Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
GLUE vs KYMR vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
GLUE vs KYMR vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $6.77B | $355.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $43M | $51M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-130M | $-315M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 95.3% | 33.2% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -345.2% | -7.0% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 25.2x |
| Total Debt | $39M | $82M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $130M | $357M | $10.27B |
GLUE vs KYMR vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monte Rosa Therapeu… (GLUE) | 100 | 80.3 | -19.7% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 152.7 | +52.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLUE vs KYMR vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLUE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 63.5%, EPS growth 53.1%
- 63.5% revenue growth vs KYMR's -16.7%
- +238.6% vs KO's +17.4%
KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.90
- 149.4% 10Y total return vs KO's 120.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 27.8% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
- 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
- 13.1% ROA vs GLUE's -25.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs -44.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 63.5% revenue growth vs KYMR's -16.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs GLUE's 1.30, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +238.6% vs KO's +17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs GLUE's -25.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs -44.2% |
GLUE vs KYMR vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GLUE vs KYMR vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 1147.4x GLUE's $43M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $43M | $51M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$140M | -$352M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$130M | -$315M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | -$244M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.3% | +33.2% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | -7.0% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | -6.1% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -45.8% | -4.7% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -95.0% | +55.5% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | +13.4% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GLUE and KYMR and KO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $6.8B | $355.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $6.5B | $390.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -37.17x | -22.48x | 27.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 25.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 26.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.00x | 172.78x | 7.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.10x | 4.43x | 10.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 67.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-41 for GLUE. KYMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs KYMR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -41.0% | -25.0% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.9% | -22.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -44.2% | -24.9% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.3% | -27.2% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.05x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$91M | -$275M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $130M | $357M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $82M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -2119.53x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KYMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KYMR five years ago would be worth $16,412 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,074 for GLUE. Over the past 12 months, GLUE leads with a +238.6% total return vs KO's +17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 48.9% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.7% | +14.0% | +20.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +238.6% | +71.4% | +17.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +149.6% | +230.0% | +46.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.3% | +64.1% | +63.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.3% | +149.4% | +120.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.7% | +48.9% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLUE's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs GLUE's 66.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 0.91x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.77 | $103.00 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.12 | $36.65 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.4% | +80.5% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.4 | 47.7 | 65.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 818K | 493K | 12.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GLUE as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 85.7% upside for GLUE (target: $32) vs 4.6% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.75 | $112.60 | $86.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 26 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KYMR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
GLUE vs KYMR vs KO: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLUE or KYMR or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc.
(GLUE) is the stronger pick with 63. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 1x trailing P/E (25. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. (GLUE) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GLUE or KYMR or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) delivered a total return of +64. 1%, compared to -19. 3% for Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. (GLUE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KYMR returned +159. 2% versus GLUE's -13. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GLUE or KYMR or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning GLUE is approximately -742% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GLUE or KYMR or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc.
(GLUE) is pulling ahead at 63. 5% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 53. 1% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GLUE or KYMR or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is GLUE or KYMR or KO more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GLUE: 85.
7% to $31. 75.
07Which pays a better dividend — GLUE or KYMR or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. GLUE, KYMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is GLUE or KYMR or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, GLUE: -13. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GLUE and KYMR and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (GLUE (Healthcare) and KYMR (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GLUE is a small-cap high-growth stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while GLUE, KYMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.