Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $129M | $3.08B | $361M | $875.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $416M | $218M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-104M | $-2M | $-240M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.9% | 71.1% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 0.8% | -73.6% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 122.5x | — | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $684K | $6M | $13M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $43M | $85M | $343.34B |
IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) | 100 | 11.4 | -88.6% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 80.6 | -19.4% |
| Vanda Pharmaceutica… (VNDA) | 100 | 51.3 | -48.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMUX plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
ARQT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.49, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 3.17x
- 91.3% revenue growth vs IMUX's -8.2%
- +79.1% vs JPM's +19.1%
VNDA is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.08, current ratio 2.39x
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.9%
- 454.4% 10Y total return vs ARQT's 12.8%
- Better valuation composite
- 20.4% margin vs VNDA's -110.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.3% revenue growth vs IMUX's -8.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs VNDA's -110.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs IMUX's 1.68 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.1% vs JPM's +19.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs IMUX's -132.0% |
IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories
VNDA leads 1 • ARQT leads 1 • IMUX leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and IMUX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VNDA's -110.0%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $416M | $218M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$109M | $6M | -$150M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$104M | -$2M | -$240M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$81M | $27M | -$127M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +90.9% | +71.1% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +0.8% | -73.6% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -0.6% | -110.0% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +6.5% | -58.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +60.1% | +3.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +56.8% | +55.0% | -64.0% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
VNDA leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $129M | $3.1B | $361M | $875.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $114M | $3.0B | $288M | $1.47T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.09x | -189.15x | -1.63x | 15.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 122.45x | — | 14.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 18.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 8.18x | 1.67x | 3.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 16.51x | 1.10x | 2.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 8.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-2 for IMUX. ARQT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs IMUX's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -1.4% | -61.4% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -132.0% | -0.6% | -44.6% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -5.2% | -32.2% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -17.0% | -4.3% | -33.6% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x | 0.04x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | -$37M | -$72M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $43M | $85M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $684,000 | $6M | $13M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.08x | — | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARQT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,999 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $920 for IMUX. Over the past 12 months, ARQT leads with a +79.1% total return vs JPM's +19.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARQT at 34.0% vs IMUX's -8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +124.2% | -15.2% | -26.1% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.2% | +79.1% | +33.2% | +19.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.7% | +140.8% | -6.7% | +133.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.8% | -13.3% | -68.2% | +110.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +12.8% | -43.4% | +454.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.2% | +34.0% | -2.3% | +32.6% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMUX's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs VNDA's 61.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.80x | 1.45x | 1.01x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.77 | $31.77 | $9.94 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.67 | $12.72 | $4.14 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.9% | +77.4% | +61.4% | +93.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 59.9 | 41.1 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 289K | 1.5M | 1.0M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMUX as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", VNDA as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 133.6% upside for VNDA (target: $14) vs 8.1% for JPM (target: $339). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $34.00 | $14.25 | $338.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 12 | 19 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VNDA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or JPM?
On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
is actually cheaper at 14. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +110. 0%, compared to -90. 8% for Immunic, Inc. (IMUX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus IMUX's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Immunic, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning IMUX is approximately 91% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. (ARQT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1068. 8% for Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -102. 0% for Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -70. 0% for VNDA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VNDA leads at 94. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 122. 5x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 108. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VNDA: 133. 6% to $14. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. IMUX, ARQT, VNDA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, IMUX: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMUX and ARQT and VNDA and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (IMUX (Healthcare) and ARQT (Healthcare) and VNDA (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IMUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; VNDA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while IMUX, ARQT, VNDA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.