Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FUSE vs AIOT vs JPM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
FUSE vs AIOT vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Communication Equipment | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $37M | $523M | $842.21B | $342.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $436M | $270.79B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $262K | $-32M | $58.03B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 54.8% | 55.2% | 58.6% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -89.5% | 1.7% | 27.7% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 14.0x | 24.3x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $287M | $751.15B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $49M | $469.32B | $10.27B |
FUSE vs AIOT vs JPM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE) | 100 | 11.4 | -88.6% |
| PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) | 100 | 84.0 | -16.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 154.4 | +54.4% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 124.9 | +24.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FUSE vs AIOT vs JPM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FUSE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AIOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.
- Rev growth 66.3%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
- Beta 2.69, yield 19.6%, current ratio 1.12x
- 66.3% revenue growth vs FUSE's -98.6%
- 19.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.6%
- 435.6% 10Y total return vs KO's 112.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, current ratio 0.65x
- PEG 1.08 vs KO's 2.18
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 27.8% margin vs AIOT's -7.4%
- 13.1% ROA vs AIOT's -3.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs -4.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.3% revenue growth vs FUSE's -98.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 24.3x), PEG 1.08 vs 2.18 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs AIOT's -7.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs AIOT's 2.69 | |
| Dividends | 19.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.5% vs FUSE's -89.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs AIOT's -3.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs -4.3% |
FUSE vs AIOT vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FUSE vs AIOT vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
JPM leads 2 • FUSE leads 0 • AIOT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $270.8B annually — 28227.8x FUSE's $10M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIOT's -7.4%. On growth, AIOT holds the edge at +47.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $436M | $270.8B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $69M | $81.3B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $261,897 | -$32M | $58.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $3M | -$119.7B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.8% | +55.2% | +58.6% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -89.5% | +1.7% | +27.7% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | -7.4% | +21.6% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -82.3% | +0.6% | -15.5% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +47.4% | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -25.5% | +16.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 40% valuation discount to KO's 26.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 1.22x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $37M | $523M | $842.2B | $342.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34M | $761M | $1.12T | $377.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.90x | -8.93x | 15.82x | 26.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 14.03x | 24.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.22x | 2.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 47.93x | 13.54x | 25.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.80x | 1.44x | 3.11x | 7.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.03x | 2.61x | 10.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 64.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-7 for AIOT. AIOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.64x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs FUSE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -6.6% | +16.1% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | -3.4% | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -4.3% | +5.4% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | -5.1% | +8.2% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.64x | 2.18x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $238M | $281.8B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $49M | $469.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $287M | $751.1B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.49x | 0.47x | 0.74x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,314 for FUSE. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.5% total return vs FUSE's -89.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.0% vs FUSE's -50.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.7% | -26.9% | -3.1% | +15.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.1% | -16.7% | +21.5% | +15.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | -19.5% | +135.5% | +40.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | -19.5% | +102.5% | +58.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | -19.5% | +435.6% | +112.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.4% | -7.0% | +33.0% | +12.0% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIOT's 2.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs FUSE's 5.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 2.69x | 0.95x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.00 | $5.88 | $337.25 | $82.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.80 | $2.77 | $260.31 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.1% | +65.3% | +92.6% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.0 | 73.9 | 58.4 | 37.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 1.5M | 7.1M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AIOT and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AIOT as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 108.3% upside for AIOT (target: $8) vs 8.5% for JPM (target: $339). For income investors, AIOT offers the higher dividend yield at 19.62% vs JPM's 1.64%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.00 | $338.78 | $86.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +19.6% | +1.6% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.75 | $5.13 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | +3.4% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
FUSE vs AIOT vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FUSE or AIOT or JPM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 6% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FUSE or AIOT or JPM or KO?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 1. 08x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 18x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FUSE or AIOT or JPM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +102. 5%, compared to -86. 9% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +435. 6% versus FUSE's -86. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FUSE or AIOT or JPM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus PowerFleet, Inc. 's 2. 69β — meaning AIOT is approximately -1917% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 64% versus 2% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FUSE or AIOT or JPM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus -98. 6% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fusemachines Inc. grew EPS 86. 1% year-over-year, compared to 21. 7% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIOT leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FUSE or AIOT or JPM or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -14. 1% for PowerFleet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -77. 2% for FUSE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FUSE or AIOT or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 08x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 18x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 10. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AIOT: 108. 3% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FUSE or AIOT or JPM or KO?
In this comparison, AIOT (19.
6% yield), KO (2. 6% yield), JPM (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. FUSE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FUSE or AIOT or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 6% yield, +112. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +112. 9%, FUSE: -86. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FUSE and AIOT and JPM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (FUSE (Technology) and AIOT (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FUSE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIOT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. AIOT, JPM, KO pay a dividend while FUSE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.