Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
KZIA logo
KZIA
NKTR logo
NKTR
IMVT logo
IMVT
RCUS logo
RCUS
CRL logo
CRL
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KZIA vs NKTR vs IMVT vs RCUS vs CRL vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KZIA
Kazia Therapeutics Limited

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • AU
Market Cap$16M
5Y Perf.-91.6%
NKTR
Nektar Therapeutics

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.16B
5Y Perf.-82.9%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.+38.1%
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.40B
5Y Perf.-3.8%
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.03B
5Y Perf.+7.5%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

KZIA vs NKTR vs IMVT vs RCUS vs CRL vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KZIA logoKZIA
NKTR logoNKTR
IMVT logoIMVT
RCUS logoRCUS
CRL logoCRL
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$16M$1.16B$6.90B$2.40B$9.03B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$3M$56M$0.00$236M$4.03B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-47M$-158M$-506M$-369M$-185M$57.05B
Gross Margin100.0%99.4%90.7%31.9%60.0%
Operating Margin-16.9%-224.9%-168.6%11.8%25.9%
Forward P/E16.9x14.4x
Total Debt$396K$149M$72K$99M$3.07B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$4M$15M$902M$222M$214M$343.34B

KZIA vs NKTR vs IMVT vs RCUS vs CRL vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KZIA
NKTR
IMVT
RCUS
CRL
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Kazia Therapeutics … (KZIA)1008.4-91.6%
Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR)10017.1-82.9%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100138.1+38.1%
Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS)10096.2-3.8%
Charles River Labor… (CRL)100107.5+7.5%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KZIA vs NKTR vs IMVT vs RCUS vs CRL vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 6 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Nektar Therapeutics is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
KZIA
Kazia Therapeutics Limited
The Healthcare Pick

KZIA plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
NKTR
Nektar Therapeutics
The Defensive Pick

NKTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 1.50, current ratio 4.97x
  • +5.8% vs JPM's +21.8%
Best for: defensive
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.66, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 9.09x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 6 stocks, RCUS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

CRL doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 237.9%
  • 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs KZIA's -98.2%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJPM logoJPM3.3% NII/revenue growth vs KZIA's -98.2%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 16.9x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs KZIA's -18.7%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs KZIA's 2.06
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NKTR logoNKTR+5.8% vs JPM's +21.8%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs KZIA's -7.8%

KZIA vs NKTR vs IMVT vs RCUS vs CRL vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KZIAKazia Therapeutics Limited
FY 2025
Licensing Revenue
0.0%$0
NKTRNektar Therapeutics
FY 2025
Non Cash Royalty Revenue Related To Sale Of Future Royalties
99.5%$55M
License Collaboration And Other Revenue
0.5%$300,000
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RCUSArcus Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
License And Development Services
87.4%$221M
Development Services
6.7%$17M
R&D Services
3.2%$8M
License
2.8%$7M
CRLCharles River Laboratories International, Inc.
FY 2025
Discovery and Safety Assessment
59.8%$2.4B
Research Models and Services
21.1%$846M
Manufacturing Support
19.1%$766M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

KZIA vs NKTR vs IMVT vs RCUS vs CRL vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGCRL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KZIA's -18.7%. On growth, NKTR holds the edge at +3.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKZIA logoKZIAKazia Therapeutic…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3M$56M$0$236M$4.0B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$40M-$124M-$532M-$391M$824M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$47M-$158M-$506M-$369M-$185M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$14M-$204M-$407M-$489M$391M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+100.0%+99.4%+90.7%+31.9%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-16.9%-2.2%-168.6%+11.8%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-18.7%-2.8%-156.4%-4.6%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-5.5%-3.7%-2.1%+9.7%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-99.2%+3.8%-39.3%+1.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+79.5%+49.7%-14.1%+10.5%-160.0%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CRL and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CRL's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 18.4x.

MetricKZIA logoKZIAKazia Therapeutic…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$16M$1.2B$6.9B$2.4B$9.0B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$13M$1.3B$6.0B$2.3B$11.9B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.08x-6.10x-12.14x-7.23x-64.44x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.90x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.04x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue530.20x21.01x9.70x2.25x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share11.15x7.19x4.05x2.89x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.42x8.88x
Evenly matched — CRL and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-87 for NKTR. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricKZIA logoKZIAKazia Therapeutic…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-87.0%-68.2%-69.0%-5.7%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-7.8%-40.7%-62.2%-35.3%-2.5%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-57.2%-64.1%+6.3%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-55.7%-68.3%-42.1%+8.1%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9222045
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.66x0.00x0.16x0.95x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$4M$134M-$902M-$123M$2.9B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$15M$902M$222M$214M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$396,000$149M$72,000$99M$3.1B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-4.15x-13.38x4.29x0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NKTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $271 for KZIA. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +577.9% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 90.8% vs KZIA's -38.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKZIA logoKZIAKazia Therapeutic…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+185.6%+36.8%+29.8%+2.2%-7.4%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+45.9%+577.9%+110.9%+154.5%+23.5%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-77.2%+594.5%+55.0%+18.3%-8.7%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.3%-77.6%+213.0%-3.1%-47.2%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.5%-73.6%+237.9%+40.0%+122.4%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-38.9%+90.8%+15.7%+5.8%-3.0%+33.6%
NKTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KZIA's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs NKTR's 54.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKZIA logoKZIAKazia Therapeutic…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.06x1.50x1.66x2.00x1.39x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.40$109.00$36.27$28.72$228.88$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.86$7.99$14.32$7.91$143.06$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+82.1%+54.5%+92.7%+82.9%+81.9%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.832.157.946.560.859.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded237K994K1.9M1.1M767K7.0M
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: NKTR as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 151.9% upside for NKTR (target: $150) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricKZIA logoKZIAKazia Therapeutic…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$149.60$43.67$31.00$213.17$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts3323183761
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+4.0%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NKTR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KZIA vs NKTR vs IMVT vs RCUS vs CRL vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KZIA or NKTR or IMVT or RCUS or CRL or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 2% for Kazia Therapeutics Limited (KZIA). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KZIA or NKTR or IMVT or RCUS or CRL or JPM?

On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KZIA or NKTR or IMVT or RCUS or CRL or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -97. 3% for Kazia Therapeutics Limited (KZIA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus KZIA's -96. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KZIA or NKTR or IMVT or RCUS or CRL or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Kazia Therapeutics Limited's 2. 06β — meaning KZIA is approximately 118% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KZIA or NKTR or IMVT or RCUS or CRL or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -98. 2% for Kazia Therapeutics Limited (KZIA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kazia Therapeutics Limited grew EPS 65. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KZIA leads at 61. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KZIA or NKTR or IMVT or RCUS or CRL or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -492. 9% for Kazia Therapeutics Limited — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -338. 5% for KZIA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KZIA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KZIA or NKTR or IMVT or RCUS or CRL or JPM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NKTR: 151. 9% to $149. 60.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KZIA or NKTR or IMVT or RCUS or CRL or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. KZIA, NKTR, IMVT, RCUS, CRL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is KZIA or NKTR or IMVT or RCUS or CRL or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Kazia Therapeutics Limited (KZIA) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, KZIA: -96. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KZIA and NKTR and IMVT and RCUS and CRL and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (KZIA (Healthcare) and NKTR (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and RCUS (Healthcare) and CRL (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KZIA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while KZIA, NKTR, IMVT, RCUS, CRL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.