Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
IMSR logo
IMSR
SMR logo
SMR
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IMSR vs SMR vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IMSR
Terrestrial Energy Inc.

Regulated Electric

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$625M
5Y Perf.-19.7%
SMR
NuScale Power Corporation

Renewable Utilities

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.43B
5Y Perf.+5.2%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$348.25B
5Y Perf.+47.5%

IMSR vs SMR vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IMSR logoIMSR
SMR logoSMR
KO logoKO
IndustryRegulated ElectricRenewable UtilitiesBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$625M$1.43B$348.25B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$19M$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$-46M$-386M$13.70B
Gross Margin22.4%61.7%
Operating Margin-38.1%29.3%
Forward P/E24.7x
Total Debt$2M$0.00$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$97M$836M$10.27B

IMSR vs SMR vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IMSR
SMR
KO
StockDec 20Jun 26Return
NuScale Power Corpo… (SMR)100105.2+5.2%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100147.5+47.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IMSR vs SMR vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. NuScale Power Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
IMSR
Terrestrial Energy Inc.
The Defensive Pick

IMSR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 4.60, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 50.62x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
SMR
NuScale Power Corporation
The Income Pick

SMR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • beta 4.06
  • Beta 4.06, current ratio 4.30x
  • Beta 4.06 vs IMSR's 4.60
Best for: income & stability and defensive
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Growth Play

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
  • 118.2% 10Y total return vs SMR's 7.0%
  • 1.9% revenue growth vs IMSR's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKO logoKO1.9% revenue growth vs IMSR's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs SMR's -20.7%
Stability / SafetySMR logoSMRBeta 4.06 vs IMSR's 4.60
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)KO logoKO+17.7% vs SMR's -74.9%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs SMR's -38.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -314.7%

IMSR vs SMR vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Nuclear Energy Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Nuclear Energy Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
IMSRTerrestrial Energy Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SMRNuScale Power Corporation
FY 2025
Other
100.0%$134,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

IMSR vs SMR vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGSMR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO and IMSR operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMR's -20.7%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…SMR logoSMRNuScale Power Cor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$19M$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$38M-$711M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$46M-$386M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$242M-$1.4B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+22.4%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-38.1%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-20.7%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-74.5%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-95.8%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-60.3%-145.5%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — IMSR and SMR and KO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…SMR logoSMRNuScale Power Cor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$625M$1.4B$348.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$530M$589M$383.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-19.38x-4.91x26.62x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.38x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple25.89x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue45.28x7.26x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.83x1.57x10.18x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF65.76x
Evenly matched — IMSR and SMR and KO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-49 for SMR. IMSR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs SMR's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…SMR logoSMRNuScale Power Cor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-23.4%-48.9%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-21.0%-38.1%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-18.8%-3.1%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-16.7%-87.8%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9507
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$95M-$836M$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$97M$836M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$0$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5.45x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,313 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,332 for IMSR. Over the past 12 months, KO leads with a +17.7% total return vs SMR's -74.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 12.6% vs IMSR's -30.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…SMR logoSMRNuScale Power Cor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+15.8%-34.7%+18.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-66.7%-74.9%+17.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.7%+31.3%+42.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.7%+6.5%+63.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.7%+7.0%+118.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-30.7%+9.5%+12.6%
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMSR's 4.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs SMR's 18.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…SMR logoSMRNuScale Power Cor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5004.60x4.06x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$27.16$57.42$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.33$8.85$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+27.8%+18.5%+96.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.841.160.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.0M32.3M12.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: SMR as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.6% upside for IMSR (target: $14) vs 6.5% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…SMR logoSMRNuScale Power Cor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.50$16.17$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts1648
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises56
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.2%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IMSR vs SMR vs KO: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IMSR or SMR or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger pick with 1.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (24. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — IMSR or SMR or KO?

Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +63.

1%, compared to -66. 7% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +118. 2% versus IMSR's -66. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — IMSR or SMR or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Terrestrial Energy Inc. 's 4. 60β — meaning IMSR is approximately -2396% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — IMSR or SMR or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is pulling ahead at 1.

9% versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -200. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMR leads at 38. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — IMSR or SMR or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -1130. 3% for NuScale Power Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -21. 9% for SMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is IMSR or SMR or KO more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMSR: 78.

6% to $13. 50.

07

Which pays a better dividend — IMSR or SMR or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield) pays a dividend. IMSR, SMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is IMSR or SMR or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +118. 2% 10Y return). Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR) carries a higher beta of 4. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +118. 2%, IMSR: -66. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between IMSR and SMR and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (IMSR (Energy) and SMR (Utilities) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

KO pays a dividend while IMSR, SMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.