Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FHI logo
FHI
GROW logo
GROW
KO logo
KO
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FHI vs GROW vs KO vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FHI
Federated Hermes, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.49B
5Y Perf.+149.2%
GROW
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$39M
5Y Perf.+63.2%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$341.71B
5Y Perf.+77.7%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$908.57B
5Y Perf.+245.8%

FHI vs GROW vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FHI logoFHI
GROW logoGROW
KO logoKO
JPM logoJPM
IndustryAsset ManagementAsset ManagementBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$4.49B$39M$341.71B$908.57B
Revenue (TTM)$1.86B$11M$49.28B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$399M$3M$13.70B$57.05B
Gross Margin51.5%64.9%61.7%60.0%
Operating Margin27.4%-1.4%29.3%25.9%
Forward P/E11.6x24.3x14.6x
Total Debt$457M$83K$45.49B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$584M$25M$10.27B$343.34B

FHI vs GROW vs KO vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FHI
GROW
KO
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Federated Hermes, I… (FHI)100249.2+149.2%
U.S. Global Investo… (GROW)100163.2+63.2%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100177.7+77.7%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100345.8+245.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FHI vs GROW vs KO vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FHI leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. U.S. Global Investors, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. JPM also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FHI emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
FHI
Federated Hermes, Inc.
The Banking Pick

FHI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 11.0%, EPS growth 58.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 36.2%, current ratio 41.26x
  • Beta 0.70, yield 2.4%, current ratio 41.26x
  • 11.0% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
GROW
U.S. Global Investors, Inc.
The Banking Pick

GROW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 2.9%
  • 29.1% margin vs JPM's 20.4%
  • 2.9% yield, vs KO's 2.6%
Best for: income & stability
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Angle

KO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 481.2% 10Y total return vs FHI's 144.4%
  • PEG 0.83 vs KO's 2.17
  • NIM 2.2% vs FHI's 0.5%
  • Lower P/E (14.6x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.83 vs 2.17
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFHI logoFHI11.0% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.6x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.83 vs 2.17
Quality / MarginsGROW logoGROW29.1% margin vs JPM's 20.4%
Stability / SafetyFHI logoFHIBeta 0.70 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage
DividendsGROW logoGROW2.9% yield, vs KO's 2.6%
Momentum (1Y)FHI logoFHI+43.1% vs KO's +17.7%
Efficiency (ROA)FHI logoFHI18.2% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 24.1% vs 4.5%

FHI vs GROW vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FHIFederated Hermes, Inc.
FY 2025
Federated Hermes Funds
84.0%$1.5B
Separate accounts
14.2%$256M
Other
1.8%$33M
GROWU.S. Global Investors, Inc.
FY 2025
Investment And Advisory Services
101.5%$8M
Administrative Service
1.5%$127,000
Investment Performance
-3.0%$-247,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

FHI vs GROW vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFHILAGGINGKO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GROW leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 25880.1x GROW's $11M. GROW is the more profitable business, keeping 29.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JPM's 20.4%.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…GROW logoGROWU.S. Global Inves…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.9B$11M$49.3B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$527M-$111,000$15.5B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$399M$3M$13.7B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$307M$464,000$12.6B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+51.5%+64.9%+61.7%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.4%-1.4%+29.3%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+21.4%+29.1%+27.8%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.5%+4.3%+25.5%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.6%+8.8%+18.2%+16.0%
GROW leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FHI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 11.5x trailing earnings, FHI trades at a 56% valuation discount to KO's 26.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…GROW logoGROWU.S. Global Inves…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$4.5B$39M$341.7B$908.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.4B$15M$376.9B$1.51T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS11.51x-124.00x26.12x16.22x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.56x24.27x14.60x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.19x2.34x0.92x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.82x25.45x18.52x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.48x4.65x7.13x3.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.51x0.92x9.99x2.51x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.23x64.52x9.01x
FHI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FHI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $7 for GROW. GROW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FHI scores 8/9 vs GROW's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…GROW logoGROWU.S. Global Inves…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+29.5%+7.0%+41.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+18.2%+6.5%+13.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+24.1%-4.7%+15.8%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+26.3%-6.2%+17.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–98275
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.36x0.00x1.33x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$127M-$24M$35.2B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$584M$25M$10.3B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$457M$83,000$45.5B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense44.07x776.00x10.70x0.74x
FHI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,846 for GROW. Over the past 12 months, FHI leads with a +43.1% total return vs KO's +17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs GROW's 7.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…GROW logoGROWU.S. Global Inves…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+14.2%+27.8%+16.4%+0.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+43.1%+31.8%+17.7%+20.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+69.2%+22.5%+39.3%+138.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+101.8%-41.5%+65.3%+135.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+144.4%+96.0%+115.0%+481.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+19.2%+7.0%+11.7%+33.7%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FHI and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FHI currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs GROW's 84.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…GROW logoGROWU.S. Global Inves…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.70x0.73x-0.24x0.87x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$59.83$3.65$84.04$338.09
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$41.71$2.23$65.35$269.72
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.7%+84.9%+94.5%+96.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.268.749.272.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded734K28K13.6M7.4M
Evenly matched — FHI and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — GROW and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FHI as "Hold", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.5% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -2.7% for FHI (target: $58). For income investors, GROW offers the higher dividend yield at 2.92% vs JPM's 1.83%.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…GROW logoGROWU.S. Global Inves…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$57.50$86.13$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts214861
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.4%+2.9%+2.6%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises305615
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.40$0.09$2.04$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+5.9%+5.0%+0.2%+3.8%
Evenly matched — GROW and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FHI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GROW leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallFederated Hermes, Inc. (FHI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FHI vs GROW vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FHI or GROW or KO or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Federated Hermes, Inc.

(FHI) is the stronger pick with 11. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FHI or GROW or KO or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Federated Hermes, Inc.

(FHI) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Federated Hermes, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 83x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FHI or GROW or KO or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -41. 5% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus GROW's +96. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FHI or GROW or KO or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

24β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 87β — meaning JPM is approximately -468% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FHI or GROW or KO or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Federated Hermes, Inc.

(FHI) is pulling ahead at 11. 0% versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Federated Hermes, Inc. grew EPS 58. 8% year-over-year, compared to -126. 6% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FHI or GROW or KO or JPM?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -4. 0% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FHI leads at 29. 5% versus -35. 3% for GROW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FHI leads at 73. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FHI or GROW or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 8. 5% to $86. 13.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FHI or GROW or KO or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 1. 8% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).

09

Is FHI or GROW or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

24), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, GROW: +96. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FHI and GROW and KO and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (FHI (Financial Services) and GROW (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FHI is a small-cap deep-value stock; GROW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.