Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
KGEI vs BATL vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
KGEI vs BATL vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $190M | $24M | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $64M | $158M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $-51M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 58.3% | 46.6% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 45.9% | -7.1% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 7.3x | 6.2x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $50M | $190M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $28M | $10.27B |
KGEI vs BATL vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kolibri Global Ener… (KGEI) | 100 | 125.2 | +25.2% |
| Battalion Oil Corpo… (BATL) | 100 | 23.7 | -76.3% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 146.3 | +46.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KGEI vs BATL vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KGEI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta -0.38, Low D/E 24.8%, current ratio 0.49x
- Lower D/E ratio (24.8% vs 132.7%)
BATL is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 25.3x)
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs KGEI's 42.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.9% revenue growth vs KGEI's -22.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs BATL's -32.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (24.8% vs 132.7%) | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.2% vs KGEI's -23.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs BATL's -10.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs -1.5% |
KGEI vs BATL vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KGEI vs BATL vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 775.9x KGEI's $64M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BATL's -32.1%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $64M | $158M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $47M | $41M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | -$51M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $40M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.3% | +46.6% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +45.9% | -7.1% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | -32.1% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -22.8% | +25.2% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.9% | -17.7% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.3% | -9.6% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BATL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.5x trailing earnings, KGEI trades at a 54% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BATL's 4.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KO's 26.4x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $190M | $24M | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $238M | $186M | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.47x | -0.63x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.34x | 6.17x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.82x | 4.08x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.29x | 0.14x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 0.12x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-39 for BATL. KGEI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs KGEI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.8% | -38.7% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | -10.9% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | -1.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | -1.8% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.98x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $48M | $162M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $28M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50M | $190M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.48x | 1.63x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,081 for BATL. Over the past 12 months, KO leads with a +17.2% total return vs KGEI's -23.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 13.7% vs BATL's -39.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.7% | +19.3% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.8% | -0.7% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.2% | -77.3% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.2% | -89.2% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.2% | -86.1% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.4% | -39.0% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BATL and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BATL is the less volatile stock with a -3.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KO's -0.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs BATL's 4.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.38x | -3.16x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.27 | $29.70 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.35 | $1.00 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.8% | +4.8% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 38.7 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 221K | 12.4M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KGEI as "Buy", BATL as "Buy", KO as "Buy". KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 2 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BATL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
KGEI vs BATL vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KGEI or BATL or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger pick with 1.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 4% for Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI). Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KGEI or BATL or KO?
On trailing P/E, Kolibri Global Energy Inc.
(KGEI) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Battalion Oil Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KGEI or BATL or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to -89. 2% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus BATL's -86. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KGEI or BATL or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the lower-risk stock at -3.
16β versus The Coca-Cola Company's -0. 20β — meaning KO is approximately -94% more volatile than BATL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KGEI or BATL or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is pulling ahead at 1.
9% versus -22. 4% for Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Battalion Oil Corporation grew EPS 42. 6% year-over-year, compared to -15. 7% for Kolibri Global Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KGEI leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KGEI or BATL or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 7. 2% for Battalion Oil Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KGEI leads at 40. 5% versus -4. 0% for BATL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KGEI or BATL or KO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) trades at 6.
2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 19. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — KGEI or BATL or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. KGEI, BATL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KGEI or BATL or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -3.
16)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BATL: -86. 1%, KGEI: +42. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KGEI and BATL and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (KGEI (Energy) and BATL (Energy) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KGEI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BATL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while KGEI, BATL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.