Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
KGEI vs TALO vs CIVI vs TPVG vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Asset Management
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
KGEI vs TALO vs CIVI vs TPVG vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Asset Management | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $190M | $2.50B | $2.34B | $226M | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $64M | $1.74B | $4.71B | $61M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $-743M | $638M | $-12M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 58.3% | 2.3% | 43.9% | 72.9% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 45.9% | -24.9% | 31.1% | -35.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 7.3x | 34.4x | 6.8x | 6.0x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $50M | $1.24B | $4.49B | $469M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $363M | $76M | $20M | $10.27B |
KGEI vs TALO vs CIVI vs TPVG vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kolibri Global Ener… (KGEI) | 100 | 125.2 | +25.2% |
| Talos Energy Inc. (TALO) | 100 | 96.5 | -3.5% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 35.9 | -64.1% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 58.9 | -41.1% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 146.3 | +46.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KGEI vs TALO vs CIVI vs TPVG vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, KGEI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TALO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +64.2% vs KGEI's -23.8%
CIVI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- PEG 0.32 vs TPVG's 5.88
- 49.8% revenue growth vs KGEI's -22.4%
- Lower P/E (6.8x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.32 vs 2.26
TPVG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 18.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65
- Beta 0.65, yield 18.4%
- Beta 0.65 vs CIVI's 0.70
KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs KGEI's 42.2%
- 27.8% margin vs TALO's -42.7%
- 13.1% ROA vs TALO's -13.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -2.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs KGEI's -22.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.8x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.32 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs TALO's -42.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs CIVI's 0.70 | |
| Dividends | 18.4% yield, vs KO's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.2% vs KGEI's -23.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs TALO's -13.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -2.3% |
KGEI vs TALO vs CIVI vs TPVG vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KGEI vs TALO vs CIVI vs TPVG vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
CIVI leads 1 • KGEI leads 0 • TALO leads 0 • TPVG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 808.1x TPVG's $61M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TALO's -42.7%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $64M | $1.7B | $4.7B | $61M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $47M | $437M | $3.4B | -$22M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | -$743M | $638M | -$12M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $489M | $934M | -$59M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.3% | +2.3% | +43.9% | +72.9% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +45.9% | -24.9% | +31.1% | -35.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | -42.7% | +13.6% | -19.5% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -22.8% | +28.1% | +19.8% | -97.1% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.9% | -7.9% | -8.1% | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.3% | -29.4% | -33.9% | -2.3% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CIVI leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 88% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CIVI offers better value at 0.15x vs TPVG's 4.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $190M | $2.5B | $2.3B | $226M | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $238M | $3.4B | $6.8B | $675M | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.47x | -5.30x | 3.24x | 4.57x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.34x | 34.36x | 6.75x | 5.96x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.15x | 4.50x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.82x | 3.14x | 1.89x | 8.91x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.29x | 1.40x | 0.45x | 2.33x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 1.21x | 0.41x | 0.63x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.50x | 2.61x | — | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-33 for TALO. KGEI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs TPVG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.8% | -33.2% | +9.5% | -3.4% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | -13.2% | +4.2% | -1.5% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | -2.3% | +10.8% | +7.2% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | -2.0% | +12.1% | +9.4% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.57x | 0.68x | 1.33x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $48M | $879M | $4.4B | $449M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $363M | $76M | $20M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50M | $1.2B | $4.5B | $469M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.48x | -2.36x | 2.80x | -1.02x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,665 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, TALO leads with a +64.2% total return vs KGEI's -23.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 13.7% vs CIVI's -17.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.7% | +33.0% | -1.5% | -12.7% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.8% | +64.2% | -7.8% | -10.7% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.2% | +10.7% | -43.2% | -22.4% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.2% | -9.8% | +3.1% | -23.3% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.2% | -58.8% | -81.2% | +85.3% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.4% | +3.4% | -17.2% | -8.1% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KGEI and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KGEI is the less volatile stock with a -0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIVI's 0.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs KGEI's 64.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.38x | -0.28x | 0.70x | 0.65x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.27 | $17.05 | $37.45 | $7.50 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.35 | $7.67 | $25.38 | $4.48 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.8% | +87.7% | +73.1% | +74.3% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 46.7 | 54.8 | 49.9 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 221K | 1.6M | 22.4M | 298K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TPVG and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KGEI as "Buy", TALO as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold", TPVG as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.7% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 18.40% vs KO's 2.46%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $33.00 | $8.95 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 13 | 16 | 12 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +18.2% | +18.4% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 1 | 0 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $4.98 | $1.02 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +4.8% | +18.3% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CIVI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
KGEI vs TALO vs CIVI vs TPVG vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KGEI or TALO or CIVI or TPVG or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 4% for Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KGEI or TALO or CIVI or TPVG or KO?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Civitas Resources, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 5. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KGEI or TALO or CIVI or TPVG or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to -23. 3% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus CIVI's -81. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KGEI or TALO or CIVI or TPVG or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kolibri Global Energy Inc.
(KGEI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 38β versus Civitas Resources, Inc. 's 0. 70β — meaning CIVI is approximately -283% more volatile than KGEI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KGEI or TALO or CIVI or TPVG or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -22. 4% for Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -555. 8% for Talos Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KGEI or TALO or CIVI or TPVG or KO?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -27. 9% for Talos Energy Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -5. 9% for TALO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KGEI or TALO or CIVI or TPVG or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 5. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 34. 4x for Talos Energy Inc. — 28. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 60. 7% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — KGEI or TALO or CIVI or TPVG or KO?
In this comparison, TPVG (18.
4% yield), CIVI (18. 2% yield), KO (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. KGEI, TALO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KGEI or TALO or CIVI or TPVG or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, CIVI: -81. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KGEI and TALO and CIVI and TPVG and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (KGEI (Energy) and TALO (Energy) and CIVI (Energy) and TPVG (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KGEI is a small-cap deep-value stock; TALO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. CIVI, TPVG, KO pay a dividend while KGEI, TALO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.