Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CCBG logo
CCBG
V logo
V
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CCBG vs V vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CCBG
Capital City Bank Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$808M
5Y Perf.+124.9%
V
Visa Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$618.49B
5Y Perf.+66.9%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%

CCBG vs V vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CCBG logoCCBG
V logoV
KO logoKO
IndustryBanks - RegionalFinancial - Credit ServicesBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$808M$618.49B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$279M$43.03B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$62M$22.24B$13.70B
Gross Margin87.1%81.3%61.7%
Operating Margin30.0%61.1%29.3%
Forward P/E13.0x24.5x25.3x
Total Debt$93M$25.17B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$62M$20.15B$10.27B

CCBG vs V vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CCBG
V
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Capital City Bank G… (CCBG)100224.9+124.9%
Visa Inc. (V)100166.9+66.9%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CCBG vs V vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: V leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Capital City Bank Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇V emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CCBG
Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CCBG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 257.8% 10Y total return vs V's 330.2%
  • PEG 0.94 vs KO's 2.26
  • Lower P/E (13.0x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.94 vs 2.26
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
V
Visa Inc.
The Banking Pick

V carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 11.3%, EPS growth 4.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 66.4%, current ratio 1.08x
  • 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
  • Beta -0.20, yield 2.5%, current ratio 1.46x
  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthV logoV11.3% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueCCBG logoCCBGLower P/E (13.0x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.94 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsV logoV51.7% margin vs CCBG's 22.0%
Stability / SafetyV logoVBeta 0.54 vs CCBG's 0.56
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%
Momentum (1Y)CCBG logoCCBG+27.9% vs V's -12.5%
Efficiency (ROA)V logoV22.7% ROA vs CCBG's 1.4%, ROIC 29.2% vs 10.3%

CCBG vs V vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
CCBGCapital City Bank Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Deposit fees
29.7%$22M
Wealth management fees
27.8%$21M
Mortgage Banking Revenues
22.8%$17M
Bank card fees
19.8%$15M
VVisa Inc.
FY 2025
Data Processing Revenues
50.0%$20.0B
Service
43.8%$17.5B
International Transaction Revenues
35.4%$14.2B
Service, Other
10.1%$4.1B
Client Incentives
-39.4%$-15,751,000,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

CCBG vs V vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCCBGLAGGINGKO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

V leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 176.5x CCBG's $279M. V is the more profitable business, keeping 51.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCBG's 22.0%.

MetricCCBG logoCCBGCapital City Bank…V logoVVisa Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$279M$43.0B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$89M$27.6B$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$62M$22.2B$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$98M$21.2B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+87.1%+81.3%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+30.0%+61.1%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+22.0%+51.7%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+35.1%+49.2%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.8%+35.3%+18.2%
V leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CCBG leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 13.1x trailing earnings, CCBG trades at a 59% valuation discount to V's 31.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CCBG offers better value at 0.94x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCCBG logoCCBGCapital City Bank…V logoVVisa Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$808M$618.5B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$839M$623.5B$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.09x31.61x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.04x24.51x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.94x2.00x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.39x24.73x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.89x15.46x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.46x16.72x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.10x28.66x67.15x
CCBG leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

V leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $12 for CCBG. CCBG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCBG scores 7/9 vs V's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCCBG logoCCBGCapital City Bank…V logoVVisa Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.5%+58.9%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.4%+22.7%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.3%+29.2%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.4%+36.2%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9757
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.17x0.66x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$31M$5.0B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$62M$20.2B$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$93M$25.2B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.56x26.72x10.70x
V leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CCBG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CCBG five years ago would be worth $19,565 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,203 for V. Over the past 12 months, CCBG leads with a +27.9% total return vs V's -12.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CCBG at 15.9% vs V's 13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCCBG logoCCBGCapital City Bank…V logoVVisa Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.6%-6.6%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+27.9%-12.5%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.7%+45.6%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+95.7%+42.0%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+257.8%+330.2%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.9%+13.3%+13.7%
CCBG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCBG's 0.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs V's 86.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCCBG logoCCBGCapital City Bank…V logoVVisa Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.56x0.54x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$48.78$374.17$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$35.94$293.89$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.6%+86.2%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.846.960.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded77K6.4M12.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CCBG as "Hold", V as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.4% upside for V (target: $369) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs V's 0.73%.

MetricCCBG logoCCBGCapital City Bank…V logoVVisa Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$49.50$368.91$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts76148
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.1%+0.7%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises111856
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.00$2.36$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.2%+0.2%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

V leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CCBG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).

Best OverallCapital City Bank Group, In… (CCBG)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CCBG vs V vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CCBG or V or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Visa Inc.

(V) is the stronger pick with 11. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Visa Inc. (V) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CCBG or V or KO?

On trailing P/E, Capital City Bank Group, Inc.

(CCBG) is the cheapest at 13. 1x versus Visa Inc. at 31. 6x. On forward P/E, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Capital City Bank Group, Inc. wins at 0. 94x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CCBG or V or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Capital City Bank Group, Inc.

(CCBG) delivered a total return of +95. 7%, compared to +42. 0% for Visa Inc. (V). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: V returned +330. 2% versus KO's +121. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CCBG or V or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Capital City Bank Group, Inc. 's 0. 56β — meaning CCBG is approximately -381% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CCBG or V or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Visa Inc.

(V) is pulling ahead at 11. 3% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to 4. 8% for Visa Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CCBG or V or KO?

Visa Inc.

(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 22. 0% for Capital City Bank Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 28. 7% for KO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCBG leads at 87. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CCBG or V or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 94x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for V: 14. 4% to $368. 91.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CCBG or V or KO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 0. 7% for Visa Inc. (V).

09

Is CCBG or V or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, CCBG: +257. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CCBG and V and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (CCBG (Financial Services) and V (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CCBG is a small-cap deep-value stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.