Auto - Parts
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CREVW vs CREV vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
CREVW vs CREV vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | — | $775K | $341.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $58M | $58M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-46M | $-46M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | -40.2% | -40.2% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -63.3% | -63.3% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.3x |
| Total Debt | $111M | $111M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $4M | $10.27B |
CREVW vs CREV vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 23 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon Revolution P… (CREVW) | 100 | 6.3 | -93.8% |
| Carbon Revolution P… (CREV) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 125.1 | +25.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CREVW vs CREV vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CREVW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 86.8%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- 86.8% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
CREV plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 115.0% 10Y total return vs CREV's -98.6%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.23, current ratio 1.46x
- Beta -0.23, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.46x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 86.8% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs CREV's -79.6% | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.7% vs CREV's -81.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs CREV's -27.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs -27.1% |
CREVW vs CREV vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CREVW vs CREV vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 855.2x CREV's $58M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CREV's -79.6%. On growth, CREVW holds the edge at +107.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $58M | $58M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$25M | -$25M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$46M | -$46M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$62M | -$62M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -40.2% | -40.2% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -63.3% | -63.3% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -79.6% | -79.6% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -107.6% | -107.6% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +107.9% | +107.9% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -156.9% | -156.9% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CREV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $775,174 | $341.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $78M | $376.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | — | 26.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 24.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 25.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.02x | 7.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 9.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 64.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-21 for CREV. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs CREV's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.2% | -21.2% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.5% | -27.5% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.1% | -27.1% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | -3.1% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $107M | $107M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $4M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $111M | $111M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.47x | -7.47x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,528 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $137 for CREV. Over the past 12 months, KO leads with a +17.7% total return vs CREV's -81.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 11.7% vs CREV's -76.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.4% | -76.8% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -79.7% | -81.7% | +17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -98.6% | +39.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -98.6% | +65.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -98.6% | +115.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -76.1% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CREV's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs CREV's 4.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.20x | 2.02x | -0.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.05 | $9.20 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $0.01 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.8% | +4.4% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.2 | 44.2 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 61K | 469K | 13.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | 0.0% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CREV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
CREVW vs CREV vs KO: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CREVW or CREV or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is the stronger pick with 86.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 26. 1x trailing P/E (24. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CREVW or CREV or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
3%, compared to -98. 6% for Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (CREV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +115. 0% versus CREV's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CREVW or CREV or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
23β versus Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares's 2. 02β — meaning CREV is approximately -966% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CREVW or CREV or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is pulling ahead at 86.
8% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to 23. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CREVW leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CREVW or CREV or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -309. 4% for Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -235. 9% for CREV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CREVW or CREV or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
6% yield) pays a dividend. CREVW, CREV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CREVW or CREV or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
23), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (CREV) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, CREV: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CREVW and CREV and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (CREVW (Consumer Cyclical) and CREV (Consumer Cyclical) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CREVW is a small-cap high-growth stock; CREV is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while CREVW, CREV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.