Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
EQ logo
EQ
CABA logo
CABA
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EQ vs CABA vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EQ
Equillium, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$271M
5Y Perf.-4.7%
CABA
Cabaletta Bio, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$491M
5Y Perf.-73.0%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$875.80B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

EQ vs CABA vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EQ logoEQ
CABA logoCABA
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$271M$491M$875.80B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-19M$-175M$57.05B
Gross Margin60.0%
Operating Margin25.9%
Forward P/E14.1x
Total Debt$719K$27M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$30M$83M$343.34B

EQ vs CABA vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EQ
CABA
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Equillium, Inc. (EQ)10095.3-4.7%
Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA)10027.0-73.0%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EQ vs CABA vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Equillium, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
EQ
Equillium, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

EQ is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 10.32x
  • Beta 0.50, current ratio 10.32x
  • Beta 0.50 vs CABA's 2.18, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
CABA
Cabaletta Bio, Inc.
The Secondary Option

CABA plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.9%
  • Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
  • 454.4% 10Y total return vs CABA's -69.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJPM logoJPM3.3% NII/revenue growth vs EQ's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs CABA's 2.4%
Stability / SafetyEQ logoEQBeta 0.50 vs CABA's 2.18, lower leverage
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)EQ logoEQ+6.3% vs JPM's +19.1%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs CABA's -96.5%, ROIC 4.5% vs -429.6%

EQ vs CABA vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EQEquillium, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CABACabaletta Bio, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

EQ vs CABA vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLEQLAGGINGCABA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

EQ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

JPM and CABA operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.CABA logoCABACabaletta Bio, In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$20M-$178M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$19M-$175M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$19M-$143M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+77.0%+46.6%+16.0%
EQ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — EQ and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.CABA logoCABACabaletta Bio, In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$271M$491M$875.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$241M$435M$1.47T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-7.21x-1.84x15.64x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.08x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.20x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.13x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share9.03x2.75x2.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.68x
Evenly matched — EQ and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-132 for CABA. EQ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs CABA's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.CABA logoCABACabaletta Bio, In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-61.4%-131.6%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-53.7%-96.5%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-88.8%-4.3%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-98.1%-126.2%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9115
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.24x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$30M-$56M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$30M$83M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$719,000$27M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-73.78x0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

EQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,999 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,516 for CABA. Over the past 12 months, EQ leads with a +628.0% total return vs JPM's +19.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQ at 58.2% vs CABA's -37.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.CABA logoCABACabaletta Bio, In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+83.7%+36.2%-2.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+628.0%+72.0%+19.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+295.8%-75.6%+133.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-54.2%-64.8%+110.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.9%-69.9%+454.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+58.2%-37.5%+32.6%
EQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — EQ and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

EQ is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CABA's 2.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs CABA's 71.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.CABA logoCABACabaletta Bio, In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.58x2.02x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.43$4.23$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.27$1.26$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+81.9%+71.2%+93.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.536.654.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded559K3.6M7.0M
Evenly matched — EQ and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: EQ as "Buy", CABA as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 442.5% upside for CABA (target: $16) vs 8.1% for JPM (target: $339). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.CABA logoCABACabaletta Bio, In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$6.25$16.33$338.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts121261
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

EQ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). JPM leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallEquillium, Inc. (EQ)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EQ vs CABA vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EQ or CABA or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Equillium, Inc. (EQ) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — EQ or CABA or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +110. 0%, compared to -64. 8% for Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus EQ's -79. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — EQ or CABA or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Equillium, Inc.

(EQ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 58β versus Cabaletta Bio, Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning CABA is approximately 246% more volatile than EQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Equillium, Inc. (EQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — EQ or CABA or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -100. 0% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cabaletta Bio, Inc. grew EPS 29. 9% year-over-year, compared to -69. 6% for Equillium, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — EQ or CABA or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for Cabaletta Bio, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 0. 0% for CABA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is EQ or CABA or JPM more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CABA: 442.

5% to $16. 33.

07

Which pays a better dividend — EQ or CABA or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. EQ, CABA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is EQ or CABA or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, CABA: -69. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between EQ and CABA and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (EQ (Healthcare) and CABA (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CABA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while EQ, CABA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.