Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ITP vs CLW vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Banks - Diversified
ITP vs CLW vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $3M | $271M | $908.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $79M | $1.54B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-27M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 5.7% | 5.1% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -12.6% | -0.1% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 14.6x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $422M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $31K | $343.34B |
ITP vs CLW vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IT Tech Packaging, … (ITP) | 100 | 3.1 | -96.9% |
| Clearwater Paper Co… (CLW) | 100 | 46.5 | -53.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ITP vs CLW vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ITP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 6.2%, current ratio 1.41x
- Beta 0.86, current ratio 1.41x
- Better valuation composite
CLW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth -110.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.2%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs ITP's -12.4%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 1.8%
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs CLW's -73.2%
- 20.4% margin vs ITP's -13.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs ITP's -12.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs ITP's -13.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs CLW's 1.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.9% vs CLW's -37.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs ITP's -6.2%, ROIC 4.5% vs -3.7% |
ITP vs CLW vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ITP vs CLW vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3551.4x ITP's $79M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ITP's -13.9%. On growth, ITP holds the edge at +2.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $79M | $1.5B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $69M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$27M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | -$54M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +5.1% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.6% | -0.1% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.9% | -1.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | -3.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | -4.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.0% | -110.5% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ITP leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ITP's 1.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 18.5x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $271M | $908.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $693M | $1.51T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.19x | -13.54x | 16.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 14.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.15x | 6.21x | 18.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.04x | 0.17x | 3.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 0.33x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.54x | — | 9.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-7 for ITP. ITP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLW scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.1% | -3.3% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.2% | -1.7% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.7% | +1.2% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.0% | +1.4% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.51x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $422M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $30,700 | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $422M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -16.46x | -4.32x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $417 for ITP. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +20.9% total return vs CLW's -37.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs ITP's -25.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.8% | -5.1% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.3% | -37.2% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.7% | -45.5% | +138.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.8% | -41.5% | +135.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | -73.2% | +481.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.5% | -18.3% | +33.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ITP and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITP is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLW's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs ITP's 48.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 1.28x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.39 | $30.96 | $338.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.16 | $11.73 | $269.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.7% | +54.2% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 58.9 | 72.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 184K | 7.4M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLW as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.5% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -7.7% for CLW (target: $16). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.50 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.4% | +3.8% |
JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ITP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ITP vs CLW vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ITP or CLW or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clearwater Paper Corporation (CLW) is the stronger pick with 12.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 4% for IT Tech Packaging, Inc. (ITP). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clearwater Paper Corporation (CLW) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ITP or CLW or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -95. 8% for IT Tech Packaging, Inc. (ITP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus ITP's -98. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ITP or CLW or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IT Tech Packaging, Inc.
(ITP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Clearwater Paper Corporation's 1. 28β — meaning CLW is approximately 49% more volatile than ITP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IT Tech Packaging, Inc. (ITP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ITP or CLW or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearwater Paper Corporation (CLW) is pulling ahead at 12.
4% versus -12. 4% for IT Tech Packaging, Inc. (ITP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -110. 6% for Clearwater Paper Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLW leads at -9. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ITP or CLW or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -13. 0% for IT Tech Packaging, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -10. 8% for ITP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ITP or CLW or JPM more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 4.
5% to $339. 75.
07Which pays a better dividend — ITP or CLW or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. ITP, CLW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is ITP or CLW or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 8% yield, +481. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +481. 2%, CLW: -73. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ITP and CLW and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (ITP (Basic Materials) and CLW (Basic Materials) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ITP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while ITP, CLW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.