Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
GOSS logo
GOSS
MNKD logo
MNKD
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GOSS vs MNKD vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GOSS
Gossamer Bio, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$38M
5Y Perf.-98.8%
MNKD
MannKind Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.13B
5Y Perf.+109.1%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

GOSS vs MNKD vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GOSS logoGOSS
MNKD logoMNKD
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$38M$1.13B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$56M$361M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-180M$-24M$57.05B
Gross Margin99.6%76.0%60.0%
Operating Margin-321.9%3.7%25.9%
Forward P/E183.0x14.4x
Total Debt$202M$473M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$38M$75M$343.34B

GOSS vs MNKD vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GOSS
MNKD
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS)1001.2-98.8%
MannKind Corporation (MNKD)100209.1+109.1%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GOSS vs MNKD vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. MannKind Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
GOSS
Gossamer Bio, Inc.
The Secondary Option

GOSS plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
MNKD
MannKind Corporation
The Growth Play

MNKD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 22.2%, EPS growth -79.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 51.8%
  • 22.2% revenue growth vs GOSS's -57.7%
Best for: growth exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs MNKD's -28.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.94, current ratio 0.52x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMNKD logoMNKD22.2% revenue growth vs GOSS's -57.7%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 183.0x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs GOSS's -324.8%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs GOSS's 2.45
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)JPM logoJPM+21.8% vs GOSS's -87.3%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs GOSS's -96.1%, ROIC 4.5% vs -107.5%

GOSS vs MNKD vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
0.0%$0
MNKDMannKind Corporation
FY 2025
Product Revenue
62.0%$217M
Royalty
36.7%$128M
Service
1.2%$4M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

GOSS vs MNKD vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGMNKD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 5047.7x GOSS's $56M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GOSS's -3.2%. On growth, GOSS holds the edge at +71.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$56M$361M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$178M$30M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$180M-$24M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$170M$13M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+99.6%+76.0%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.2%+3.7%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.2%-6.6%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.1%+3.5%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+71.5%+15.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-25.0%-2.3%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — GOSS and JPM each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 91% valuation discount to MNKD's 183.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JPM's 18.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNKD's 29.9x.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$38M$1.1B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$202M$1.5B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.22x183.00x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple29.94x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.78x3.24x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF82.60x8.88x
Evenly matched — GOSS and JPM each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs GOSS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-96.1%-3.9%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-107.5%+21.6%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-86.1%+8.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9045
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$164M$399M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$38M$75M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$202M$473M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-15.50x0.29x0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $184 for GOSS. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs GOSS's -87.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs GOSS's -48.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-94.4%-34.6%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-87.3%-4.4%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.9%-11.6%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.2%-11.4%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.1%-28.9%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-48.0%-4.0%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOSS's 2.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs GOSS's 4.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.45x1.10x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.87$6.51$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.14$2.23$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+4.2%+56.2%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10034.163.759.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded10.7M5.3M7.0M
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: GOSS as "Buy", MNKD as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 373.6% upside for GOSS (target: $1) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$0.77$8.50$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts171961
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GOSS vs MNKD vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GOSS or MNKD or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is the stronger pick with 22.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -57. 7% for Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GOSS or MNKD or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus MannKind Corporation at 183. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GOSS or MNKD or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -98. 2% for Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus GOSS's -99. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GOSS or MNKD or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Gossamer Bio, Inc. 's 2. 45β — meaning GOSS is approximately 159% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500.

05

Which is growing faster — GOSS or MNKD or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is pulling ahead at 22.

2% versus -57. 7% for Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -200. 0% for Gossamer Bio, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GOSS or MNKD or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -351. 5% for Gossamer Bio, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -336. 8% for GOSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOSS leads at 97. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GOSS or MNKD or JPM more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GOSS: 373.

6% to $0. 77.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GOSS or MNKD or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. GOSS, MNKD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GOSS or MNKD or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS) carries a higher beta of 2. 45 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, GOSS: -99. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GOSS and MNKD and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (GOSS (Healthcare) and MNKD (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GOSS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNKD is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while GOSS, MNKD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.