Marine Shipping
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CMBT vs STNG vs INSW vs DHT vs TEN vs JPM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
CMBT vs STNG vs INSW vs DHT vs TEN vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $3.56B | $4.09B | $4.06B | $2.83B | $1.17B | $896.00B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.67B | $1.04B | $985M | $566M | $801M | $280.33B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $161M | $502M | $546M | $331M | $142M | $57.05B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | 51.8% | 55.1% | 47.5% | 35.0% | 60.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 27.4% | 38.8% | 50.4% | 50.1% | 29.3% | 25.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 7.7x | 6.2x | 5.7x | 5.7x | 5.2x | 14.4x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $5.57B | $619M | $576M | $429M | $1.93B | $942.38B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $147M | $752M | $117M | $79M | $303M | $343.34B | $10.27B |
CMBT vs STNG vs INSW vs DHT vs TEN vs JPM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cmb.Tech N.V. (CMBT) | 100 | 190.2 | +90.2% |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 617.1 | +517.1% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 501.9 | +401.9% |
| DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) | 100 | 342.5 | +242.5% |
| Tsakos Energy Navig… (TEN) | 100 | 385.8 | +285.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMBT vs STNG vs INSW vs DHT vs TEN vs JPM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMBT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 77.2% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
STNG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
- PEG 0.19 vs KO's 2.26
- Beta 0.12, yield 2.1%, current ratio 9.33x
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.19 vs 2.26
- Beta 0.12 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
INSW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs DHT's 331.9%
- +138.1% vs KO's +17.2%
DHT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 58.6% margin vs CMBT's 9.6%
- 21.3% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 8.9% vs 4.5%
TEN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 5.2%
- 5.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
JPM doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 77.2% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.19 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 58.6% margin vs CMBT's 9.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +138.1% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.3% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 8.9% vs 4.5% |
CMBT vs STNG vs INSW vs DHT vs TEN vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CMBT vs STNG vs INSW vs DHT vs TEN vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INSW leads in 2 of 6 categories
TEN leads 1 • KO leads 1 • CMBT leads 0 • STNG leads 0 • DHT leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSW leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 495.2x DHT's $566M. DHT is the more profitable business, keeping 58.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMBT's 9.6%. On growth, CMBT holds the edge at +160.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $1.0B | $985M | $566M | $801M | $280.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $856M | $580M | $661M | $388M | $365M | $81.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $161M | $502M | $546M | $331M | $142M | $57.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$612M | $389M | $122M | -$131M | -$562M | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.5% | +51.8% | +55.1% | +47.5% | +35.0% | +60.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +38.8% | +50.4% | +50.1% | +29.3% | +25.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +48.4% | +55.4% | +58.6% | +17.7% | +20.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -36.7% | +37.5% | +12.3% | -23.1% | -70.2% | +36.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +160.6% | +46.2% | +77.5% | +57.3% | +18.0% | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.4% | +2.5% | +4.8% | +2.8% | +3.1% | +16.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TEN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.7x trailing earnings, TEN trades at a 68% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STNG offers better value at 0.34x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $4.1B | $4.1B | $2.8B | $1.2B | $896.0B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.0B | $4.0B | $4.5B | $3.2B | $2.8B | $1.50T | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.23x | 11.24x | 13.16x | 13.41x | 8.71x | 16.00x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.67x | 6.25x | 5.69x | 5.68x | 5.25x | 14.40x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.34x | — | — | — | 0.90x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.84x | 8.08x | 9.62x | 11.51x | 6.82x | 18.36x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.13x | 4.36x | 4.81x | 5.69x | 1.46x | 3.20x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 1.21x | 2.01x | 2.49x | 0.62x | 2.47x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.33x | 106.47x | — | — | 8.88x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DHT and KO each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $6 for CMBT. STNG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DHT scores 7/9 vs TEN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +15.9% | +27.1% | +29.1% | +7.8% | +15.9% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +12.6% | +20.1% | +21.3% | +3.7% | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +7.2% | +9.4% | +8.9% | +5.4% | +4.