Chemicals - Specialty
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CMT vs TREX vs JPM vs BAC vs CPRI vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
Luxury Goods
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
CMT vs TREX vs JPM vs BAC vs CPRI vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Construction | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Luxury Goods | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $227M | $4.74B | $896.00B | $422.78B | $2.46B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $271M | $1.18B | $280.33B | $191.57B | $3.47B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10M | $191M | $57.05B | $30.51B | $137M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 17.6% | 39.2% | 60.0% | 56.1% | 59.7% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.4% | 22.1% | 25.9% | 19.7% | 1.8% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 23.0x | 27.2x | 14.4x | 12.6x | 15.2x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $33M | $229M | $942.38B | $365.90B | $1.42B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $38M | $4M | $343.34B | $231.84B | $135M | $10.27B |
CMT vs TREX vs JPM vs BAC vs CPRI vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Molding Techno… (CMT) | 100 | 598.1 | +498.1% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 70.2 | -29.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 100 | 235.9 | +135.9% |
| Capri Holdings Limi… (CPRI) | 100 | 136.5 | +36.5% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMT vs TREX vs JPM vs BAC vs CPRI vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.49, Low D/E 20.8%, current ratio 3.02x
- Beta 0.49, current ratio 3.02x
- Beta 0.49 vs CPRI's 1.93, lower leverage
- +47.7% vs TREX's -20.1%
TREX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs BAC's 368.2%
- PEG 0.81 vs TREX's 8.14
- NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
- 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs CPRI's -21.8%
BAC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 2.3%
CPRI doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 27.8% margin vs CMT's 3.5%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- 13.1% ROA vs BAC's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs CPRI's -21.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs CMT's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs CPRI's 1.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.7% vs TREX's -20.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs BAC's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.5% |
CMT vs TREX vs JPM vs BAC vs CPRI vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CMT vs TREX vs JPM vs BAC vs CPRI vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
CMT leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • TREX leads 0 • BAC leads 0 • CPRI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1034.7x CMT's $271M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMT's 3.5%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $271M | $1.2B | $280.3B | $191.6B | $3.5B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21M | $327M | $81.4B | $40.0B | $185M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $10M | $191M | $57.0B | $30.5B | $137M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $239M | $100.9B | $12.6B | -$109M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +39.2% | +60.0% | +56.1% | +59.7% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +22.1% | +25.9% | +19.7% | +1.8% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +16.3% | +20.4% | +15.9% | +3.9% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +20.3% | +36.0% | +6.6% | -3.1% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.7% | +1.0% | — | — | -23.1% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -72.2% | +3.6% | +16.0% | +18.3% | +99.4% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CMT and JPM and BAC each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 47% valuation discount to CPRI's 27.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs TREX's 7.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $227M | $4.7B | $896.0B | $422.8B | $2.5B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $222M | $5.0B | $1.50T | $556.8B | $3.7B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.10x | 25.63x | 16.00x | 14.66x | 27.70x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.03x | 27.22x | 14.40x | 12.56x | 15.18x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.38x | 7.66x | 0.90x | 0.95x | — | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.34x | 15.47x | 18.36x | 13.92x | 18.43x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.83x | 4.04x | 3.20x | 2.21x | 0.71x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 4.72x | 2.47x | 1.39x | 30.43x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 118.29x | 35.24x | 8.88x | 33.52x | 175.49x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CMT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CPRI delivers a 99.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $99 in annual profit, vs $6 for CMT. CMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPRI's 16.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAC scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +18.8% | +15.9% | +10.1% | +99.5% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +12.3% | +1.3% | +0.9% | +3.2% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +16.4% | +4.5% | +3.5% | +2.6% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | +23.2% | +8.9% | +4.5% | +2.7% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.22x | 2.60x | 1.21x | 16.90x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $225M | $599.0B | $134.1B | $1.3B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $38M | $4M | $343.3B | $231.8B | $135M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $33M | $229M | $942.4B | $365.9B | $1.4B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 144.87x | — | 0.74x | 0.48x | — | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,918 for CPRI. Over the past 12 months, CMT leads with a +47.7% total return vs TREX's -20.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs CPRI's -16.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.6% | +27.4% | -0.5% | +1.1% | -12.5% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.7% | -20.1% | +21.8% | +28.1% | +19.6% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.5% | -21.9% | +138.2% | +103.0% | -41.6% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.5% | -54.4% | +118.2% | +47.1% | -60.8% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.8% | +340.6% | +465.8% | +368.2% | -57.1% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.7% | -7.9% | +33.6% | +26.6% | -16.4% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CPRI's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs TREX's 66.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 1.51x | 0.94x | 0.86x | 1.93x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.69 | $68.78 | $337.25 | $57.55 | $28.27 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.12 | $29.77 | $262.71 | $43.66 | $16.22 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.9% | +66.3% | +95.1% | +97.3% | +75.5% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.7 | 66.5 | 59.1 | 68.3 | 65.3 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 1.7M | 7.0M | 31.7M | 2.7M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CMT as "Buy", TREX as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy", CPRI as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.8% upside for CPRI (target: $24) vs -2.6% for CMT (target: $24). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $48.33 | $339.75 | $61.13 | $23.63 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 31 | 61 | 54 | 54 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% | +2.3% | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 15 | 12 | 0 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 | $1.27 | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +1.1% | +3.9% | +5.1% | +3.3% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). CMT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
CMT vs TREX vs JPM vs BAC vs CPRI vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMT or TREX or JPM or BAC or CPRI or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 8% for Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMT or TREX or JPM or BAC or CPRI or KO?
On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.
7x versus Capri Holdings Limited at 27. 7x. On forward P/E, Bank of America Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 8. 14x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMT or TREX or JPM or BAC or CPRI or KO?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -60. 8% for Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus CPRI's -57. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMT or TREX or JPM or BAC or CPRI or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Capri Holdings Limited's 1. 93β — meaning CPRI is approximately -1062% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 17% for Capri Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMT or TREX or JPM or BAC or CPRI or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -21. 8% for Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capri Holdings Limited grew EPS 107. 7% year-over-year, compared to -14. 8% for Trex Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMT or TREX or JPM or BAC or CPRI or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 2. 6% for Capri Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 2. 4% for CPRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMT or TREX or JPM or BAC or CPRI or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 8. 14x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 27. 2x for Trex Company, Inc. — 14. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPRI: 10. 8% to $23. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMT or TREX or JPM or BAC or CPRI or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), BAC (2. 3% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. CMT, TREX, CPRI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CMT or TREX or JPM or BAC or CPRI or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, CPRI: -57. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMT and TREX and JPM and BAC and CPRI and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (CMT (Basic Materials) and TREX (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services) and BAC (Financial Services) and CPRI (Consumer Cyclical) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CMT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock; CPRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. JPM, BAC, KO pay a dividend while CMT, TREX, CPRI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.