Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
EQ logo
EQ
ARQT logo
ARQT
ABBV logo
ABBV
AMGN logo
AMGN
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EQ vs ARQT vs ABBV vs AMGN vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EQ
Equillium, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$271M
5Y Perf.-4.7%
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.05B
5Y Perf.-19.4%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$402.80B
5Y Perf.+132.0%
AMGN
Amgen Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$191.70B
5Y Perf.+50.6%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%

EQ vs ARQT vs ABBV vs AMGN vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EQ logoEQ
ARQT logoARQT
ABBV logoABBV
AMGN logoAMGN
KO logoKO
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - GeneralDrug Manufacturers - GeneralBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$271M$3.05B$402.80B$191.70B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$416M$61.16B$37.24B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$-19M$-2M$4.23B$7.80B$13.70B
Gross Margin90.9%70.2%71.5%61.7%
Operating Margin0.8%26.7%31.6%29.3%
Forward P/E122.5x16.0x15.9x25.3x
Total Debt$719K$6M$69.07B$54.60B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$30M$43M$5.23B$9.13B$10.27B

EQ vs ARQT vs ABBV vs AMGN vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EQ
ARQT
ABBV
AMGN
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Equillium, Inc. (EQ)10095.3-4.7%
Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT)10080.6-19.4%
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)100232.0+132.0%
Amgen Inc. (AMGN)100150.6+50.6%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EQ vs ARQT vs ABBV vs AMGN vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ABBV and KO are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. EQ, ARQT, and AMGN also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EQ
Equillium, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

EQ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 10.32x
  • +6.3% vs KO's +17.2%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARQT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
  • 91.3% revenue growth vs EQ's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
The Income Pick

ABBV has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 43 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 2.9%
  • 362.2% 10Y total return vs AMGN's 178.4%
  • Beta 0.14, yield 2.9%, current ratio 0.67x
  • Beta 0.14 vs ARQT's 1.45
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
AMGN
Amgen Inc.
The Value Play

AMGN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (15.9x vs 122.5x)
Best for: value
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Value Pick

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • PEG 2.26 vs AMGN's 5.39
  • 27.8% margin vs ARQT's -0.6%
  • 13.1% ROA vs EQ's -53.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs -88.8%
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARQT logoARQT91.3% revenue growth vs EQ's -100.0%
ValueAMGN logoAMGNLower P/E (15.9x vs 122.5x)
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs ARQT's -0.6%
Stability / SafetyABBV logoABBVBeta 0.14 vs ARQT's 1.45
DividendsABBV logoABBV2.9% yield, 43-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)EQ logoEQ+6.3% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs EQ's -53.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs -88.8%

EQ vs ARQT vs ABBV vs AMGN vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
EQEquillium, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARQTArcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Other Revenue
51.0%$30M
Product
49.0%$29M
ABBVAbbVie Inc.
FY 2025
SKYRIZI
30.2%$17.6B
RINVOQ
14.3%$8.3B
H U M I R A
7.8%$4.5B
Botox Therapeutic
6.5%$3.8B
Vraylar
6.2%$3.6B
Imbruvica
4.9%$2.9B
VENCLEXTA
4.8%$2.8B
Other (14)
25.3%$14.7B
AMGNAmgen Inc.
FY 2025
Other Products
20.6%$7.3B
Prolia
12.5%$4.4B
Repatha
8.5%$3.0B
Otezla
6.4%$2.3B
ENBREL
6.3%$2.2B
EVENITY
5.9%$2.1B
XGEVA
5.9%$2.1B
Other (8)
33.9%$12.0B
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

EQ vs ARQT vs ABBV vs AMGN vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLEQLAGGINGABBV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ARQT and ABBV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