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +8.4% | +12.1% | +11.7% | +7.1% | +8.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.12x | 0.19x | 0.29x | 0.38x | 1.04x | 2.60x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.4B | -$133M | $459M | $350M | $1.6B | $599.0B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $147M | $752M | $117M | $79M | $303M | $343.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.6B | $619M | $576M | $429M | $1.9B | $942.4B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.09x | 6.82x | 1.41x | 25.61x | 2.45x | 0.74x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSW five years ago would be worth $53,474 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,560 for KO. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +138.1% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 41.0% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +74.4% | +60.9% | +88.8% | +58.6% | +79.4% | -0.5% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +73.1% | +93.0% | +138.1% | +63.4% | +117.6% | +21.8% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.2% | +90.5% | +180.6% | +152.4% | +154.9% | +138.2% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +169.1% | +293.4% | +434.7% | +237.0% | +385.6% | +118.2% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +191.6% | +80.8% | +978.0% | +331.9% | +62.7% | +465.8% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.0% | +24.0% | +41.0% | +36.2% | +36.6% | +33.6% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs TEN's 84.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 0.12x | 0.31x | 0.24x | 0.26x | 0.94x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.72 | $87.39 | $92.66 | $20.55 | $45.85 | $337.25 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.78 | $38.83 | $36.03 | $10.61 | $18.10 | $262.71 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.5% | +90.5% | +88.5% | +85.5% | +84.6% | +95.1% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.7 | 43.5 | 53.6 | 42.4 | 35.7 | 59.1 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 901K | 497K | 2.9M | 304K | 7.0M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TEN and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CMBT as "Hold", STNG as "Buy", INSW as "Buy", DHT as "Buy", TEN as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.0% upside for TEN (target: $50) vs 2.4% for DHT (target: $18). For income investors, TEN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.22% vs CMBT's 0.59%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $87.00 | $86.67 | $18.00 | $50.00 | $339.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 31 | 13 | 16 | 26 | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +2.1% | +3.6% | +4.2% | +5.2% | +1.9% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $1.69 | $2.92 | $0.74 | $2.02 | $5.95 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% | +0.2% |
INSW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CMBT vs STNG vs INSW vs DHT vs TEN vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMBT or STNG or INSW or DHT or TEN or JPM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cmb.
Tech N. V. (CMBT) is the stronger pick with 77. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (5. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMBT or STNG or INSW or DHT or TEN or JPM or KO?
On trailing P/E, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the cheapest at 8.
7x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited is actually cheaper at 5. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Scorpio Tankers Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMBT or STNG or INSW or DHT or TEN or JPM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) delivered a total return of +434. 7%, compared to +65. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +978. 0% versus TEN's +62. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMBT or STNG or INSW or DHT or TEN or JPM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMBT or STNG or INSW or DHT or TEN or JPM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cmb.
Tech N. V. (CMBT) is pulling ahead at 77. 2% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -83. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMBT leads at 24. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMBT or STNG or INSW or DHT or TEN or JPM or KO?
DHT Holdings, Inc.
(DHT) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 5% net margin versus 9. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. — meaning it keeps 42. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 22. 2% for CMBT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMBT or STNG or INSW or DHT or TEN or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) trades at 5. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 20. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEN: 29. 0% to $50. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMBT or STNG or INSW or DHT or TEN or JPM or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the highest yield at 5. 2%, versus 0. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. (CMBT).
09Is CMBT or STNG or INSW or DHT or TEN or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31), 3. 6% yield, +978. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +978. 0%, JPM: +465. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMBT and STNG and INSW and DHT and TEN and JPM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (CMBT (Industrials) and STNG (Energy) and INSW (Energy) and DHT (Energy) and TEN (Energy) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CMBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock; DHT is a small-cap deep-value stock; TEN is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.