CCBG vs SBCF vs KO

For growth investors, Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (SBCF) is the stronger pick with 7.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Capital City Bank Group, Inc.

(CCBG) is the cheapest at 13. 1x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida is actually cheaper at 12. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Capital City Bank Group, Inc. wins at 0. 94x versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 6. 84x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Capital City Bank Group, Inc.

(CCBG) delivered a total return of +95. 7%, compared to +0. 1% for Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (SBCF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCBG returned +257. 8% versus SBCF's +115. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 1. 10β — meaning SBCF is approximately -648% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (SBCF) is pulling ahead at 7.

5% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to 11. 3% for Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 16. 7% for Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCBG leads at 30. 0% versus 21. 4% for SBCF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCBG leads at 87. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 94x versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 6. 84x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (SBCF) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCBG: 5. 1% to $49. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 2. 1% for Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG).

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, SBCF: +115. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (CCBG (Financial Services) and SBCF (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CCBG is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBCF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.