ABBV and EQ operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARQT's -0.6%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.AMGN logoAMGNAmgen Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$416M$61.2B$37.2B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$20M$6M$24.5B$15.6B$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$19M-$2M$4.2B$7.8B$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$19M$27M$18.7B$8.6B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+90.9%+70.2%+71.5%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.8%+26.7%+31.6%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.6%+6.9%+20.9%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.5%+30.6%+23.1%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+60.1%+10.0%+5.8%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+77.0%+55.0%+57.4%+4.4%+18.2%
Evenly matched — ARQT and ABBV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AMGN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 25.0x trailing earnings, AMGN trades at a 74% valuation discount to ABBV's 96.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KO offers better value at 2.43x vs AMGN's 8.49x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.AMGN logoAMGNAmgen Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$271M$3.0B$402.8B$191.7B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$241M$3.0B$466.6B$237.2B$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-7.21x-187.54x96.09x24.96x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.122.45x15.96x15.87x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate8.49x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.53x14.97x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.11x6.59x5.22x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share9.03x16.37x22.24x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.61x23.67x67.15x
AMGN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — ABBV and KO each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-61 for EQ. EQ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMGN's 6.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMGN scores 7/9 vs EQ's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.AMGN logoAMGNAmgen Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-61.4%-1.4%+62.1%+89.4%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-53.7%-0.6%+3.1%+8.6%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-88.8%-5.2%+23.9%+14.8%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-98.1%-4.3%+21.5%+16.0%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–914677
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.03x6.31x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$30M-$37M$63.8B$45.5B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$30M$43M$5.2B$9.1B$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$719,000$6M$69.1B$54.6B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.08x3.28x5.02x10.70x
Evenly matched — ABBV and KO each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

EQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $22,367 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,691 for EQ. Over the past 12 months, EQ leads with a +627.0% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQ at 58.2% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.AMGN logoAMGNAmgen Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+83.7%-15.9%+0.8%+10.0%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+627.0%+80.6%+21.9%+22.8%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+295.8%+138.8%+79.3%+76.2%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-53.1%-16.2%+123.7%+65.2%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.9%+11.8%+362.2%+178.4%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+58.2%+33.7%+21.5%+20.8%+13.7%
EQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARQT's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs ARQT's 76.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.AMGN logoAMGNAmgen Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.58x1.45x0.14x0.53x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.43$31.77$244.81$391.29$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.27$12.72$181.73$267.83$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+81.9%+76.7%+93.0%+90.8%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.766.462.861.260.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded565K1.5M4.6M2.4M12.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ABBV and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: EQ as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", AMGN as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 122.4% upside for EQ (target: $6) vs -1.8% for AMGN (target: $349). For income investors, ABBV offers the higher dividend yield at 2.89% vs KO's 2.46%.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.AMGN logoAMGNAmgen Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$6.25$34.00$256.92$348.80$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts1212413848
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.9%+2.7%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises431556
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$6.57$9.45$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.2%0.0%+0.2%
Evenly matched — ABBV and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AMGN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). EQ leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallEquillium, Inc. (EQ)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EQ vs ARQT vs ABBV vs AMGN vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EQ or ARQT or ABBV or AMGN or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). Amgen Inc. (AMGN) offers the better valuation at 25. 0x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Equillium, Inc. (EQ) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — EQ or ARQT or ABBV or AMGN or KO?

On trailing P/E, Amgen Inc.

(AMGN) is the cheapest at 25. 0x versus AbbVie Inc. at 96. 1x. On forward P/E, Amgen Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Coca-Cola Company wins at 2. 26x versus Amgen Inc. 's 5. 39x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — EQ or ARQT or ABBV or AMGN or KO?

Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) delivered a total return of +123. 7%, compared to -53. 1% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +362. 2% versus EQ's -79. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — EQ or ARQT or ABBV or AMGN or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning ARQT is approximately -823% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Equillium, Inc. (EQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 6% for Amgen Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — EQ or ARQT or ABBV or AMGN or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -100. 0% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -69. 6% for Equillium, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — EQ or ARQT or ABBV or AMGN or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -4. 3% for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -3. 3% for ARQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARQT leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is EQ or ARQT or ABBV or AMGN or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 26x versus Amgen Inc. 's 5. 39x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Amgen Inc. (AMGN) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 122. 5x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 106. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EQ: 122. 4% to $6. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — EQ or ARQT or ABBV or AMGN or KO?

In this comparison, ABBV (2.

9% yield), AMGN (2. 7% yield), KO (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. EQ, ARQT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is EQ or ARQT or ABBV or AMGN or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, ARQT: +11. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between EQ and ARQT and ABBV and AMGN and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (EQ (Healthcare) and ARQT (Healthcare) and ABBV (Healthcare) and AMGN (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ABBV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; AMGN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. ABBV, AMGN, KO pay a dividend while EQ, ARQT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.