Staffing & Employment Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
JOB vs CCRN vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
JOB vs CCRN vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Medical - Care Facilities | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $25M | $426M | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $88M | $1.00B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-99M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | 19.8% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1.7% | -2.1% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 142.4x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $2M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $109M | $10.27B |
JOB vs CCRN vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEE Group, Inc. (JOB) | 100 | 41.9 | -58.1% |
| Cross Country Healt… (CCRN) | 100 | 213.8 | +113.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JOB vs CCRN vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JOB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.64
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 10.2%, current ratio 4.12x
- Beta 0.64, current ratio 4.12x
CCRN plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs CCRN's -7.9%
- 1.9% revenue growth vs CCRN's -21.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.9% revenue growth vs CCRN's -21.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs CCRN's -9.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs CCRN's 0.71 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.3% vs CCRN's -1.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs CCRN's -19.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs -0.9% |
JOB vs CCRN vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JOB vs CCRN vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 560.2x JOB's $88M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCRN's -9.8%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $88M | $1.0B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $258,000 | -$5M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | -$99M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $726,000 | $40M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.5% | +19.8% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | -2.1% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | -9.8% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +4.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.5% | -17.8% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -6.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CCRN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CCRN's 24.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KO's 26.4x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25M | $426M | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $319M | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.72x | -4.49x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 142.38x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 23.96x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 0.40x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.50x | 1.32x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 47.21x | 10.62x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-27 for CCRN. CCRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs JOB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | -27.1% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.8% | -19.8% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.2% | -0.9% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.1% | -0.8% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.01x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | -$106M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $109M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $2M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.91x | -37.00x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,712 for JOB. Over the past 12 months, JOB leads with a +20.3% total return vs CCRN's -1.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 13.7% vs JOB's -24.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.5% | +63.4% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.3% | -1.2% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.3% | -52.0% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.9% | -23.8% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | -7.9% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.7% | -21.7% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCRN's 0.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs JOB's 82.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.71x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.28 | $14.99 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.17 | $7.43 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.1% | +87.9% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.3 | 77.3 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 249K | 648K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCRN as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.2% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -11.4% for CCRN (target: $12). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $11.67 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CCRN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
JOB vs CCRN vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JOB or CCRN or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger pick with 1.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 6% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JOB or CCRN or KO?
On forward P/E, The Coca-Cola Company is actually cheaper at 25.
3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JOB or CCRN or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to -62. 9% for GEE Group, Inc. (JOB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus JOB's -94. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JOB or CCRN or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. 's 0. 71β — meaning CCRN is approximately -453% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JOB or CCRN or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is pulling ahead at 1.
9% versus -21. 6% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -565. 9% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JOB or CCRN or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -36. 0% for GEE Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -2. 9% for JOB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JOB or CCRN or KO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) trades at 25.
3x forward P/E versus 142. 4x for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. — 117. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 4. 2% to $86. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — JOB or CCRN or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. JOB, CCRN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JOB or CCRN or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, CCRN: -7. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JOB and CCRN and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (JOB (Industrials) and CCRN (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
KO pays a dividend while JOB, CCRN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.