Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CCBG vs V vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Banks - Diversified
CCBG vs V vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Credit Services | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $808M | $618.49B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $279M | $43.03B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $62M | $22.24B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 87.1% | 81.3% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 30.0% | 61.1% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 24.5x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $93M | $25.17B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $20.15B | $343.34B |
CCBG vs V vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital City Bank G… (CCBG) | 100 | 224.9 | +124.9% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 166.9 | +66.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCBG vs V vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCBG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 16.9%, current ratio 1.24x
- Beta 0.56, yield 2.1%, current ratio 1.24x
- NIM 3.9% vs JPM's 2.2%
V carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 11.3%, EPS growth 4.8%
- 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs V's 330.2%
- PEG 0.81 vs V's 1.55
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 24.5x), PEG 0.94 vs 1.55 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CCBG's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.9% vs V's -12.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CCBG's 0.6% |
CCBG vs V vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CCBG vs V vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1003.7x CCBG's $279M. V is the more profitable business, keeping 51.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JPM's 20.4%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $279M | $43.0B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $89M | $27.6B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $62M | $22.2B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $98M | $21.2B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.1% | +81.3% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.0% | +61.1% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +51.7% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.1% | +49.2% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.8% | +35.3% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CCBG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, CCBG trades at a 59% valuation discount to V's 31.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs V's 2.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $808M | $618.5B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $839M | $623.5B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.09x | 31.61x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.04x | 24.51x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.94x | 2.00x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.39x | 24.73x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | 15.46x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 16.72x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.10x | 28.66x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
V leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $12 for CCBG. CCBG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCBG scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.5% | +58.9% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +22.7% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +29.2% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +36.2% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.66x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31M | $5.0B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $20.2B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $93M | $25.2B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.56x | 26.72x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,203 for V. Over the past 12 months, CCBG leads with a +27.9% total return vs V's -12.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs V's 13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | -6.6% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.9% | -12.5% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.7% | +45.6% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.7% | +42.0% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +257.8% | +330.2% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.9% | +13.3% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CCBG and V each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
V is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CCBG currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs V's 86.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | 0.54x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.78 | $374.17 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.94 | $293.89 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +86.2% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 46.9 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 77K | 6.4M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CCBG and V each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCBG as "Hold", V as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.4% upside for V (target: $369) vs 5.1% for CCBG (target: $50). For income investors, CCBG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.11% vs V's 0.73%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.50 | $368.91 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 61 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +0.7% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 18 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $2.36 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.2% | +3.9% |
V leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CCBG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CCBG vs V vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCBG or V or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger pick with 11. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Visa Inc. (V) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCBG or V or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
(CCBG) is the cheapest at 13. 1x versus Visa Inc. at 31. 6x. On forward P/E, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCBG or V or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +42. 0% for Visa Inc. (V). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus CCBG's +257. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCBG or V or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Visa Inc.
(V) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 75% more volatile than V relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCBG or V or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Visa Inc.
(V) is pulling ahead at 11. 3% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capital City Bank Group, Inc. grew EPS 15. 4% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCBG or V or JPM?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 20. 4% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 26. 0% for JPM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCBG leads at 87. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCBG or V or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 5x for Visa Inc. — 11. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for V: 14. 4% to $368. 91.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCBG or V or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 0. 7% for Visa Inc. (V).
09Is CCBG or V or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 0. 7% yield, +330. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (V: +330. 2%, JPM: +465. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCBG and V and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CCBG is a small-cap deep-value stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.