KFRC or CW or MFIN or BFAM or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is pulling ahead at 21. 1% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Allient Inc. grew EPS 67. 1% year-over-year, compared to -25. 2% for Kforce Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BFAM leads at 13. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALNT or KFRC or CW or MFIN or BFAM or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 2. 6% for Kforce Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFIN leads at 50. 5% versus 3. 8% for KFRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFIN leads at 96. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALNT or KFRC or CW or MFIN or BFAM or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. (BFAM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Allient Inc. 's 5. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 49. 8x for Curtiss-Wright Corporation — 41. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BFAM: 47. 4% to $95. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALNT or KFRC or CW or MFIN or BFAM or JPM?
In this comparison, MFIN (4.
6% yield), KFRC (3. 1% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), ALNT (0. 1% yield), CW (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. BFAM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ALNT or KFRC or CW or MFIN or BFAM or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 3. 1% yield, +226. 5% 10Y return). Allient Inc. (ALNT) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +226. 5%, ALNT: +314. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALNT and KFRC and CW and MFIN and BFAM and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (ALNT (Technology) and KFRC (Industrials) and CW (Industrials) and MFIN (Financial Services) and BFAM (Consumer Cyclical) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ALNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; BFAM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. KFRC, MFIN, JPM pay a dividend while ALNT, CW, BFAM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.